• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对堕胎倡导的看法:一项混合方法研究的结果。

Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study.

机构信息

Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA

Community Health and Social Sciences, CUNY School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jan;49(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201394. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201394
PMID:35396323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9872227/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to assess physicians' perspectives of what constitutes abortion advocacy and the skills needed to be effective in their efforts to safeguard legal abortion.

METHODS

Alumni from a physician training programme for sexual and reproductive health advocacy completed a cross-sectional survey including questions on perceived skills needed for effective advocacy. The research team conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with alumni, based on their level of engagement in advocacy. We present descriptive statistics for survey data and themes identified in the interview data using techniques informed by grounded theory.

RESULTS

Of the survey respondents (n=231), almost a third (28.6%; n=66) felt the most important media skill they learnt was the ability to stay on message. The most important policy skill was communicating effectively with policymakers (47.0%; n=108), followed by distilling evidence for policymakers and laypeople (13.0%; n=30). In the IDIs (n=36), participants reported activities such as media interviews as clear examples of advocacy, but also considered implementing institutional policies and abortion provision to be advocacy. They discussed how individual comfort and capacity for advocacy activities may change over time, given personal and professional considerations. Regardless of the type of activity, physicians valued strategic communication and relationship-building skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, training programmes that seek to mobilise physician advocates to advance sexual and reproductive health and rights should work with trainees to create a tailored advocacy plan that fits their personal and professional lives and goals. Regardless of the types of advocacy activities physicians focus on, strategic communication may be central in skills-based training.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估医生对何为堕胎倡导以及为有效维护合法堕胎而需具备何种技能的看法。

方法

性健康和生殖健康倡导医师培训项目的校友完成了一项横断面调查,其中包括有关有效倡导所需的感知技能的问题。研究团队根据校友参与倡导的程度对其进行了深入访谈(IDIs)。我们使用扎根理论方法提供的技术,对调查数据和访谈数据中确定的主题进行描述性统计。

结果

在调查对象(n=231)中,近三分之一(28.6%;n=66)的人认为他们所学的最重要的媒体技能是保持信息一致的能力。最重要的政策技能是与政策制定者有效沟通(47.0%;n=108),其次是为政策制定者和非专业人士提炼证据(13.0%;n=30)。在 IDIs(n=36)中,参与者报告了媒体采访等活动是明确的倡导例子,但他们也认为实施机构政策和提供堕胎也是倡导。他们讨论了由于个人和职业考虑,个人的倡导活动的舒适度和能力可能会随时间而改变。无论活动类型如何,医生都重视战略沟通和建立关系的技能。

结论

基于我们的研究结果,旨在动员医师倡导者推进性健康和生殖健康及权利的培训项目应与受训者合作,制定适合其个人和职业生活及目标的量身定制的倡导计划。无论医生关注哪种类型的倡导活动,战略沟通都可能是技能培训的核心。

相似文献

1
Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study.医生对堕胎倡导的看法:一项混合方法研究的结果。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Jan;49(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201394. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Physician engagement in reproductive health advocacy: findings from a mixed methods evaluation of a leadership and advocacy program.医生参与生殖健康倡导:领导力和倡导计划混合方法评估的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05410-5.
3
Sexual and Reproductive Health Advocacy Successes, Failures, and Needs in the United States: Perspectives From Key Stakeholders.美国性与生殖健康倡导的成功、失败与需求:主要利益攸关方的观点。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 Mar;25(2):183-187. doi: 10.1177/15248399221137053. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Physicians and healthcare professionals as advocates for abortion care and reproductive choice.医生和医疗保健专业人员作为堕胎护理和生殖选择的倡导者。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec 1;34(6):367-372. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000833.
5
6
The U.S. Global Gag Rule in Ethiopia: a foreign policy challenging domestic sexual and reproductive health and rights gains.美国在埃塞俄比亚的全球套套禁令:一项挑战国内性与生殖健康及权利的外交政策。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(Suppl 1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01329-6.
7
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
8
Challenges and opportunities from using abortion harm reduction and value clarification and attitude transformation engagements for safe abortion advocacy in Uganda.在乌干达开展安全堕胎倡导工作时,利用堕胎减少伤害、价值澄清和态度转变的方法所面临的挑战与机遇。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jun 28;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01637-5.
9
Roadblocks at every turn: What reproductive health experts say about barriers to legislative abortion advocacy.处处设障:生殖健康专家谈立法倡导堕胎的障碍
Contraception. 2024 Jan;129:110276. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110276. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
10
The use of social media for reproductive health advocacy among physicians: a content analysis of tweets by physicians engaged in reproductive health care.社交媒体在医师生殖健康倡导中的应用:对从事生殖保健的医师推文的内容分析。
J Commun Healthc. 2024 Oct;17(3):285-291. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2024.2360825. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician engagement in reproductive health advocacy: findings from a mixed methods evaluation of a leadership and advocacy program.医生参与生殖健康倡导:领导力和倡导计划混合方法评估的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05410-5.
2
Organizing Primary Care Clinicians to Expand Reproductive Health Access: A Qualitative Program Evaluation.组织初级保健临床医生扩大生殖健康服务:定性方案评估。
Fam Med. 2024 Apr;56(4):250-258. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.589091. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
3
Analysis of the health advocacy concept from the perspective of the evolutionary method.从进化方法的角度分析健康倡导理念。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2023 Oct 13;57:e20230170. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0170en. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Advocacy Curricula in Graduate Medical Education.一项关于研究生医学教育中倡导课程的系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Nov;34(11):2592-2601. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05184-3.
2
Perspective: Physician advocacy: what is it and how do we do it?观点:医师倡导:是什么以及我们如何做?
Acad Med. 2010 Jan;85(1):63-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c40d40.
3
Uneasy allies: pro-choice physicians, feminist health activists and the struggle for abortion rights.关系微妙的盟友:支持堕胎权利的医生、女权主义健康活动家与堕胎权斗争
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Sep;26(6):775-96. doi: 10.1111/j.0141-9889.2004.00418.x.
4
Declaration of Professional Responsibility: Medicine's Social Contract with Humanity.专业责任宣言:医学与人类的社会契约。
Mo Med. 2002 May;99(5):195.