Suppr超能文献

德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽与德谷胰岛素门冬胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病患者的疗效比较:一项基于扫描式连续葡萄糖监测的随机交叉研究

Efficacy of IDegLira Versus IDegAsp Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study by isCGM.

作者信息

Kawaguchi Yuji, Miyamoto Shoko, Hajika Yuriko, Ashida Narumi, Hirota Tomoe, Masumoto Koji, Sawa Jun, Hamazaki Kenji, Kumeda Yasuro

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Minamiosaka Hospital, 1-18-18, Higashikagaya, Suminoe-ku, Osaka, 559-0012, Japan.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2688-2700. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02138-w. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare the efficacy of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) in controlling glucose fluctuation and suppressing postprandial glucose levels using intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomly allocated to receive either IDegLira or IDegAsp followed by IDegAsp or IDegLira, respectively. A crossover study was conducted with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring. We compared the postprandial blood glucose level, time in range, and time below range from a 3-day intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring period for each treatment group.

RESULTS

The time in range was significantly higher in IDegLira than in IDegAsp. Postprandial glucose levels 90 and 120 min after breakfast and 60, 90, and 120 min after lunch were significantly lower for IDegLira than for IDegAsp. However, postprandial glucose levels 90 and 120 min after supper were significantly lower for IDegAsp than for IDegLira. There was no significant difference in the time below range between IDegLira and IDegAsp.

CONCLUSION

IDegLira was more effective in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus than IDegAsp, as indicated by a higher time in range and lower postprandial glucose level at breakfast and lunch. This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000039221).

摘要

引言

我们旨在使用间歇性扫描式连续血糖监测比较德谷胰岛素/门冬胰岛素(IDegAsp)和德谷胰岛素/利拉鲁肽(IDegLira)在控制血糖波动和抑制餐后血糖水平方面的疗效。

方法

24例2型糖尿病患者被随机分配,分别接受IDegLira或IDegAsp治疗,随后再分别接受IDegAsp或IDegLira治疗。采用间歇性扫描式连续血糖监测进行交叉研究。我们比较了每个治疗组在3天间歇性扫描式连续血糖监测期间的餐后血糖水平、血糖在目标范围内的时间以及血糖低于目标范围的时间。

结果

IDegLira组血糖在目标范围内的时间显著高于IDegAsp组。早餐后90分钟和120分钟以及午餐后60分钟、90分钟和120分钟时,IDegLira组的餐后血糖水平显著低于IDegAsp组。然而,晚餐后90分钟和120分钟时,IDegAsp组的餐后血糖水平显著低于IDegLira组。IDegLira组和IDegAsp组血糖低于目标范围的时间无显著差异。

结论

IDegLira在治疗2型糖尿病方面比IDegAsp更有效,表现为早餐和午餐时血糖在目标范围内的时间更长且餐后血糖水平更低。本研究已在大学医院医学信息网络临床试验注册中心注册(UMIN 000039221)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9ac/9122848/af09539bea17/12325_2022_2138_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验