State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Fujian Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and Health, Fujian Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecology, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 10;833:155218. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155218. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
Rapid urbanization involves the expansion of construction land, which changes the land use and landscape pattern in watersheds. Moreover, it degrades ecosystem services and habitat quality, thus creating adverse ecological impacts such as the diffusion of non-point source (NPS) pollution. Therefore, it is urgent to investigate the adverse effects and potential ecological risks caused by variations in land use due to territory development and urbanization. Houxi Basin is a typical Chinese southeastern coastal watershed in the process of urbanization, and the ecological risk from 2011 to 2019 is here assessed. Based on ecosystem vulnerability and the interference with the ecosystem, we evaluated the risk of degradation of habitat services provided by terrestrial ecosystems due to changes in landscape patterns. In addition, the export coefficient model is employed to build an exposure-response relationship between land use and NPS pollution to investigate the risk of degrading water-purification services provided by aquatic ecosystems. The results show that the risks of degrading habitat-provision services increase slightly but for water-purification services increases rapidly. Alternatively, the integrated optimization scenario of key areas for 2030 reduces the risk of pollution diffusion and the landscape risk by 4.27% and 10.25%, respectively, compared with the business-as-usual scenario. In summary, reasonable planning of land-use types and spatial layout is conducive to reducing ecological risks. Other conclusions can be drawn: the combined replacement of forest and grassland more effectively inhibits pollution diffusion than does replacing only forest or only grassland. Optimizing areas with high land-use impact coefficients inhibits pollution diffusion more effectively than does optimizing areas with high export coefficients. Lastly, instead of increasing the area of green land, adjusting its spatial layout proves to be more effective in lowering the ecological risk to water-purification and habitat-provision services.
快速城市化涉及建设用地的扩张,这改变了流域的土地利用和景观格局。此外,它还降低了生态系统服务和生境质量,从而造成了非点源(NPS)污染扩散等不利的生态影响。因此,迫切需要调查由于领土开发和城市化导致的土地利用变化所带来的不利影响和潜在生态风险。厚溪流域是中国东南部沿海典型的流域,正处于城市化进程中,本文评估了 2011 年至 2019 年期间的生态风险。基于生态系统脆弱性和对生态系统的干扰,我们评估了由于景观格局变化导致陆地生态系统提供的生境服务退化的风险。此外,利用输出系数模型建立了土地利用与 NPS 污染之间的暴露-响应关系,以调查水生生态系统提供的水净化服务退化的风险。结果表明,生境供应服务退化的风险略有增加,但水净化服务退化的风险迅速增加。相比之下,2030 年关键区域的综合优化情景与基准情景相比,分别减少了 4.27%和 10.25%的污染扩散风险和景观风险。总的来说,合理规划土地利用类型和空间布局有利于降低生态风险。还得出其他结论:森林和草地的综合替代比仅替代森林或仅替代草地更有效地抑制污染扩散。优化高土地利用影响系数的区域比优化高输出系数的区域更有效地抑制污染扩散。最后,与增加绿地面积相比,调整其空间布局在降低水净化和生境供应服务的生态风险方面更为有效。