• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传感器引导的间隙平衡与初次全膝关节置换术中的手动间隙平衡:一项荟萃分析。

Sensor-guided gap balance versus manual gap balance in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, No. 168 Litang Road, Dongxiaokou Town, Changping District, Beijing, 102218, China.

FRCS (Edinburgh), Kuching Specialist Hospital, Tabuan Stutong Commercial Centre, 93350, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 19;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03129-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-022-03129-x
PMID:35440065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite Vast improvements in technology and surgical technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), approximately 15-25% TKAs, have suboptimal subjective clinical outcomes. Our study sought to evaluate if sensor-guided balancing improves postoperative clinical outcomes compared to a conventional gap balancing technique.

METHODS

We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang database in March 2022 to identify studies involving sensor-guided balancing versus conventional gap balancing technique in TKA. Finally, we identified 2147 knees assessed in nine studies.

RESULTS

Compared with manual gap balancing, Sensor-guided gap balancing resulted in less rate of Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) (P = 0.02), however more rate of intraoperative additional procedures (P = 0.0003). There were no significant differences in terms of KSS (P = 0.21), KSS Function score (P = 0.36), OKS (P = 0.61), KOOS (P = 0.78), operative time (P = 0.17), Mechanical axis (P = 0.69) and rate of reoperation between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional manual gap balancing techniques, sensors have more balancing procedures being performed. However, it did result in a reduction in the rate of MUA. More extensive, high-quality RCTs are required to verify our findings further.

摘要

背景

尽管全膝关节置换术(TKA)在技术和手术技术方面取得了巨大进步,但仍有约 15-25%的 TKA 术后临床效果不理想。我们的研究旨在评估传感器引导平衡是否比传统的间隙平衡技术更能改善术后临床结果。

方法

我们于 2022 年 3 月在 Web of Science、Embase、PubMed、Cochrane 对照试验登记处、Cochrane 图书馆、Highwire、CBM、CNKI、VIP 和万方数据库中进行了检索,以确定涉及 TKA 中传感器引导平衡与传统间隙平衡技术的研究。最后,我们确定了 9 项研究中评估的 2147 个膝关节。

结果

与手动间隙平衡相比,传感器引导间隙平衡导致麻醉下手法复位(MUA)的发生率较低(P=0.02),但术中附加手术的发生率较高(P=0.0003)。在 KSS(P=0.21)、KSS 功能评分(P=0.36)、OKS(P=0.61)、KOOS(P=0.78)、手术时间(P=0.17)、机械轴(P=0.69)和两组之间的再手术率方面,无显著差异。

结论

与传统的手动间隙平衡技术相比,传感器进行了更多的平衡程序。然而,它确实降低了 MUA 的发生率。需要进行更多广泛、高质量的 RCT 来进一步验证我们的发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/308344f4aaf5/13018_2022_3129_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/7f56016395b0/13018_2022_3129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/1d31870eeb72/13018_2022_3129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/91495b1f1de5/13018_2022_3129_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/3f613e51ced0/13018_2022_3129_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/32844f612422/13018_2022_3129_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/c7e9134c4065/13018_2022_3129_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/fafa38a494e3/13018_2022_3129_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/fe31c6ce9037/13018_2022_3129_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/59f469d64e48/13018_2022_3129_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/308344f4aaf5/13018_2022_3129_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/7f56016395b0/13018_2022_3129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/1d31870eeb72/13018_2022_3129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/91495b1f1de5/13018_2022_3129_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/3f613e51ced0/13018_2022_3129_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/32844f612422/13018_2022_3129_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/c7e9134c4065/13018_2022_3129_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/fafa38a494e3/13018_2022_3129_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/fe31c6ce9037/13018_2022_3129_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/59f469d64e48/13018_2022_3129_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b71/9020069/308344f4aaf5/13018_2022_3129_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensor-guided gap balance versus manual gap balance in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.传感器引导的间隙平衡与初次全膝关节置换术中的手动间隙平衡:一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 19;17(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03129-x.
2
Randomized Controlled Trial of Sensor-Guided Knee Balancing Compared to Standard Balancing Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty.随机对照试验:与标准平衡技术相比,传感器引导的膝关节平衡在全膝关节置换术中的应用。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):953-957. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
No Benefit to Sensor-guided Balancing Compared With Freehand Balancing in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.与徒手平衡相比,TKA 中传感器引导平衡没有优势:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Aug 1;480(8):1535-1544. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002168. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed no difference in range of motion, reoperation rate or functional outcomes when compared to manually balanced total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.与手动平衡全膝关节置换相比,Verasense 传感器辅助全膝关节置换在运动范围、翻修率或功能结果方面没有差异:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 May;31(5):1851-1858. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07352-9. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.术中压力传感器可改善全膝关节置换术中的软组织平衡,但不能改善临床结局:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2022 May;104-B(5):604-612. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B5.BJJ-2021-1299.R2.
6
Current role of intraoperative sensing technology in total knee arthroplasty.目前术中传感技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2255-2265. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04130-5. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
Does the Use of Intraoperative Pressure Sensors for Knee Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Clinical Outcomes? A Comparative Study With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up.术中压力传感器在全膝关节置换术中用于膝关节平衡是否能改善临床结果?一项至少两年随访的比较研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):514-519. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Clinical outcome of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an increased flexion gap in patients with preoperative stiffness.术前僵硬患者采用增加屈曲间隙的后稳定型全膝关节置换术的临床疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):426-433. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2018-1404.R3.
9
Spacer-based gap balancing is useful in total knee arthroplasty: a 3-year follow-up of a retrospective study.基于间隔物的间隙平衡在全膝关节置换术中很有用:一项回顾性研究的 3 年随访结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 21;16(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02788-6.
10
Does soft tissue balancing using intraoperative pressure sensors improve clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty? A protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.使用术中压力传感器进行软组织平衡是否能改善全膝关节置换术的临床结果?一项多中心随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 10;9(5):e027812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027812.

引用本文的文献

1
SMART (self- monitoring analysis and reporting technology) and sensor based technology applications in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.SMART(自我监测分析与报告技术)及基于传感器的技术在创伤与骨科手术中的应用。
J Orthop. 2023 Sep 18;44:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.09.006. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Patella scores are similar both with gap balancing and measured resection after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized single-centre study.全膝关节置换术后间隙平衡与测量截骨的髌骨评分相似:一项单中心随机研究
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):4942-4950. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07540-7. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prevalence and Treatment Outcome.全膝关节置换术后僵硬:患病率及治疗结果
Cureus. 2021 Sep 25;13(9):e18271. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18271. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Accuracy of different navigation systems for femoral and tibial implantation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised comparative study.不同导航系统在全膝关节置换术中股骨和胫骨植入的准确性:一项随机对照研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2267-2276. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04205-3. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Long-term effects of cemented and cementless fixations of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Verasense sensor-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed no difference in range of motion, reoperation rate or functional outcomes when compared to manually balanced total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.
与手动平衡全膝关节置换相比,Verasense 传感器辅助全膝关节置换在运动范围、翻修率或功能结果方面没有差异:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 May;31(5):1851-1858. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07352-9. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
全膝关节置换术的骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定的长期效果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 12;16(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02762-2.
4
Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: an evolution in progress. A concise review of the available systems and the data supporting them.机器人辅助膝关节置换术:不断演进的技术。对现有系统及相关数据的简要综述。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2099-2117. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04134-1. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
Kinetic Sensors for Ligament Balance and Kinematic Evaluation in Anatomic Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.用于解剖双十字韧带稳定型全膝关节置换术中韧带平衡和运动学评估的运动传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;21(16):5427. doi: 10.3390/s21165427.
6
Current role of intraoperative sensing technology in total knee arthroplasty.目前术中传感技术在全膝关节置换术中的应用。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2255-2265. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04130-5. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
Patient Satisfaction Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Contributing Factors.初次全膝关节置换术后的患者满意度:影响因素
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jul;9(4):379-386. doi: 10.22038/abjs.2020.46395.2274.
8
Impact of intra-operative predictive ligament balance on post-operative balance and patient outcome in TKA: a prospective multicenter study.全膝关节置换术中预测性韧带平衡对术后平衡和患者结局的影响:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2165-2174. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04043-3. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
9
Manipulation under anaesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty : minimal differences in intravenous sedation alone versus neuraxial anaesthesia.初次全膝关节置换术后麻醉下手法复位:单纯静脉镇静与脊麻的差异极小。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6 Supple A):126-130. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1950.R1.
10
Causes of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.全膝关节置换术后僵硬的原因:系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2021 Aug;45(8):1983-1999. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05023-3. Epub 2021 Apr 6.