Department of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;33(6):1300-1311. doi: 10.1111/jce.15505. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic review to describe and compare the different approaches for performing cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures in patients with interrupted inferior vena cava (IVC) or equivalent entities causing IVC obstruction.
We conducted a structured search to identify manuscripts reporting EP procedures with interrupted IVC or IVC obstruction of any aetiology published up until August 2020. No restrictions were applied in the search strategy. We also included seven local cases that met inclusion criteria.
The analysis included 142 patients (mean age 48.9 years; 48% female) undergoing 143 procedures. Obstruction of the IVC was not known before the index procedure in 54% of patients. Congenital interruption of IVC was the most frequent cause (80%); and, associated congenital heart disease (CHD) was observed in 43% of patients in this setting. The superior approach for ablation was the most frequently used strategy (52%), followed by inferior approach via the azygos or hemiazygos vein (24%), transhepatic approach (14%), and retroaortic approach (10%). Electroanatomical mapping (58%), use of long sheaths (41%), intracardiac echocardiography (19%), transesophageal echocardiography (15%) and remote controlled magnetic navigation (13%) were used as adjuncts to aid performance. Ablation was successful in 135 of 140 procedures in which outcomes were reported. Major complications were only reported in patients undergoing AF ablation, including two patients with pericardial effusion, one of whom required surgical repair, and another patient who died after inadvertent entry into an undiagnosed atrioesophageal fistula from a previous procedure.
The superior approach is most frequent approach for performing EP procedures in the setting of obstructed IVC. Transhepatic approach is a feasible alternative, and may provide a "familiar approach" for transseptal access when it is required. Adjunctive use of long sheaths, intravascular echocardiography, electro-anatomical mapping and remote magnetic navigation may be helpful, especially if there is associated complex CHD. With careful planning, EP procedures can usually be successfully performed with a low risk of complications.
本研究旨在进行系统综述,描述并比较不同方法在处理因中断的下腔静脉(IVC)或其他导致 IVC 阻塞的实体而引起的心脏电生理学(EP)程序中的应用。
我们进行了结构化搜索,以确定截至 2020 年 8 月报告有中断的 IVC 或任何病因引起的 IVC 阻塞的 EP 程序的文献。搜索策略没有任何限制。我们还包括符合纳入标准的 7 例本地病例。
分析纳入了 142 名(平均年龄 48.9 岁;48%为女性)接受 143 次手术的患者。54%的患者在索引手术前不知道 IVC 阻塞。IVC 先天性中断是最常见的原因(80%);在这种情况下,43%的患者伴有先天性心脏病(CHD)。消融的上腔途径是最常使用的策略(52%),其次是通过奇静脉或半奇静脉的下腔途径(24%)、经肝途径(14%)和主动脉后途径(10%)。电解剖映射(58%)、使用长鞘管(41%)、心内超声心动图(19%)、经食管超声心动图(15%)和远程控制磁导航(13%)被用作辅助手段以帮助进行手术。在报告结果的 140 次手术中,有 135 次消融成功。仅在接受 AF 消融的患者中报告了重大并发症,包括两名心包积液患者,其中一名需要手术修复,另一名患者在无意中进入先前手术未诊断的房-食管瘘后死亡。
在上腔静脉阻塞的情况下,上腔途径是进行 EP 程序最常用的方法。经肝途径是一种可行的替代方法,当需要经间隔穿刺时,它可能提供一种“熟悉的方法”。辅助使用长鞘管、血管内超声心动图、电解剖映射和远程磁导航可能会有所帮助,特别是在伴有复杂 CHD 的情况下。通过仔细的规划,通常可以成功进行 EP 程序,并且并发症的风险较低。