• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Decisional Conflict is Associated with Treatment Modality and not Disease Knowledge in South African Men with Prostate Cancer: Baseline Results from a Longitudinal Prospective Observational Study.南非前列腺癌男性的决策冲突与治疗方式相关,而与疾病知识无关:一项纵向前瞻性观察研究的基线结果。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221082791. doi: 10.1177/10732748221082791.
2
Depression, Anxiety, and Their Association to Health-Related Quality of Life in Men Commencing Prostate Cancer Treatment at Tertiary Hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦的三家三级医院中,接受前列腺癌治疗的男性的抑郁、焦虑及其与健康相关生活质量的关系。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221125561. doi: 10.1177/10732748221125561.
3
A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels.一项关于前列腺癌主动监测对焦虑和痛苦水平影响的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2015 Mar;24(3):348-54. doi: 10.1002/pon.3657. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
4
Low conflict and high satisfaction: Decisional outcomes after attending a combined clinic to choose between robotic prostatectomy and radiotherapy for prostate cancer.低冲突和高满意度:在参加一个综合诊所后选择机器人前列腺切除术和放疗治疗前列腺癌的决策结果。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Jan;40(1):8.e1-8.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer at Tertiary Hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦三级医院局部前列腺癌男性的 COVID-19 相关焦虑。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211024239. doi: 10.1177/10732748211024239.
6
When study site contributes to outcomes in a multi-center randomized trial: a secondary analysis of decisional conflict in men with localized prostate cancer.在多中心随机试验中研究地点对结果的影响:对局限性前列腺癌男性决策冲突的二次分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 25;12:159. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0159-3.
7
Anxiety and distress during active surveillance for early prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌主动监测期间的焦虑和痛苦
Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;115(17):3868-78. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24446.
8
Prostatectomy versus radiotherapy for early-stage prostate cancer (PREPaRE) study: protocol for a mixed-methods study of treatment decision-making in men with localised prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌前列腺切除术与放疗(PREPaRE)研究:一项局部前列腺癌男性治疗决策混合方法研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e018403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018403.
9
Decisional conflict in economically disadvantaged men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: baseline results from a shared decision-making trial.经济条件不利的新诊断前列腺癌男性的决策冲突:一项共同决策试验的基线结果
Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;120(17):2721-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28755. Epub 2014 May 9.
10
Changes in decisional conflict and decisional regret in patients with localised prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌患者决策冲突和决策后悔的变化。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):1959-69. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12470. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Depression, Anxiety, and Their Association to Health-Related Quality of Life in Men Commencing Prostate Cancer Treatment at Tertiary Hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦的三家三级医院中,接受前列腺癌治疗的男性的抑郁、焦虑及其与健康相关生活质量的关系。
Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221125561. doi: 10.1177/10732748221125561.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer at Tertiary Hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa.南非开普敦三级医院局部前列腺癌男性的 COVID-19 相关焦虑。
Cancer Control. 2021 Jan-Dec;28:10732748211024239. doi: 10.1177/10732748211024239.
2
Predicting decisional conflict: Anxiety and depression in shared decision making.预测决策冲突:共决中的焦虑和抑郁。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):1229-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.037. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
3
Shared decision making in surgery: A scoping review of the literature.手术中的共同决策:文献综述。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1241-1249. doi: 10.1111/hex.13105. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Preparing African American Men to Make Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Development and Pilot Testing of an Interactive Online Decision Aid.准备非裔美国男性做出明智的前列腺癌筛查决策:交互式在线决策辅助工具的开发和试点测试。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 5;8(5):e15502. doi: 10.2196/15502.
5
Decisional Conflict Scale Findings among Patients and Surrogates Making Health Decisions: Part II of an Anniversary Review.决策冲突量表在患者和代理人进行健康决策中的应用:周年回顾的第二部分。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):315-326. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19851346. Epub 2019 May 29.
6
Decisional conflict in surgical patients: Should surgeons care?外科患者的决策冲突:外科医生应该关注吗?
Can J Surg. 2019 Mar 22;62(3):1-3.
7
Influence of Men's Personality and Social Support on Treatment Decision-Making for Localized Prostate Cancer.男性人格特质与社会支持对局限性前列腺癌治疗决策的影响
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1467056. doi: 10.1155/2017/1467056. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
8
Patient Knowledge and Qualities of Treatment Decisions for Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌患者的知识与治疗决策的质量
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 May-Jun;30(3):288-297. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160298.
9
Decisional Conflict, Regret, and the Burden of Rational Decision Making.决策冲突、遗憾与理性决策的负担。
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jan;37(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16657544.
10
10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗 10 年后的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

南非前列腺癌男性的决策冲突与治疗方式相关,而与疾病知识无关:一项纵向前瞻性观察研究的基线结果。

Decisional Conflict is Associated with Treatment Modality and not Disease Knowledge in South African Men with Prostate Cancer: Baseline Results from a Longitudinal Prospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, 26697Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Tygerberg Academic Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, 26697Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2022 Jan-Dec;29:10732748221082791. doi: 10.1177/10732748221082791.

DOI:10.1177/10732748221082791
PMID:35442835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9024077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decisional conflict (DC) is a psychological construct that an individual experiences in making a decision that involves risk, loss, regret, or challenges to one's values. This study assessed DC in a cohort of South African men undergoing curative treatment for localised prostate cancer (LPC). The objectives were to (1) to examine the association between DC and prostate cancer knowledge (PCK), demographics, state anxiety, prostate cancer anxiety and time to treatment and (2) to compare levels of DC between treatment groups [prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation (RT)].

METHOD

Data, comprising the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Prostate Cancer Knowledge (PCK), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) and demographic data from 83 participants of a larger prospective longitudinal observational study examining depression, anxiety and health related quality of life (DAHCaP) were analysed.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 63 years (RP 61yrs and RT 65yrs; p< 0.001). Most were of mixed ancestry (72.3%). The total DCS scores between the treatment groups (RP 25.00 and RT 18.75; p = 0.037) and two DCS sub-scores-uncertainty (p 0.033, and support (p 0.048 were significantly higher in the RP group. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between state anxiety and time between diagnosis and treatment in the RP group (Spearman's rho = -0.368; p = 0.030). There was no correlation between the DCS score and PCK within each treatment group (Spearman's rho RP = -0.249 and RT = -0.001).

CONCLUSION

Decisional conflict was higher in men undergoing RP. Men were more anxious in the RP group regarding the time treatment was received from diagnosis. No correlation was observed between DC and PCK. Pre-surgical management of DC should include shared decision making (SDM) which is cognisant of patients' values facilitated by a customised decision aid.

摘要

背景

决策冲突(DC)是指个体在面临涉及风险、损失、遗憾或挑战个人价值观的决策时所经历的一种心理建构。本研究评估了南非男性接受局部前列腺癌(LPC)根治性治疗时的决策冲突。目的是:(1)检验决策冲突与前列腺癌知识(PCK)、人口统计学、状态焦虑、前列腺癌焦虑和治疗时间之间的关系;(2)比较治疗组(前列腺切除术[RP]和外照射放疗[RT])之间的决策冲突水平。

方法

从一项更大的前瞻性纵向观察研究中获取了 83 名参与者的数据,该研究评估了抑郁、焦虑和健康相关生活质量(DAHCaP),数据包括决策冲突量表(DCS)、前列腺癌知识(PCK)、状态特质焦虑量表(STAI-S)、前列腺癌焦虑量表(MAX-PC)和人口统计学数据。

结果

参与者的平均年龄为 63 岁(RP 组为 61 岁,RT 组为 65 岁;p<0.001)。大多数人具有混合血统(72.3%)。治疗组之间的总 DCS 评分(RP 组为 25.00,RT 组为 18.75;p=0.037)和两个 DCS 子评分(不确定性,p=0.033;支持,p=0.048)在 RP 组中明显更高。RP 组中状态焦虑与从诊断到治疗的时间之间存在显著负相关(Spearman 相关系数= -0.368;p=0.030)。每个治疗组中 DCS 评分与 PCK 之间均无相关性(RP 组 Spearman 相关系数= -0.249,RT 组 Spearman 相关系数= -0.001)。

结论

RP 组男性的决策冲突更高。RP 组男性在接受治疗的时间方面更加焦虑。DC 与 PCK 之间未观察到相关性。术前 DC 管理应包括共同决策(SDM),这是一种认知患者价值观的方法,需要使用定制的决策辅助工具来促进。