Suppr超能文献

肺功能测定在无呼吸系统症状糖尿病患者中的评估。

Assessment of Lung Functions by Spirometry in Diabetics with no Respiratory Complaints.

机构信息

Abvims and rml Hospital, New Delhi.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Apr;70(4):11-12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Diabetes produces a number of biochemical, morphological, and functional abnormalities that can affect the kidney, cardiovascular and neurological systems, as well as the skin and liver by altering collagen and elastic fibers. Diabetics' lungs show histological alterations such as thicker alveolar epithelium and pulmonary capillary basal lamina, resulting in decreased pulmonary elastic rebound and lung volume. Spirometry is a test to assess lung function in various respiratory diseases. The aim of our study was to assess the lung function by spirometry in patients with diabetes mellitus with no respiratory complaints and compare with lung function among healthy controls. Our additional intention was to find out the association between duration of disease and lung function impairment, if any, and further to compare impairment in lung function, if any, between diabetic patients with controlled and uncontrolled glycemic status. We also compared lung function between diabetic patient with diabetic complications and diabetic patient without diabetic complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Department of Medicine. Patients attending the Medicine OPD for Diabetes Mellitus with no respiratory complaints were interviewed. After application of appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria, qualifying subjects underwent detailed history, clinical examination, routine investigations and spirometric evaluation. A total of thirty cases were included in the study. A total of thirty age and sex matched apparently healthy subjects were also taken as controls.

OBSERVATION AND RESULTS

In our study, FEV1 (Measured Value) was normally distributed and, therefore, student t-test (2 tailed) was used to analyze the difference between the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the cases and controls (p value = 0.437). FVC was also normally distributed and, therefore, student t-test (2 tailed) was used to analyze the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the cases and controls (p value = 0.331). FEV1/FVC Ratio (Measured) was not normally distributed and therefore a non parametric test was used to analyze the groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the cases and controls (p value 0.336). The Mean ± SD of FEV1 (Measured Value) was 2.55 ± 0.66 for the diabetic subjects with duration 0- 5 Years, 2.21 ± 0.69 for those with duration 6-10 Years and 2.53 ± 0.67 for those with duration >10 years. No statistically significant difference was found between the three groups (p value 0.433) as assessed by One way ANNOVA. The Mean ± SD of FVC (Measured Value) was 3.19 ± 0.82 for diabetics with duration 0- 5 Years, 2.79 ± 0.81 for those with duration 6-10 Years and 3.29 ± 0.93 for those with duration >10 years. Again, no statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups (p value 0.523) as assessed by One way ANNOVA. The Mean ± SD of the FEV1/FVC (Measured Value) was 0.8 ± 0.05 for the subjects with diabetes duration 0- 5 Years, 0.79 ± 0.07 for those with duration 6-10 Years and 0.78 ± 0.04 for those with duration >10 years. No statistically significant difference was found between the 3 groups (p value 0.563). On basis of spirometry interpretation out of 30 cases, 2 patients (6.67%) were found to have a restrictive pattern of airway disease. On other hand, all controls were found to have a normal pattern of spirometry. No statistically significant difference between spirometric parameters of FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF25-75% was found between diabetic subjects with and without complications abd among diabetics with controlled and uncontrolled diabetes.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that spirometric variables FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC and FEF 25-75% were not different between diabetic subjects who were not having respiratory complaints and healthy controls. Also, duration of diabetes, diabetic control and presence of other diabetes related complications do not affect the lung function among diabetics. So, unlike eye and kidney, there is no need for screening for lung function abnormality among diabetics with no respiratory complaints.

摘要

背景与目的

糖尿病会产生许多生化、形态和功能异常,这些异常可通过改变胶原和弹性纤维而影响肾脏、心血管和神经系统以及皮肤和肝脏。糖尿病患者的肺部表现出组织学改变,例如肺泡上皮和肺毛细血管基底膜增厚,导致肺弹性回弹和肺容积减少。肺活量测定是一种评估各种呼吸系统疾病肺功能的测试。我们研究的目的是通过肺量计评估无呼吸系统症状的糖尿病患者的肺功能,并与健康对照组进行比较。我们的另一个目的是确定糖尿病患者的疾病持续时间与肺功能损害之间是否存在关联,如果存在,进一步比较血糖控制和未控制的糖尿病患者之间的肺功能损害是否存在差异。我们还比较了有和无糖尿病并发症的糖尿病患者之间的肺功能。

材料与方法

这是一项在医学系进行的横断面观察性研究。对糖尿病门诊就诊无呼吸系统症状的患者进行访谈。在应用适当的纳入和排除标准后,符合条件的受试者接受详细的病史、临床检查、常规检查和肺量计评估。共有 30 例患者纳入研究。还选择了 30 名年龄和性别匹配的健康受试者作为对照组。

观察与结果

在我们的研究中,FEV1(实测值)呈正态分布,因此使用双尾学生 t 检验(2 tailed)分析组间差异。病例组和对照组之间无统计学差异(p 值=0.437)。FVC 也呈正态分布,因此使用双尾学生 t 检验(2 tailed)分析组间差异。病例组和对照组之间无统计学差异(p 值=0.331)。FEV1/FVC 比值(实测)呈非正态分布,因此使用非参数检验分析组间差异。病例组和对照组之间无统计学差异(p 值 0.336)。FEV1(实测值)的均值±标准差为糖尿病组 0-5 年组 2.55±0.66,6-10 年组 2.21±0.69,>10 年组 2.53±0.67。三组间无统计学差异(p 值 0.433),采用单因素方差分析评估。FVC(实测值)的均值±标准差为 0-5 年组 3.19±0.82,6-10 年组 2.79±0.81,>10 年组 3.29±0.93。三组间无统计学差异(p 值 0.523),采用单因素方差分析评估。FEV1/FVC(实测值)的均值±标准差为 0-5 年组 0.8±0.05,6-10 年组 0.79±0.07,>10 年组 0.78±0.04。三组间无统计学差异(p 值 0.563)。在 30 例病例中,根据肺量计解读,有 2 例(6.67%)患者被发现存在气道疾病的限制模式。另一方面,所有对照组均表现出正常的肺量计模式。糖尿病患者伴有或不伴有并发症的 FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC 和 FEF25-75%等肺量计参数之间无统计学差异,以及血糖控制和未控制的糖尿病患者之间无统计学差异。

结论

本研究表明,无呼吸系统症状的糖尿病患者和健康对照组的肺功能指标 FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC 和 FEF 25-75%无差异。此外,糖尿病的持续时间、糖尿病的控制以及其他糖尿病相关并发症的存在并不影响糖尿病患者的肺功能。因此,与眼睛和肾脏不同,无需对无呼吸系统症状的糖尿病患者进行肺功能异常筛查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验