• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于使用笔和小额经济激励措施来提高多病症老年人群体瑜伽随机对照试验招募率的 2x2 随机因子交叉式实用随机试验。

A 2x2 randomised factorial SWAT of the use of a pen and small, financial incentive to improve recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of yoga for older adults with multimorbidity.

机构信息

York Trials Unit, ARRC Building, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

British Wheel of Yoga Qualifications, 25 Jermyn Street, Sleaford, NG34 7RU, UK.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2021 Apr 27;10:326. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52164.2. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.52164.2
PMID:35444795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8994083/
Abstract

Monetary and other incentives may increase recruitment to randomised controlled trials. 2x2 factorial 'study within a trial' of including a pen and/or £5 (GBP) in cash with a postal recruitment pack to increase the number of participants randomised into the host trial ('Gentle Years Yoga') for older adults with multimorbidity. Secondary outcomes: return, and time to return, of screening form, and the cost per additional participant randomised. Binary data were analysed using logistic regression and time to return using Cox proportional hazards regression.  818 potential host trial participants were included. Between those sent a pen (n=409) and not sent a pen (n=409), there was no evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants randomised (15 (3.7%) 11 (2.7%); OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.63-3.04), in returning a screening form (66 (16.1%) 61 (14.9%); OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75-1.61) nor in time to return the screening form (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.77-1.55). Between those sent £5 (n=409) and not sent £5 (n=409), there was no evidence of increased randomisation (14 (3.4%) 12 (2.9%); OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.54-2.57), but more screening forms were returned (77 (18.8%) 50 (12.2%); OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13-2.45) and there was decreased time to return screening form (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.22). No significant interaction between the interventions was observed. The cost per additional participant randomised was £32 and £1000 for the pen and £5, respectively. A small, monetary incentive did not result in more participants being randomised into the host trial but did encourage increased and faster response to the recruitment invitation. Since it is relatively costly, we do not recommend this intervention for use to increase recruitment in this population. Pens were cheaper but did not provide evidence of benefit.

摘要

经济激励和其他激励措施可能会增加随机对照试验的招募人数。一项“试验内 2x2 析因设计”研究,在邮寄招募包时加入一支笔和/或 5 英镑(GBP)现金,以增加患有多种疾病的老年人参加“温和岁月瑜伽”主试验的随机分组人数。次要结局指标:筛查表的返回率和返回时间,以及每增加一名随机分组参与者的成本。二分类数据采用逻辑回归分析,时间采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析。共纳入 818 名潜在的主试验参与者。在那些收到笔(n=409)和未收到笔(n=409)的参与者中,随机分组的参与者比例没有差异(15(3.7%) 11(2.7%);OR 1.38,95%CI 0.63-3.04),返回筛查表的比例(66(16.1%) 61(14.9%);OR 1.10,95%CI 0.75-1.61)和筛查表的返回时间(HR 1.09,95%CI 0.77-1.55)也没有差异。在那些收到 5 英镑(n=409)和未收到 5 英镑(n=409)的参与者中,随机分组的比例没有增加(14(3.4%) 12(2.9%);OR 1.18,95%CI 0.54-2.57),但返回的筛查表更多(77(18.8%) 50(12.2%);OR 1.67,95%CI 1.13-2.45),且筛查表的返回时间更短(HR 1.56,95%CI 1.09-2.22)。干预措施之间没有观察到显著的相互作用。每增加一名随机分组参与者的成本分别为 32 英镑和 5 英镑的笔和 1000 英镑。小的经济激励并没有导致更多的参与者被随机分配到主试验中,但确实鼓励了对招募邀请的更多和更快的响应。由于成本相对较高,我们不建议在该人群中使用这种干预措施来增加招募。笔更便宜,但没有提供获益的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/a78d1e007624/f1000research-10-121842-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/319adce151bc/f1000research-10-121842-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/8f39d1496c78/f1000research-10-121842-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/d5c725eb2de8/f1000research-10-121842-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/a78d1e007624/f1000research-10-121842-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/319adce151bc/f1000research-10-121842-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/8f39d1496c78/f1000research-10-121842-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/d5c725eb2de8/f1000research-10-121842-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63ab/8994085/a78d1e007624/f1000research-10-121842-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A 2x2 randomised factorial SWAT of the use of a pen and small, financial incentive to improve recruitment in a randomised controlled trial of yoga for older adults with multimorbidity.一项关于使用笔和小额经济激励措施来提高多病症老年人群体瑜伽随机对照试验招募率的 2x2 随机因子交叉式实用随机试验。
F1000Res. 2021 Apr 27;10:326. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52164.2. eCollection 2021.
2
Using pens as an incentive for trial recruitment of older adults: An embedded randomised controlled trial.使用钢笔作为招募老年人参与试验的激励措施:一项嵌入式随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2019 Mar 21;8:315. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18300.1. eCollection 2019.
3
Enclosing a pen in a postal questionnaire follow-up to increase response rate: a study within a trial.在邮寄问卷调查随访中附上一支笔以提高回复率:一项试验中的研究。
NIHR Open Res. 2023 Apr 20;2:53. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13324.2. eCollection 2022.
4
Chair-based yoga programme for older adults with multimorbidity: RCT with embedded economic and process evaluations.基于椅子的瑜伽方案在患有多种慢性病的老年人中的应用:RCT 嵌入经济和过程评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(53):1-152. doi: 10.3310/KPGN4216.
5
Conditional versus non-conditional incentives to maximise return of participant completed questionnaires in clinical trials: a cluster randomised study within a trial.条件激励与非条件激励对提高临床试验中参与者完成问卷回复率的效果比较:一项在临床试验内开展的整群随机研究。
Trials. 2023 Nov 7;24(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07604-6.
6
Evaluation of the effects of an offer of a monetary incentive on the rate of questionnaire return during follow-up of a clinical trial: a randomised study within a trial.评估货币激励措施对临床试验随访期间问卷回收率的影响:一项试验中的随机研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 15;16:82. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0180-9.
7
Including a pen and/or cover letter, containing social incentive text, had no effect on questionnaire response rate: a factorial randomised controlled Study within a Trial.包含一支笔和/或求职信(其中含有社会激励性文字)对问卷回复率没有影响:一项试验中的析因随机对照研究。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 17;9:623. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23767.2. eCollection 2020.
8
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3(12):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2.
9
Enclosing a pen to improve response rate to postal questionnaire: an embedded randomised controlled trial.随信附上一支笔以提高邮寄问卷的回复率:一项嵌入式随机对照试验。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 9;9:577. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23651.1. eCollection 2020.
10
Yoga for older adults with multimorbidity (the Gentle Years Yoga Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.多病症老年人群的瑜伽干预(悠悠岁月瑜伽试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Apr 12;22(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05217-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Chair-based yoga programme for older adults with multimorbidity: RCT with embedded economic and process evaluations.基于椅子的瑜伽方案在患有多种慢性病的老年人中的应用:RCT 嵌入经济和过程评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Sep;28(53):1-152. doi: 10.3310/KPGN4216.
2
Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.在一项评估随机对照试验招募和保留策略的试验中进行研究:从 PROMETHEUS 研究计划中吸取的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(2):1-114. doi: 10.3310/HTQW3107.
3
"And then I found $5": Optimizing recruitment efficiency in remote clinical trials.
“然后我找到了5美元”:优化远程临床试验中的招募效率
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Apr 20;7(1):e102. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.533. eCollection 2023.