York Trials Unit, ARRC Building, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
British Wheel of Yoga Qualifications, 25 Jermyn Street, Sleaford, NG34 7RU, UK.
F1000Res. 2021 Apr 27;10:326. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.52164.2. eCollection 2021.
Monetary and other incentives may increase recruitment to randomised controlled trials. 2x2 factorial 'study within a trial' of including a pen and/or £5 (GBP) in cash with a postal recruitment pack to increase the number of participants randomised into the host trial ('Gentle Years Yoga') for older adults with multimorbidity. Secondary outcomes: return, and time to return, of screening form, and the cost per additional participant randomised. Binary data were analysed using logistic regression and time to return using Cox proportional hazards regression. 818 potential host trial participants were included. Between those sent a pen (n=409) and not sent a pen (n=409), there was no evidence of a difference in the proportion of participants randomised (15 (3.7%) 11 (2.7%); OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.63-3.04), in returning a screening form (66 (16.1%) 61 (14.9%); OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75-1.61) nor in time to return the screening form (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.77-1.55). Between those sent £5 (n=409) and not sent £5 (n=409), there was no evidence of increased randomisation (14 (3.4%) 12 (2.9%); OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.54-2.57), but more screening forms were returned (77 (18.8%) 50 (12.2%); OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13-2.45) and there was decreased time to return screening form (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.22). No significant interaction between the interventions was observed. The cost per additional participant randomised was £32 and £1000 for the pen and £5, respectively. A small, monetary incentive did not result in more participants being randomised into the host trial but did encourage increased and faster response to the recruitment invitation. Since it is relatively costly, we do not recommend this intervention for use to increase recruitment in this population. Pens were cheaper but did not provide evidence of benefit.
经济激励和其他激励措施可能会增加随机对照试验的招募人数。一项“试验内 2x2 析因设计”研究,在邮寄招募包时加入一支笔和/或 5 英镑(GBP)现金,以增加患有多种疾病的老年人参加“温和岁月瑜伽”主试验的随机分组人数。次要结局指标:筛查表的返回率和返回时间,以及每增加一名随机分组参与者的成本。二分类数据采用逻辑回归分析,时间采用 Cox 比例风险回归分析。共纳入 818 名潜在的主试验参与者。在那些收到笔(n=409)和未收到笔(n=409)的参与者中,随机分组的参与者比例没有差异(15(3.7%) 11(2.7%);OR 1.38,95%CI 0.63-3.04),返回筛查表的比例(66(16.1%) 61(14.9%);OR 1.10,95%CI 0.75-1.61)和筛查表的返回时间(HR 1.09,95%CI 0.77-1.55)也没有差异。在那些收到 5 英镑(n=409)和未收到 5 英镑(n=409)的参与者中,随机分组的比例没有增加(14(3.4%) 12(2.9%);OR 1.18,95%CI 0.54-2.57),但返回的筛查表更多(77(18.8%) 50(12.2%);OR 1.67,95%CI 1.13-2.45),且筛查表的返回时间更短(HR 1.56,95%CI 1.09-2.22)。干预措施之间没有观察到显著的相互作用。每增加一名随机分组参与者的成本分别为 32 英镑和 5 英镑的笔和 1000 英镑。小的经济激励并没有导致更多的参与者被随机分配到主试验中,但确实鼓励了对招募邀请的更多和更快的响应。由于成本相对较高,我们不建议在该人群中使用这种干预措施来增加招募。笔更便宜,但没有提供获益的证据。