• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较疼痛诱发与标准 40 分钟倾斜试验台检查对血管迷走性晕厥的确诊。

Comparison of pain-provoked versus standard 40-min tilt table test for the conformation of vasovagal syncope.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug;43(8):4847-4851. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06079-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10072-022-06079-8
PMID:35449384
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tilt table test represents a valuable diagnostic method in assessing patients with transient loss of consciousness and confirming the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope. However, the test lacks standardization, and various protocols exist in different centers. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in sensitivity and time-to-syncope of tilt table test with a painful stimulus provocation compared to standard test with no provocation.

METHODS

This was a prospective study that included consecutive patients diagnosed with vasovagal syncope who were referred for tilt table testing. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group 1 with pain provocation after the first 10 min of upright position and group 2 with no provocation with further 30 min of tilt in both groups.

RESULTS

In group 1, 66 (78.6%) patients developed syncope while in group 2, 35 (44.3%) patients had syncope (p < 0.001). This represents an increase of 34.3% in TTT sensitivity with the application of painful provocation. According to results of the Cox regression, the hazard for developing syncope after the 10th min of the tilt for group 2 was 0.275 of the hazard of group 1 (95% C.I. 0.170-0.444, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pain provocation is a useful method for increasing sensitivity and shortening the duration of tilt table testing.

摘要

背景

倾斜试验是评估一过性意识丧失患者和确认血管迷走性晕厥诊断的一种有价值的诊断方法。然而,该测试缺乏标准化,不同中心存在各种方案。本研究的目的是比较疼痛刺激诱发与标准无刺激倾斜试验在敏感性和晕厥时间方面的差异。

方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了连续诊断为血管迷走性晕厥并转诊进行倾斜试验的患者。患者被随机分配到两组:第 1 组在直立 10 分钟后进行疼痛刺激,第 2 组在两组中进一步倾斜 30 分钟时无刺激。

结果

第 1 组 66 例(78.6%)患者出现晕厥,第 2 组 35 例(44.3%)患者出现晕厥(p<0.001)。这表示疼痛刺激的应用使 TTT 的敏感性增加了 34.3%。根据 Cox 回归的结果,对于第 2 组,倾斜 10 分钟后发生晕厥的危险是第 1 组的 0.275(95%CI 0.170-0.444,p<0.001)。

结论

疼痛刺激是提高倾斜试验敏感性和缩短倾斜试验时间的有用方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of pain-provoked versus standard 40-min tilt table test for the conformation of vasovagal syncope.比较疼痛诱发与标准 40 分钟倾斜试验台检查对血管迷走性晕厥的确诊。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug;43(8):4847-4851. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06079-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
'Front-loaded' head-up tilt table testing: validation of a rapid first line nitrate-provoked tilt protocol for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope.“预负荷”头高位倾斜试验:用于诊断血管迷走性晕厥的快速一线硝酸盐激发倾斜方案的验证
Age Ageing. 2008 Jul;37(4):411-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn098.
3
Short pain-provoked head-up tilt test for the confirmation of vasovagal syncope.短时间疼痛诱发的头高位倾斜试验用于血管迷走性晕厥的确诊。
Neurol Sci. 2013 Jun;34(6):869-73. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1138-2. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
4
Duration of head-up tilt test for patients with suspected vasovagal syncope.疑似血管迷走性晕厥患者的直立倾斜试验持续时间。
Europace. 2011 Apr;13(4):576-80. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur015. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
5
New classification of haemodynamics of vasovagal syncope: beyond the VASIS classification. Analysis of the pre-syncopal phase of the tilt test without and with nitroglycerin challenge. Vasovagal Syncope International Study.血管迷走性晕厥血流动力学的新分类:超越VASIS分类。无硝酸甘油激发和有硝酸甘油激发时倾斜试验晕厥前期分析。血管迷走性晕厥国际研究。
Europace. 2000 Jan;2(1):66-76. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1999.0064.
6
[Head-up tilt test].[头高位倾斜试验]
J Cardiol. 2000 Mar;35 Suppl 1:17-21.
7
Blood pressure oscillations during tilt testing as a predictive marker of vasovagal syncope.倾斜试验中血压波动作为血管迷走性晕厥的预测标志物。
Europace. 2009 Dec;11(12):1696-701. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup338. Epub 2009 Oct 31.
8
[Estimation of head-up tilt test in diagnosis of syncope of unknown origin. Can we come up with better results?].[头高位倾斜试验在不明原因晕厥诊断中的评估。我们能否得出更好的结果?]
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2002 Jul;108(1):639-46.
9
Comparison of tilt angles and provocative agents (edrophonium and isoproterenol) to improve head-upright tilt-table testing.比较倾斜角度和激发剂(依酚氯铵和异丙肾上腺素)以改进头直立倾斜试验。
Am J Cardiol. 1998 Feb 1;81(3):346-51. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00915-6.
10
The Differences in the Diagnostic Profile in Children with Vasovagal Syncope between the Result of Head-Up Tilt Table Test.血管迷走性晕厥患儿直立倾斜试验结果与诊断特征的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124524.

本文引用的文献

1
Recommendations for tilt table testing and other provocative cardiovascular autonomic tests in conditions that may cause transient loss of consciousness : Consensus statement of the European Federation of Autonomic Societies (EFAS) endorsed by the American Autonomic Society (AAS) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN).倾斜台试验和其他可能导致短暂性意识丧失的情况下的心血管自主神经激发试验推荐:欧洲自主神经学会(EFAS)共识声明,得到美国自主神经学会(AAS)和欧洲神经病学会(EAN)的认可。
Clin Auton Res. 2021 Jun;31(3):369-384. doi: 10.1007/s10286-020-00738-6. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
2
Baroreflex Dysfunction.压力感受器反射功能障碍
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):163-178. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1509723.
3
2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope.
2018年欧洲心脏病学会晕厥诊断和管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy037.
4
Clinical history in management of suspected syncope: A powerful diagnostic tool.疑似晕厥管理中的临床病史:一种强大的诊断工具。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(6):651-7. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2014.0097.
5
Venepuncture during head-up tilt testing in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope – implications for the test protocol.怀疑血管迷走性晕厥患者行头高位倾斜试验时的静脉穿刺——对试验方案的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Feb;22(2):389-94. doi: 10.1111/ene.12590. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
6
Head-up tilt testing for diagnosing vasovagal syncope: a meta-analysis.用于诊断血管迷走性晕厥的头高位倾斜试验:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15;169(4):e49-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.114. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
7
Short pain-provoked head-up tilt test for the confirmation of vasovagal syncope.短时间疼痛诱发的头高位倾斜试验用于血管迷走性晕厥的确诊。
Neurol Sci. 2013 Jun;34(6):869-73. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1138-2. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
8
High diagnostic yield and accuracy of history, physical examination, and ECG in patients with transient loss of consciousness in FAST: the Fainting Assessment study.FAST中意识短暂丧失患者病史、体格检查及心电图的高诊断率与准确性:晕厥评估研究
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Jan;19(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.00984.x. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
9
Study of the efficiency of the head-up tilt test with nitroglycerin challenge in the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope.硝酸甘油激发试验直立倾斜试验在血管迷走性晕厥诊断中的效率研究
Rom J Intern Med. 2004;42(3):585-94.
10
Vasovagal syncope and Darwinian fitness.血管迷走性晕厥与达尔文适应性
Clin Auton Res. 2005 Apr;15(2):126-9. doi: 10.1007/s10286-005-0244-0.