Hughes David M, Mordino Jason
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Jul-Aug;62(4):1162-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.03.023. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
On March 4, 2022, the American Medical Association (AMA) released a statement in response to the Biden administration's plan of a test-to-treat plan allowing pharmacists to serve as locations to test and provide prescriptions for oral antiviral therapies for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after a positive test result. The statement by AMA contradicts and underrepresents the impact pharmacists have on clinical practice. Pharmacists have been a crucial part of many efforts including mass vaccination efforts and furnishing of prescriptions for other complex disease states (e.g., pre-exposure prophylaxis and postexposure prophylaxis therapy). Furthermore, health systems have proven that novel approaches to mitigate operational and clinical barriers to COVID-19 therapies may offset the increased demand needed by communities. Herein, this commentary will discuss a viewpoint and counterpoint to the statement put out by AMA, with a focus on pharmacists.
2022年3月4日,美国医学协会(AMA)发表了一份声明,回应拜登政府的“检测即治疗”计划。该计划允许药剂师所在地点在检测结果呈阳性后,为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)检测并提供口服抗病毒治疗处方。美国医学协会的声明与药剂师对临床实践的影响相矛盾,且表述不充分。药剂师一直是包括大规模疫苗接种工作以及为其他复杂疾病状态(如暴露前预防和暴露后预防治疗)提供处方等多项工作的关键组成部分。此外,卫生系统已经证明,减轻COVID-19治疗的操作和临床障碍的新方法可能会抵消社区所需增加的需求。在此,本评论将讨论对美国医学协会声明的一种观点及相反观点,重点关注药剂师。