Recognizing Racial Disparities in Postoperative Outcomes of Gender Affirming Surgery.

Given the increasing frequency with which gender affirming surgery (GAS) is performed, understanding risk factors for poor outcomes is imperative. Recent investigations highlight inferior health outcomes experienced by Black transgender and gender expansive (TGE) individuals. Herein, we evaluate the relationship between race and postoperative outcomes in TGE patients undergoing GAS, utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). We conducted a retrospective review of ACS NSQIP from 2010 to 2018. Patients with a primary diagnosis of gender dysphoria undergoing GAS were identified and grouped by race. Patient characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes were recorded. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes across groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of complications. We included 2308 patients (1780 White, 419 Black, 109 Asian). Gender, body mass index, smoking status, and type of surgery performed differed significantly between groups ( < 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in 30-day readmission and organ space surgical site infection (SSI) across groups ( = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for confounders, revealed that Black patients had higher odds of reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 1.82,  = 0.047), 30-day readmission (OR 2.46,  = 0.003), and organ space SSI (OR 4.65,  = 0.024) than White patients. We found that race was an independent predictor of important short-term postoperative outcomes in GAS. Inclusive clinical research, effective engagement with the TGE community, and surgery-specific enhanced recovery after surgery protocols may help address disparities, but we must acknowledge race as a social determinant of health.