Allison Derek B, Zhang M Lisa, Vohra Poonam, VandenBussche Christopher J
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 8;12(4):931. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040931.
Since the release of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), the assessment of urine cytology specimens has primarily focused on the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) and carcinoma in situ (CIS). Fortunately, the malignant cells in these lesions tend to be loosely cohesive, resulting in the natural exfoliation of individual malignant cells into the urine. However, HGUC/CIS lesions occasionally exfoliate larger fragments which can be difficult to assess due to cellular overlap and fragment three-dimensionality. Furthermore, reactive benign urothelial fragments and fragments from low-grade urothelial neoplasms (LGUN) may also be seen in urine specimens and contain atypical cytomorphologic features. As a result, the significance of urothelial tissue fragments (UTFs) is often unclear. Herein, we discuss the literature on UTFs before and after the implementation of TPS, as well as strategies to help overcome this diagnostic challenge.
自《巴黎泌尿细胞学报告系统》(TPS)发布以来,尿液细胞学标本的评估主要集中在高级别尿路上皮癌(HGUC)和原位癌(CIS)的检测上。幸运的是,这些病变中的恶性细胞往往黏附性较差,导致单个恶性细胞自然脱落到尿液中。然而,HGUC/CIS病变偶尔会脱落较大的碎片,由于细胞重叠和碎片的三维结构,这些碎片可能难以评估。此外,尿液标本中也可能出现反应性良性尿路上皮碎片和低级别尿路上皮肿瘤(LGUN)的碎片,并具有非典型的细胞形态特征。因此,尿路上皮组织碎片(UTFs)的意义往往不明确。在此,我们讨论了TPS实施前后关于UTFs的文献,以及有助于克服这一诊断挑战的策略。