Suppr超能文献

最后一个粗略编码课程:联想和范畴语义处理的半球相似性。

The last course of coarse coding: Hemispheric similarities in associative and categorical semantic processing.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.

Department of Computing Studies and Information Systems, Douglas College, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Lang. 2022 Jun;229:105123. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105123. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

Abstract

To test theories that posit differences in how semantic information is represented in the cerebral hemispheres, we assessed semantic priming for associatively and categorically related prime-target pairs that were graded in relatedness strength. Visual half-field presentation was used to bias processing to the right or left hemisphere, and event-related potential (ERP) and behavioral responses were measured while participants completed a semantic relatedness judgement task. Contrary to theories positing representational differences across the cerebral hemispheres, in two experiments using (1) centralized prime presentation and lateralized targets and (2) lateralized primes and targets, we found similar priming patterns across the two hemispheres at the level of semantic access (N400), on later measures of explicit processing (late positive complex; LPC), and in behavioral response speeds and accuracy. We argue that hemispheric differences, when they arise, are more likely due to differences in task demands than in how the hemispheres fundamentally represent semantic information.

摘要

为了验证那些认为大脑两半球在语义信息表示上存在差异的理论,我们评估了联想和类别相关的启动-目标对的语义启动,这些对在关联性强度上是分级的。使用视觉半视野呈现来偏向于右或左半球的处理,同时测量参与者在完成语义关联性判断任务时的事件相关电位 (ERP) 和行为反应。与那些假设大脑两半球存在表示差异的理论相反,在使用 (1) 集中呈现启动和侧化目标,以及 (2) 侧化启动和目标的两个实验中,我们发现,在语义获取水平(N400)、在后期的显式处理测量(晚期正复合;LPC)以及在行为反应速度和准确性方面,两个半球的启动模式相似。我们认为,当出现半球差异时,更可能是由于任务需求的差异,而不是由于半球在根本上如何表示语义信息的差异。

相似文献

1
The last course of coarse coding: Hemispheric similarities in associative and categorical semantic processing.
Brain Lang. 2022 Jun;229:105123. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105123. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
2
Hemispheric differences in strong versus weak semantic priming: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Brain Lang. 2007 Jan;100(1):23-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.117. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
3
Hemispheric differences in the time-course of semantic priming processes: evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs).
Brain Cogn. 2007 Mar;63(2):123-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.10.006. Epub 2007 Jan 4.
4
Summing it up: semantic activation processes in the two hemispheres as revealed by event-related potentials.
Brain Res. 2008 Oct 3;1233:146-59. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.043. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
5
Hemispheric contributions to semantic activation: a divided visual field and event-related potential investigation of time-course.
Brain Res. 2009 Aug 11;1284:125-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.053. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
6
Accessing semantic person knowledge: temporal dynamics of nonstrategic categorical and associative priming.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Feb;23(2):447-59. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21432. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
7
Using event-related potentials to examine hemispheric differences in semantic processing.
Brain Cogn. 2003 Nov;53(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00095-2.
8
Electrophysiological correlates of cross-linguistic semantic integration in hearing signers: N400 and LPC.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jul;59:57-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
9
Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres: the coarse coding hypothesis revisited.
Brain Res. 2007 Jun 11;1153:144-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.046. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
10
Hemispheric differences in the recruitment of semantic processing mechanisms.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Nov;48(13):3772-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.
Psychophysiology. 2022 Jan;59(1):e13940. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13940. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Chemistry of the Adaptive Mind: Lessons from Dopamine.
Neuron. 2019 Oct 9;104(1):113-131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.035.
2
Factors Influencing Right Hemisphere Engagement During Metaphor Comprehension.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 28;9:414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00414. eCollection 2018.
3
The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
4
The role of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in semantic processing: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Oct;91:480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
5
Hemispheric asymmetry in event knowledge activation during incremental language comprehension: A visual half-field ERP study.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:252-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
6
Language knowledge and event knowledge in language use.
Cogn Psychol. 2015 May;78:1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1994 Winter;6(1):26-45. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.26.
9
Why bilateral damage is worse than unilateral damage to the brain.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec;25(12):2107-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00441. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
10
Two sides of meaning: the scalp-recorded n400 reflects distinct contributions from the cerebral hemispheres.
Front Psychol. 2013 Apr 23;4:181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00181. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验