Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States.
Department of Computing Studies and Information Systems, Douglas College, Canada.
Brain Lang. 2022 Jun;229:105123. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105123. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
To test theories that posit differences in how semantic information is represented in the cerebral hemispheres, we assessed semantic priming for associatively and categorically related prime-target pairs that were graded in relatedness strength. Visual half-field presentation was used to bias processing to the right or left hemisphere, and event-related potential (ERP) and behavioral responses were measured while participants completed a semantic relatedness judgement task. Contrary to theories positing representational differences across the cerebral hemispheres, in two experiments using (1) centralized prime presentation and lateralized targets and (2) lateralized primes and targets, we found similar priming patterns across the two hemispheres at the level of semantic access (N400), on later measures of explicit processing (late positive complex; LPC), and in behavioral response speeds and accuracy. We argue that hemispheric differences, when they arise, are more likely due to differences in task demands than in how the hemispheres fundamentally represent semantic information.
为了验证那些认为大脑两半球在语义信息表示上存在差异的理论,我们评估了联想和类别相关的启动-目标对的语义启动,这些对在关联性强度上是分级的。使用视觉半视野呈现来偏向于右或左半球的处理,同时测量参与者在完成语义关联性判断任务时的事件相关电位 (ERP) 和行为反应。与那些假设大脑两半球存在表示差异的理论相反,在使用 (1) 集中呈现启动和侧化目标,以及 (2) 侧化启动和目标的两个实验中,我们发现,在语义获取水平(N400)、在后期的显式处理测量(晚期正复合;LPC)以及在行为反应速度和准确性方面,两个半球的启动模式相似。我们认为,当出现半球差异时,更可能是由于任务需求的差异,而不是由于半球在根本上如何表示语义信息的差异。