2nd Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
2 Department of Ophthalmology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 4;37(5):668-675. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2069470. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
To investigate potential laboratory and imaging biomarkers as treatment response predictors to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The study included 36 treatment naïve patients with DME, treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and followed-up for 12 months. At baseline, all participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, dilated fundoscopy, optical coherence tomography, color fundus photography and fluorescein angiography, while full blood count and biochemical analysis of various parameters was also performed. At month 12, treatment response was examined and classified as "favorable" or "non-response". Potential associations between laboratory/imaging biomarkers and treatment response were assessed.
Univariate analysis showed that favorable response at month 12 after initiation of anti-VEGF treatment was correlated with baseline central subfield thickness (CST)≤405 μm ( < .001), absence of subretinal fluid ( = .034), absence of exudates ( = .041), absence of disorganization of the inner retinal layers ( = .037), intact ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) ( < .001 and = .002, respectively), absence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) ( = .040) and absence of macular ischemia ( = .042), while increased lipoprotein(a) was associated with no treatment response ( = .025). At the multivariate analysis, CST was found to be independent predictor of treatment response, while EZ, ELM and ERM were found to predict treatment response perfectly and they could not be entered in the model.
Intact EZ and ELM, absence of ERM and CST≤405 μm at baseline can predict favorable treatment response in patients with treatment naïve DME, while no correlation with baseline laboratory parameters was found.
研究潜在的实验室和影像学生物标志物,作为预测糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者对玻璃体腔内抗血管内皮生长因子(抗-VEGF)药物治疗反应的指标。
本研究纳入了 36 例未经治疗的 DME 患者,接受玻璃体腔内抗 VEGF 药物治疗并随访 12 个月。在基线时,所有患者均接受最佳矫正视力(BCVA)测量、散瞳眼底检查、光学相干断层扫描、眼底彩色照相和荧光素血管造影,同时还进行了全血细胞计数和各种参数的生化分析。在第 12 个月时,检查治疗反应并分为“有效”或“无反应”。评估了实验室/影像学生物标志物与治疗反应之间的潜在关联。
单因素分析显示,抗 VEGF 治疗开始后第 12 个月的良好反应与基线中央视网膜神经纤维层厚度(CST)≤405μm(<0.001)、无视网膜下液( =0.034)、无渗出物( =0.041)、内视网膜层结构无紊乱( =0.037)、完整的椭圆体带(EZ)和外界膜(ELM)(<0.001 和 =0.002)、无视网膜内膜(ERM)( =0.040)和无黄斑缺血( =0.042)有关,而脂蛋白(a)增加与无治疗反应有关( =0.025)。在多因素分析中,CST 被发现是治疗反应的独立预测因素,而 EZ、ELM 和 ERM 则被发现可以完美预测治疗反应,它们不能被纳入模型。
基线时 EZ 和 ELM 完整、无 ERM 和 CST≤405μm 可预测未经治疗的 DME 患者的治疗反应良好,而与基线实验室参数无相关性。