Pothineni Naga Venkata K, Cherian Tharian, Patel Neel, Smietana Jeffrey, Frankel David S, Deo Rajat, Epstein Andrew E, Marchlinski Francis E, Schaller Robert D
Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2022 Apr 15;13(4):4947-4953. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130407. eCollection 2022 Apr.
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an appealing alternative to transvenous ICD systems. However, data on indications for S-ICD explantations are sparse. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and indications for S-ICD explantation at a large tertiary referral center. We conducted a retrospective study of all S-ICD explantations performed from 2014-2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, implantation characteristics, and indications for explantation were collected. A total of 64 patients underwent S-ICD explantation during the study period. During that time, there were 410 S-ICD implantations at our institution, of which 53 (12.9%) were explanted with a mean duration from implant to explant of 19.7 ± 20.1 months. The mean age of the patients at explantation was 44.8 ± 15.3 years, and 42% (n = 27) were women. The indication for S-ICD implantation was primary prevention in 58% and secondary prevention in 42% of patients, respectively. The most common reason for explantation was infection (32.8%), followed by abnormal sensing (25%) and the need for pacing (18.8%). Those who underwent S-ICD explantation for pacing indications were significantly older (55.7 ± 13.6 vs. 42.3 ± 14.6 years, = 0.005) with a wider QRS duration (111 ± 19 vs. 98 ± 19 ms, = 0.03) at device implantation compared to patients who underwent explantation for other indications. The incidence of S-ICD explantation in a large tertiary practice was 12.9%. While infection was the indication for one-third of the explantations, a significant number of explantations were due to sensing abnormalities and the need for pacing. These data may have implications for patient selection for S-ICD implantation.
皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)是经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器系统的一种有吸引力的替代方案。然而,关于S-ICD取出术适应证的数据却很稀少。本研究的目的是评估一家大型三级转诊中心S-ICD取出术的发生率及适应证。我们对2014年至2020年期间进行的所有S-ICD取出术进行了一项回顾性研究。收集了人口统计学、合并症、植入特征及取出术适应证等数据。在研究期间,共有64例患者接受了S-ICD取出术。在此期间,我们机构共植入了410台S-ICD,其中53台(12.9%)被取出,从植入到取出的平均时长为19.7±20.1个月。取出时患者的平均年龄为44.8±15.3岁,42%(n = 27)为女性。S-ICD植入的适应证分别为58%的患者是一级预防,42%的患者是二级预防。最常见的取出原因是感染(32.8%),其次是感知异常(25%)和起搏需求(18.8%)。因起搏适应证而接受S-ICD取出术的患者在植入设备时年龄显著更大(55.7±13.6岁 vs. 42.3±14.6岁,P = 0.005),QRS时限更宽(111±19 ms vs. 98±19 ms,P = 0.03),与因其他适应证而接受取出术的患者相比。在一家大型三级医疗机构中,S-ICD取出术的发生率为12.9%。虽然感染是三分之一取出术的适应证,但相当数量的取出术是由于感知异常和起搏需求。这些数据可能对S-ICD植入的患者选择有影响。