Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States.
Department of Computer Information Systems, Bentley University, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):447-455. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1745828. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
Order sets are a clinical decision support (CDS) tool in computerized provider order entry systems. Order set use has been associated with improved quality of care. Particularly related to opioids and pain management, order sets have been shown to standardize and reduce the prescription of opioids. However, clinician-level barriers often limit the uptake of this CDS modality.
To identify the barriers to order sets adoption, we surveyed clinicians on their training, knowledge, and perceptions related to order sets for pain management.
We distributed a cross-sectional survey between October 2020 and April 2021 to clinicians eligible to place orders at two campuses of a major academic medical center. Survey questions were adapted from the widely used framework of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. We hypothesize that performance expectancy (PE) and facilitating conditions (FC) are associated with order set use. Survey responses were analyzed using logistic regression.
The intention to use order sets for pain management was associated with PE to existing order sets, social influence (SI) by leadership and peers, and FC for electronic health record (EHR) training and function integration. Intention to use did not significantly differ by gender or clinician role. Moderate differences were observed in the perception of the effort of, and FC for, order set use across gender and roles of clinicians, particularly emergency medicine and internal medicine departments.
This study attempts to identify barriers to the adoption of order sets for pain management and suggests future directions in designing and implementing CDS systems that can improve order sets adoption by clinicians. Study findings imply the importance of order set effectiveness, peer influence, and EHR integration in determining the acceptability of the order sets.
医嘱集是计算机化医嘱输入系统中的一种临床决策支持 (CDS) 工具。医嘱集的使用与改善医疗质量相关。特别是在阿片类药物和疼痛管理方面,医嘱集已被证明可以标准化和减少阿片类药物的处方。然而,临床医生层面的障碍常常限制了这种 CDS 模式的采用。
为了确定医嘱集采用的障碍,我们调查了临床医生在疼痛管理方面与医嘱集相关的培训、知识和认知。
我们于 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 4 月期间向两个主要学术医疗中心的符合医嘱权限的临床医生分发了一份横断面调查。调查问题改编自广泛使用的统一技术接受和使用理论框架。我们假设绩效期望 (PE) 和便利条件 (FC) 与医嘱集的使用相关。使用逻辑回归分析调查结果。
疼痛管理医嘱集的使用意向与对现有医嘱集的 PE、领导力和同事的社会影响 (SI) 以及电子病历 (EHR) 培训和功能集成的 FC 相关。使用意向在性别或临床医生角色方面没有显著差异。在性别和临床医生角色方面,对医嘱集使用的努力程度和 FC 的感知存在中等差异,特别是在急诊医学和内科部门。
本研究试图确定疼痛管理医嘱集采用的障碍,并为设计和实施 CDS 系统提供未来方向,以提高临床医生对医嘱集的接受度。研究结果表明,医嘱集的有效性、同伴影响和 EHR 集成在确定医嘱集的可接受性方面具有重要意义。