Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 8;13(e3):e1110-e1116. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003681.
Classically, hot flash studies included a baseline period of 1 week or longer. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of a 1-day baseline diary to a traditional 1-week diary.
Raw data from 5 pilot studies and 15 phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs), all of which used a 1-week baseline period, were obtained. Descriptive statistics were used to describe day-by-day variations in hot flash frequencies and scores, during the baseline week. Additional analyses evaluated whether the conclusions from any of the individual pilot studies would have been changed if only a 1-day baseline period had been used. For the RCTs, p values were recalculated using mixed models, adjusting for the baseline value by including it as a covariate.
A total of 2573 participants were included. On average, participants had 8.5 hot flashes per day on day 1. Mean hot flash frequencies and scores on subsequent days (days 2-7) were within 6% of day 1 values. When comparing a 1-day to a 1-week baseline period, there was an absolute difference of only 0.29 hot flashes per day (SD 2.25). Reanalysis for each pilot study revealed that no individual study conclusions would have been altered by a shorter baseline. For the RCTs, a shorter baseline period changed the results of only 1 of 24 comparisons from statistically significant to not significant, or vice versa.
A 1-day hot flash diary appears to accurately reflect the true frequency and severity of baseline symptoms in appropriately sized cohorts.
经典的热潮研究包括 1 周或更长的基线期。本研究的目的是比较 1 天基线日记与传统 1 周日记的准确性。
获得了 5 项试点研究和 15 项 III 期随机对照试验(RCT)的原始数据,所有这些研究都使用了 1 周的基线期。描述性统计用于描述基线周内热潮频率和得分的逐日变化。额外的分析评估了如果仅使用 1 天的基线期,任何个别试点研究的结论是否会发生变化。对于 RCT,使用混合模型重新计算 p 值,通过将基线值作为协变量包含在内来调整基线值。
共有 2573 名参与者被纳入。平均而言,参与者在第 1 天有 8.5 次热潮。随后几天(第 2-7 天)的平均热潮频率和得分与第 1 天的值相差 6%以内。当比较 1 天与 1 周的基线期时,每天仅存在 0.29 次热潮的绝对差异(SD 2.25)。对每项试点研究的重新分析表明,较短的基线期不会改变任何一项研究的结论。对于 RCT,较短的基线期仅改变了 24 项比较中的 1 项的结果,从统计学上显著变为不显著,反之亦然。
1 天的热潮日记似乎可以准确反映适当大小队列中基线症状的真实频率和严重程度。