• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同出生体重图表中连续体重百分位数与严重围生期不良结局的关联:一项集群随机试验的二次分析。

Associations of severe adverse perinatal outcomes among continuous birth weight percentiles on different birth weight charts: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04680-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04680-5
PMID:35490210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9055757/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify neonatal risk for severe adverse perinatal outcomes across birth weight centiles in two Dutch and one international birth weight chart.

BACKGROUND

Growth restricted newborns have not reached their intrinsic growth potential in utero and are at risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality. There is no golden standard for the confirmation of the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction after birth. Estimated fetal weight and birth weight below the 10 percentile are generally used as proxy for growth restriction. The choice of birth weight chart influences the specific cut-off by which birth weight is defined as abnormal, thereby triggering clinical management. Ideally, this cut-off should discriminate appropriately between newborns at low and at high risk of severe adverse perinatal outcomes and consequently correctly inform clinical management.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the IUGR Risk Selection (IRIS) study. Newborns (n = 12 953) of women with a low-risk status at the start of pregnancy and that received primary antenatal care in the Netherlands were included. We examined the distribution of severe adverse perinatal outcomes across birth weight centiles for three birth weight charts (Visser, Hoftiezer and INTERGROWTH) by categorizing birth weight centile groups and comparing the prognostic performance for severe adverse perinatal outcomes. Severe adverse perinatal outcomes were defined as a composite of one or more of the following: perinatal death, Apgar score < 4 at 5 min, impaired consciousness, asphyxia, seizures, assisted ventilation, septicemia, meningitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, or necrotizing enterocolitis.

RESULTS

We found the highest rates of severe adverse perinatal outcomes among the smallest newborns (< 3 percentile) (6.2% for the Visser reference curve, 8.6% for the Hoftiezer chart and 12.0% for the INTERGROWTH chart). Discriminative abilities of the three birth weight charts across the entire range of birth weight centiles were poor with areas under the curve ranging from 0.57 to 0.61. Sensitivity rates of the various cut-offs were also low.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical utility of all three charts in identifying high risk of severe adverse perinatal outcomes is poor. There is no single cut-off that discriminates clearly between newborns at low or high risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register NTR4367 . Registration date March 20, 2014.

摘要

目的

在两个荷兰和一个国际出生体重图表中,确定新生儿在各个出生体重百分位的严重不良围产结局风险。

背景

生长受限的新生儿在宫内未达到其内在生长潜能,有围产期发病率和死亡率的风险。出生后,胎儿生长受限的确诊没有金标准。估计胎儿体重和出生体重低于第 10 百分位通常被用作生长受限的代理。出生体重图表的选择会影响定义异常出生体重的具体截止值,从而触发临床管理。理想情况下,该截止值应适当区分低风险和高风险的新生儿,以正确指导临床管理。

方法

这是 IUGR 风险选择(IRIS)研究的二次分析。纳入了荷兰低风险孕妇的新生儿(n=12953),并接受了初级产前保健。我们通过将出生体重百分位分组来检查三种出生体重图表(Visser、Hoftiezer 和 INTERGROWTH)的严重不良围产结局分布,并比较严重不良围产结局的预测性能。严重不良围产结局定义为以下一种或多种的复合结果:围产期死亡、5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<4、意识障碍、窒息、癫痫发作、辅助通气、败血症、脑膜炎、支气管肺发育不良、颅内出血、脑室周围白质软化或坏死性小肠结肠炎。

结果

我们发现,在最小的新生儿中(<3 百分位),严重不良围产结局的发生率最高(Visser 参考曲线为 6.2%,Hoftiezer 图表为 8.6%,INTERGROWTH 图表为 12.0%)。三种出生体重图表在整个出生体重百分位范围内的区分能力都很差,曲线下面积范围为 0.57 至 0.61。各种截止值的敏感性也较低。

结论

在识别严重不良围产结局的高风险方面,三种图表的临床实用性都较差。没有单一的截止值可以明确区分低风险和高风险的新生儿。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册 NTR4367。注册日期 2014 年 3 月 20 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbad/9055757/4d08dde7e36b/12884_2022_4680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbad/9055757/4d08dde7e36b/12884_2022_4680_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbad/9055757/4d08dde7e36b/12884_2022_4680_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations of severe adverse perinatal outcomes among continuous birth weight percentiles on different birth weight charts: a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial.不同出生体重图表中连续体重百分位数与严重围生期不良结局的关联:一项集群随机试验的二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):375. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04680-5.
2
Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.使用人群、定制和生长图表确定与不良围产结局相关的出生体重百分位数阈值:一项基于人群的瑞典队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 20;16(9):e1002902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002902. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.六种出生体重和估计胎儿体重标准预测不良围产结局的性能:一项全国性的 10 年基于人群的研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):264-277. doi: 10.1002/uog.22151.
4
Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.常规孕晚期超声检查降低低危妊娠不良围产结局的效果(IRIS 研究):全国性、实用主义、多中心、阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 15;367:l5517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5517.
5
Small for gestational age at preterm birth identifies adverse neonatal outcomes more reliably than antenatal suspicion of fetal growth restriction.早产儿小于胎龄儿比产前怀疑胎儿生长受限更能可靠地识别不良新生儿结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(2):2279017. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2279017. Epub 2023 Nov 19.
6
Prognostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of brain in fetal growth restriction: results of prospective multicenter study.胎儿生长受限的脑弥散加权磁共振成像的预后价值:前瞻性多中心研究结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;56(6):893-900. doi: 10.1002/uog.21926.
7
Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.识别适用于早产儿人群的最佳生长图表:一项澳大利亚全州回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 4;16(10):e1002923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002923. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).孕晚期常规超声筛查胎儿生长受限的有效性和成本效益:荷兰一项全国性阶梯楔形整群随机试验的研究方案(IRIS研究)
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1104-8.
9
INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.在足月时不良围产期结局的检测中,将INTERGROWTH-21st与GROW定制百分位数进行比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Mar;33(6):961-966. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1511696. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Customized birth-weight centiles and placenta-related fetal growth restriction.定制的出生体重百分位数与胎盘相关的胎儿生长受限。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Mar;57(3):409-416. doi: 10.1002/uog.23516.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies after metabolic bariatric surgery: a retrospective population-based study.代谢性减重手术后妊娠的母婴结局:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Mar 22;51:101263. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101263. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
On the study of fetal growth restriction: time to abandon SGA.关于胎儿生长受限的研究:是时候摒弃小于胎龄儿了。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;39(3):233-239. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01098-5. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
3
Association between perinatal mortality and morbidity and customised and non-customised birthweight centiles in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Wales, and England: comparative, population based, record linkage study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.评估用于检测小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿不良结局的估计胎儿体重图表性能的比较:一项基于法国人群的研究。
BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):938-948. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17021. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
2
International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: A population-based study in 15 European countries.用于识别小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿的国际与国家生长曲线图表:一项基于15个欧洲国家人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jul 15;8:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100167. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
丹麦、芬兰、挪威、威尔士和英格兰围产期死亡率及发病率与定制和非定制出生体重百分位数之间的关联:基于人群的比较性记录链接研究
BMJ Med. 2023 Aug 30;2(1):e000521. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000521. eCollection 2023.
4
Perinatal mortality rate and adverse perinatal outcomes presumably attributable to placental dysfunction in (near) term gestation: A nationwide 5-year cohort study.足月(临近足月)妊娠胎盘功能障碍导致的围产儿死亡率和不良围产儿结局:一项全国性的 5 年队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0285096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285096. eCollection 2023.
5
Inferring fetal growth restriction as rare, severe, and stable over time.推断胎儿生长受限是罕见的、严重的、且随时间稳定的。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 May;38(5):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00985-7. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
Fetal growth velocity standards from the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21 Project.
INTERGROWTH-21 项目胎儿生长纵向研究的胎儿生长速度标准。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Feb;224(2):208.e1-208.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.054. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
4
A maternal serum metabolite ratio predicts fetal growth restriction at term.母体血清代谢物比值可预测足月胎儿生长受限。
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):348-353. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0804-9. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
5
Effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasonography to reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in low risk pregnancy (the IRIS study): nationwide, pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.常规孕晚期超声检查降低低危妊娠不良围产结局的效果(IRIS 研究):全国性、实用主义、多中心、阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 15;367:l5517. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5517.
6
Comparative analysis of 2-year outcomes in GRIT and TRUFFLE trials.GRIT 和 TRUFFLE 试验 2 年结果的对比分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;55(1):68-74. doi: 10.1002/uog.20354.
7
Standard vs population reference curves in obstetrics: which one should we use?产科中的标准曲线与人群参考曲线:我们应该使用哪一种?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):293-296. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.060.
8
Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Postnatal Monitoring and Outcomes.宫内生长受限:出生后监测与结局
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;66(2):403-423. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.12.009.
9
Neurodevelopmental outcomes at five years after early-onset fetal growth restriction: Analyses in a Dutch subgroup participating in a European management trial.早发型胎儿生长受限后五年的神经发育结局:参与一项欧洲管理试验的荷兰亚组分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
10
Are selection criteria for healthy pregnancies responsible for the gap between fetal growth in the French national Elfe birth cohort and the Intergrowth-21st fetal growth standards?法国全国性的埃尔夫(Elfe)出生队列中胎儿生长情况与国际胎儿生长发育标准(Intergrowth-21st)之间的差距是否是由健康妊娠的选择标准导致的?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):47-56. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12526. Epub 2018 Nov 28.