Suppr超能文献

通过磁选和静电分离从印刷电路板制备的热解碳的对比研究。

Comparative study of pyrolytic carbons prepared from printed circuit boards by magnetic and electrostatic separation.

作者信息

Kan Yujiao, Zheng Fangyuan, Zhang Ruxin

机构信息

College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology Qingdao 266590 China

出版信息

RSC Adv. 2021 Oct 13;11(53):33490-33499. doi: 10.1039/d1ra05287j. eCollection 2021 Oct 8.

Abstract

Physical technology is the main method to separate metal and non-metallic fractions from printed circuit boards (PCBs). The non-metallic fractions from magnetic and electrostatic separation have different ingredients, which enables them to be prepared into pyrolytic carbon with different properties. To discover the influence of separation technologies for PCBs on the preparation, characterization and application of pyrolytic carbon, two kinds of nonmetal fraction from magnetic and electrostatic separation were chosen as the precursors of pyrolytic carbon. The thermogravimetric analysis of non-magnetic fraction and non-conductive fraction at different heating rates was discussed in the paper. The optimal heating rate of 10 °C min was applied in preparing pyrolytic carbons. Pyrolytic carbons prepared from the non-magnetic fraction and non-conductive fraction had visible differences in their morphological and pore structures. Pyrolytic carbons of the non-magnetic fraction exhibited higher BET surface area (313 m g) and higher adsorption capacities for ciprofloxacin (142.82 mg g) than those of pyrolytic carbon of the non-conductive fraction ( : 235 m g, : 78.17 mg g). Equilibrium data fit better to the Freundlich model than the Langmuir model. According to the calculated thermodynamic parameters, CIP adsorption processes by the two pyrolytic carbons were spontaneous and endothermic. Although the metal recovery from PCBs through electrostatic separation is higher, pyrolytic carbon prepared from the non-magnetic fraction shows better pore characteristics and adsorption properties. This paper might be the first report of the effect of separation technology for PCBs on the preparation of pyrolytic carbons. This paper contributed to the reutilization of non-metallic fractions of PCBs and the development of a cyclic economy.

摘要

物理技术是从印刷电路板(PCBs)中分离金属和非金属组分的主要方法。磁选和静电分选得到的非金属组分具有不同的成分,这使得它们能够被制备成具有不同性能的热解碳。为了探究印刷电路板的分离技术对热解碳制备、表征及应用的影响,选取了磁选和静电分选得到的两种非金属组分作为热解碳的前驱体。本文讨论了不同加热速率下非磁性组分和非导电组分的热重分析。在热解碳制备过程中采用了10℃/min的最佳加热速率。由非磁性组分和非导电组分制备的热解碳在形态和孔隙结构上存在明显差异。非磁性组分的热解碳比非导电组分的热解碳表现出更高的BET比表面积(313 m²/g)和对环丙沙星更高的吸附容量(142.82 mg/g)(非导电组分热解碳:235 m²/g,78.17 mg/g)。平衡数据与Freundlich模型的拟合度优于Langmuir模型。根据计算得到的热力学参数,两种热解碳对环丙沙星的吸附过程都是自发的且吸热的。虽然通过静电分选从印刷电路板中回收的金属含量更高,但由非磁性组分制备的热解碳具有更好的孔隙特性和吸附性能。本文可能是关于印刷电路板分离技术对热解碳制备影响的首次报道。本文有助于印刷电路板非金属组分的再利用和循环经济的发展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验