Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Genève 14, Switzerland.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7775-7780. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09255-1. Epub 2022 May 4.
Observational studies have shown that fluorescence angiography (FA) decreases the incidence of anastomotic leak (AL) in colorectal surgery, but high-quality pooled evidence was lacking. Therefore, we aimed at confirming this preliminary finding using a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the field.
MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL were searched for RCTs assessing the effect of intra-operative FA versus standard assessment of bowel perfusion on the incidence of AL of colorectal anastomosis. The systematic review complied with the PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR2 recommendations and was registered in PROSPERO. Pooled relative risk (RR) and pooled risk difference (RD) were obtained using models with random effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and quantified using the I value. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool.
One hundred and eleven articles were screened, 108 were excluded and three were kept for inclusion. The three included RCTs compared assessment of the perfusion of the bowel during creation of a colorectal anastomosis using FA versus standard practice. In meta-analysis, FA was significantly protective against AL (3 RCTs, 964 patients, RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.99, I: 0%, p = 0.04). The RD of AL was non-significantly decreased by 4 percentage points (95%CI: - 0.08 to 0, I: 8%, p = 0.06) when using FA. Certainty of evidence was considered as moderate.
The effect of FA on prevention of AL in colorectal surgery exists but is potentially of small magnitude. Considering the potential magnitude of effect of FA, we advise that future RCTs have an adequate sample size, include a cost-benefit analysis of the technique and better define the subpopulation who could benefit from FA.
观察性研究表明,荧光血管造影(FA)可降低结直肠手术吻合口漏(AL)的发生率,但缺乏高质量的汇总证据。因此,我们旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析该领域的随机对照试验(RCT)来证实这一初步发现。
在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 中检索评估术中 FA 与肠灌注标准评估对比对结直肠吻合口 AL 发生率影响的 RCT。系统评价符合 PRISMA 2020 和 AMSTAR2 建议,并在 PROSPERO 中注册。使用具有随机效应的模型获得汇总相对风险(RR)和汇总风险差异(RD)。使用 Q 检验评估异质性,并使用 I 值量化。使用 GRADE Pro 工具评估证据的确定性。
筛选出 111 篇文章,其中 108 篇被排除,3 篇被保留纳入。这 3 项纳入的 RCT 比较了在创建结直肠吻合时使用 FA 与标准实践评估肠灌注的情况。荟萃分析显示,FA 显著降低 AL 的风险(3 项 RCT,964 例患者,RR:0.67,95%CI:0.46 至 0.99,I:0%,p=0.04)。使用 FA 时,AL 的 RD 非显著降低 4 个百分点(95%CI:-0.08 至 0,I:8%,p=0.06)。证据的确定性被认为是中度的。
FA 对预防结直肠手术 AL 有效,但潜在效果较小。考虑到 FA 的潜在效果大小,我们建议未来的 RCT 具有足够的样本量,包括该技术的成本效益分析,并更好地定义可能受益于 FA 的亚人群。