Suppr超能文献

三种口腔重建方法的比较。

A comparison of three methods of oral reconstruction.

作者信息

McConnel F M, Teichgraeber J F, Adler R K

出版信息

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 May;113(5):496-500. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1987.01860050042011.

Abstract

A protocol is presented that was designed to provide comparative data on the two primary oral cavity functions affected by surgery: speech and swallowing. Three types of reconstruction (skin grafts, hemitongue flaps, and myocutaneous flaps) and results of a series of tests given to 15 surgical patients with T2 and T3 tongue and/or floor of mouth lesions were evaluated. The patients who had split-thickness skin grafts had the best oral function results. The study suggests that tongue mobility is the most significant variable in determining post-operative speech results.

摘要

本文提出了一种方案,旨在提供受手术影响的两种主要口腔功能(言语和吞咽)的比较数据。评估了三种重建类型(皮肤移植、半舌瓣和肌皮瓣)以及对15名患有T2和T3期舌部和/或口腔底部病变的手术患者进行的一系列测试结果。接受中厚皮片移植的患者口腔功能结果最佳。该研究表明,舌头的活动度是决定术后言语结果的最重要变量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验