• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整体平均在深度和平面信息的工作记忆中扮演着不同的角色。

The role of ensemble average differs in working memory for depth and planar information.

机构信息

Sun Yat-Sen University, Department of Psychology, Guangzhou, China.

Shaoxing University, Center for Brain, Mind, and Education, Shaoxing, China.

出版信息

J Vis. 2022 May 3;22(6):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.6.4.

DOI:10.1167/jov.22.6.4
PMID:35522260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9078066/
Abstract

The representation of individual planar locations and features stored in working memory can be affected by the average representation. However, less is known about how the average representation affects the short-term storage of depth information. To evaluate the possible different roles of the ensemble average in working memory for planar and depth information, we used mathematical models to fit the data collected from one study on working memory for depth and 12 studies on working memory for planar information. The pattern of recalled depth was well captured by models assuming that there was a probability of reporting the average depth instead of the individual depth, compressing the recalled front-back distance of the stimulus ensemble compared to the perceived distance. However, when modeling the recalled planar information, we found that participants tended to report individual nontarget features when the target was not memorized, and the assumption of reporting average information improves the data fitting only in very few studies. These results provide evidence for our hypothesis that average depth information can be used as a substitution for individual depth information stored in working memory, but for planar visual features, the substitution of target with the average works under a constraint that the average of to-be-remembered features is readily accessible.

摘要

个体平面位置和特征的表示形式存储在工作记忆中,可能会受到平均表示形式的影响。然而,对于平均表示形式如何影响深度信息的短期存储,人们知之甚少。为了评估在工作记忆中,平均表示形式对平面和深度信息的短期存储可能具有的不同作用,我们使用数学模型拟合了一项关于深度工作记忆和 12 项关于平面信息工作记忆的研究中收集的数据。假设存在报告平均深度而不是个体深度的概率,可以对所记忆的深度的召回模式进行很好的拟合,从而压缩了与感知距离相比刺激整体的前后距离。然而,当对召回的平面信息进行建模时,我们发现当目标未被记住时,参与者倾向于报告个体非目标特征,而仅在极少数研究中,报告平均信息的假设可以改善数据拟合。这些结果为我们的假设提供了证据,即平均深度信息可用作存储在工作记忆中的个体深度信息的替代物,但对于平面视觉特征,用平均信息替代目标的前提是要记住的特征的平均值很容易获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/cfce8bf7b53e/jovi-22-6-4-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/8dbaf92c1795/jovi-22-6-4-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/97cd68c19081/jovi-22-6-4-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/6f558d7a38cf/jovi-22-6-4-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/14831aa11a9d/jovi-22-6-4-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/cfce8bf7b53e/jovi-22-6-4-f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/8dbaf92c1795/jovi-22-6-4-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/97cd68c19081/jovi-22-6-4-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/6f558d7a38cf/jovi-22-6-4-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/14831aa11a9d/jovi-22-6-4-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f913/9078066/cfce8bf7b53e/jovi-22-6-4-f005.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of ensemble average differs in working memory for depth and planar information.整体平均在深度和平面信息的工作记忆中扮演着不同的角色。
J Vis. 2022 May 3;22(6):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.6.4.
2
The role of visual working memory in capacity-limited cross-modal ensemble coding.视觉工作记忆在容量有限的跨模态整体编码中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2024 Jan 10;192:108745. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108745. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
3
Strategy-dependent effects of working-memory limitations on human perceptual decision-making.工作记忆限制对人类知觉决策的策略依赖性影响。
Elife. 2022 Mar 15;11:e73610. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73610.
4
Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall.视觉工作记忆中的高效编码解释了回忆中刺激特异性的变化。
J Neurosci. 2018 Aug 8;38(32):7132-7142. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1018-18.2018. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
5
Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.延迟期内与任务无关的干扰物会选择性地干扰对空间位置的视觉短期记忆。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1384-1392. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1320-y.
6
Individual representations in visual working memory inherit ensemble properties.视觉工作记忆中的个体表征继承了整体属性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 May;46(5):458-473. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000727. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Object-based visual working memory: an object benefit for equidistant memory items presented within simple contours.基于对象的视觉工作记忆:在简单轮廓内呈现等距记忆项目的对象优势。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1569-1589. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01757-w. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
8
Fine-grained, local maps and coarse, global representations support human spatial working memory.精细的局部地图和粗略的全局表征支持人类的空间工作记忆。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 26;9(9):e107969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107969. eCollection 2014.
9
Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.关系很重要:相对深度顺序被存储在工作记忆中用于深度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):341-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01705-7.
10
A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症中视觉工作记忆误差来源的机理见解。
Elife. 2023 Nov 8;12:RP87442. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87442.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual short-term memory for crossed and uncrossed binocular disparities.双眼交叉和非交叉视差的视觉短期记忆。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0312202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312202. eCollection 2024.
2
Evidence for the Beneficial Effect of Reward on Working Memory: A Meta-Analytic Study.奖励对工作记忆有益影响的证据:一项元分析研究。
J Intell. 2024 Sep 11;12(9):88. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12090088.
3
Serial dependence: A matter of memory load.序列依赖性:记忆负荷问题。

本文引用的文献

1
Ensemble Statistics Can Be Available before Individual Item Properties: Electroencephalography Evidence Using the Oddball Paradigm.在个体项目属性之前就可以获得整体统计信息:使用Oddball范式的脑电图证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 May 1;33(6):1056-1068. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01704.
2
Increasing perceptual separateness affects working memory for depth - re-allocation of attention from boundaries to the fixated center.增加感知分离会影响深度工作记忆——将注意力从边界重新分配到注视中心。
J Vis. 2021 Jul 6;21(7):8. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.7.8.
3
Limited memory for ensemble statistics in visual change detection.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 2;10(13):e33977. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33977. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
视觉变化检测中集合统计的有限记忆。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104763. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104763. Epub 2021 May 29.
4
Do group ensemble statistics bias visual working memory for individual items? A registered replication of Brady and Alvarez (2011).群组集合统计是否会影响个体项目的视觉工作记忆?对 Brady 和 Alvarez(2011)的注册重复研究。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):1329-1336. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02209-6. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
5
Stochastic sampling provides a unifying account of visual working memory limits.随机采样为视觉工作记忆限制提供了一个统一的解释。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 25;117(34):20959-20968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004306117. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Overestimation and contraction biases of depth information stored in working memory depend on spatial configuration.工作记忆中存储的深度信息存在高估和收缩偏差,这种偏差取决于空间配置。
Br J Psychol. 2021 Feb;112(1):230-246. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12456. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
7
Factors limiting sensitivity to binocular disparity in human vision: Evidence from a noise-masking approach.限制人类视觉中双眼视差敏感度的因素:来自噪声掩蔽方法的证据。
J Vis. 2020 Mar 17;20(3):9. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.3.9.
8
Individual representations in visual working memory inherit ensemble properties.视觉工作记忆中的个体表征继承了整体属性。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 May;46(5):458-473. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000727. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Relation matters: relative depth order is stored in working memory for depth.关系很重要:相对深度顺序被存储在工作记忆中用于深度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):341-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01705-7.
10
Distinguishing target biases and strategic guesses in visual working memory.区分视觉工作记忆中的目标偏差和策略性猜测。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01913-2.