Medical Sciences Division, Oxford Institute for Clinical Psychology Training and Research, 6396University of Oxford, UK.
Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, UK.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):255-269. doi: 10.1177/13591045221098896. Epub 2022 May 6.
Children and adolescents in the UK spend increasingly more time in the digital world, raising societal fears about digital risks in this age group. Professionals are not always aware of the ever-developing research or guidance available around digital safety. This gap underscores the need to understand current experiences and determinants of digital risk assessment, including clinicians' views on barriers and facilitators. A mixed-method design was used. Fifty-three clinicians working in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in South England took part in a survey; of these 12 took part in semi-structured interviews. A psychological model of behavioural change (COM-B: capabilities, opportunities, motivation and behaviour) guided the analyses. Survey data revealed that clinicians showed awareness and concerns for several digital risk issues but there appeared to be gaps in their knowledge and practice. Interview data revealed different factors influencing staff enquiry about digital risks in CAMHS. These included aspects of capabilities (knowledge and skills), opportunities (resources, organisational context and empowerment of youth), and motivations (habit change, emotional experiences, and professional identity/role). Targeting both staff-level and organisation-level barriers to digital risk assessments in CAMHS is crucial. This study informs service improvement to ensure that children and young people safely navigate the digital world.
英国的儿童和青少年在数字世界中花费的时间越来越多,这引发了社会对这一年龄群体数字风险的担忧。专业人士并不总是了解数字安全方面不断发展的研究或可用的指导。这一差距凸显了需要了解数字风险评估的当前经验和决定因素,包括临床医生对障碍和促进因素的看法。本研究采用混合方法设计。英国南部儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构(CAMHS)的 53 名临床医生参与了一项调查;其中 12 人参与了半结构化访谈。行为改变的心理模型(COM-B:能力、机会、动机和行为)指导了分析。调查数据显示,临床医生对几个数字风险问题表现出了意识和关注,但他们的知识和实践似乎存在差距。访谈数据揭示了影响 CAMHS 中工作人员询问数字风险的不同因素。这些因素包括能力方面(知识和技能)、机会(资源、组织背景和青年赋权)以及动机(习惯改变、情感体验和专业身份/角色)。针对 CAMHS 中数字风险评估的人员层面和组织层面的障碍进行靶向干预至关重要。本研究为服务改进提供了信息,以确保儿童和青少年能够安全地在数字世界中航行。