Zelenski Nicole A, Hsu Chung-Chen, Zhao Chunfeng, Amadio Peter C, An Kai-Nan, Moran Steven L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Microsurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Sep;48(9):952.e1-952.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 May 4.
The flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon transfer can be used to restore opposition of the thumb. Several pulley designs have been proposed for this transfer. Gliding resistance is considered to be an important factor influencing the efficiency of the pulley design. Our purpose was to compare the gliding resistance among 4 commonly used pulleys for the FDS oppositional transfer.
Ten fresh-frozen cadaver specimens were studied. The ring FDS was used as the donor tendon. An oppositional transfer was created using 4 pulley configurations: FDS passed around the flexor carpi ulnaris (a-FCU), FDS passed through a 2.5-cm circumference distally based FCU loop (2.5-FCU), FDS passed through a 3.5-cm circumference distally based FCU loop (3.5-FCU), and FDS passed through a longitudinal split in the FCU tendon (s-FCU). The gliding resistance was measured with the thumb in radial abduction and maximum opposition.
In abduction, the average FDS gliding resistance of a-FCU, 2.5-FCU, 3.5-FCU, and s-FCU was 0.66 N (SD, 0.14 N), 0.70 N (SD, 0.14 N), 0.68 N (SD, 0.16 N), and 0.79 N (SD, 0.15 N), respectively. The peak gliding resistance of a-FCU, 2.5-FCU, 3.5-FCU, and s-FCU was 0.75 N (SD, 0.16 N), 0.74 N (SD, 0.15 N), 0.74 N (SD, 0.15 N), and 0.86 N (SD, 0.15 N), respectively.
The average gliding resistance of the s-FCU was found to be significantly higher than that of the a-FCU and 3.5-FCU pulleys. In opposition, there were no differences in average or peak gliding resistance among the different pulley designs.
In this in vitro cadaveric study, the FDS split pulley produced higher gliding resistance. Consideration of the pulley configuration may improve the overall thumb function by decreasing forces needed to overcome gliding resistance.
指浅屈肌(FDS)肌腱转移可用于恢复拇指对掌功能。针对这种转移已经提出了几种滑车设计。滑动阻力被认为是影响滑车设计效率的一个重要因素。我们的目的是比较4种常用于FDS对掌转移的滑车的滑动阻力。
研究了10个新鲜冷冻尸体标本。使用环指FDS作为供体肌腱。采用4种滑车构型进行对掌转移:FDS绕过尺侧腕屈肌(a-FCU),FDS穿过一个基于尺侧腕屈肌的2.5厘米周长的远侧环(2.5-FCU),FDS穿过一个基于尺侧腕屈肌的3.5厘米周长的远侧环(3.5-FCU),以及FDS穿过尺侧腕屈肌腱的纵向劈开处(s-FCU)。在拇指桡侧外展和最大对掌时测量滑动阻力。
在外展时,a-FCU、2.5-FCU、3.5-FCU和s-FCU的FDS平均滑动阻力分别为0.66 N(标准差,0.14 N)、0.70 N(标准差,0.14 N)、0.68 N(标准差,0.16 N)和0.79 N(标准差,0.15 N)。a-FCU、2.5-FCU、3.5-FCU和s-FCU的峰值滑动阻力分别为0.75 N(标准差,0.16 N)、0.74 N(标准差,0.15 N)、0.74 N(标准差,0.15 N)和0.86 N(标准差,0.15 N)。
发现s-FCU的平均滑动阻力显著高于a-FCU和3.5-FCU滑车。在对掌时,不同滑车设计之间的平均或峰值滑动阻力没有差异。
在这项体外尸体研究中,FDS劈开滑车产生了更高的滑动阻力。考虑滑车构型可能通过减少克服滑动阻力所需的力来改善拇指的整体功能。