Jason Leonard A, Bobak Ted, Islam Mohammed, Guerrero Mayra, Light John M, Stoolmiller Mike
DePaul University.
Oregon Research Institute.
Alcohol Treat Q. 2022;40(2):191-204. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2021.1987179. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
Some recovery homes have facilitating relationships and organizational characteristics, and there are also social capital differences among residents of these recovery homes. It is important to better understand the impact of protective and risk individual and house factors on recovery issues among residents of these community-based settings. Individuals from 42 recovery homes were followed for up to six data collection periods over two years. House level latent class analyses tapped relationship and organizational domains and individual level latent class analyses were from derived from elements of recovery capital. Houses that manifested protective factors provided most residents positive outcomes, except those with elevated self-esteem. Houses that were less facilitating had more negative exits, except for those residents who were the highest functioning. Both individual and house characteristics are of importance in helping to understand risk factors associated with eviction outcomes for residents in recovery homes.
一些康复之家具有促进性的关系和组织特征，并且这些康复之家的居民之间也存在社会资本差异。更好地理解个体和家庭层面的保护因素与风险因素对这些社区环境中居民康复问题的影响非常重要。在两年时间里，对来自42个康复之家的个体进行了长达六个数据收集期的跟踪。家庭层面的潜在类别分析涉及关系和组织领域，个体层面的潜在类别分析则源自康复资本要素。表现出保护因素的家庭为大多数居民带来了积极结果，但自尊水平较高的居民除外。促进性较差的家庭有更多负面结局，但功能最高的居民除外。个体和家庭特征对于帮助理解与康复之家居民驱逐结果相关的风险因素都很重要。
