J Drugs Dermatol. 2022 May 1;21(5):544. doi: 10.36849/JDD.542.
The intent of this brief communication is to describe a unique incomplete staining frozen section pathology artifact encountered during Mohs Micrographic Surgery. At the authors’ institution, an amorphous, eosinophilic artifact that obscured cellular architecture was observed multiple times during histological interpretation. It was determined that incomplete tissue staining was likely caused by weak staining, possibly related to an interaction between hematoxylin dye solution and acetone. We adjusted our SLS stain line protocol by adding a 15 second water rinse between the acetone and hematoxylin pots and then compared the old fixation protocol with our new fixation protocol. This artifact, which was regularly found intraoperatively at five separate MMS laboratories has sustainably resolved. Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is a dermatologic procedure that includes tumor extirpation, tissue grossing, slide preparation, and microscopic histologic interpretation. Tissue grossing and slide preparation are vital components of the MMS procedure. There are many steps throughout tissue processing that can result in frozen section pathology artifacts. Frequently encountered frozen section pathology artifacts include vacuolation of cytoplasm or “freeze artifact,” overstaining and understaining with hematoxylin and eosin, incomplete dehydration, and splaying of collagen in the dermis.1-3 We describe a unique incomplete staining frozen section pathology artifact. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):542-544. doi:10.36849/JDD.6722.
本简讯旨在描述在Mohs 显微外科手术中遇到的一种独特的不完全染色冷冻切片病理伪影。在作者所在机构,在多次进行组织学解读时,观察到一种模糊的、嗜酸性的物质,其掩盖了细胞结构。据推测,组织不完全染色可能是由于染色较弱所致,这可能与苏木精染料溶液和丙酮之间的相互作用有关。我们通过在丙酮和苏木精罐之间增加 15 秒的水冲洗来调整我们的 SLS 染色线方案,然后将旧的固定方案与新的固定方案进行比较。这种伪影在五个不同的 MMS 实验室中经常在手术中发现,已经得到了持续解决。Mohs 显微外科手术(MMS)是一种皮肤科手术,包括肿瘤切除、组织粗切、切片制备和显微镜下的组织学解读。组织粗切和切片制备是 MMS 手术的重要组成部分。在整个组织处理过程中有许多步骤可能会导致冷冻切片病理伪影。常见的冷冻切片病理伪影包括细胞质空泡化或“冷冻伪影”、苏木精和伊红过度染色和欠染色、不完全脱水以及真皮中胶原的张开。我们描述了一种独特的不完全染色冷冻切片病理伪影。J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(5):542-544. doi:10.36849/JDD.6722.