Suppr超能文献

索磷布韦/维帕他韦和格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦对血清肌酐的影响。

Effect of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir and Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir on Serum Creatinine.

作者信息

Amjad Waseem, Zhang Talan, Maheshwari Anurag, Thuluvath Paul J

机构信息

Institute of Digestive Heath and Liver Diseases, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Mar-Apr;12(2):329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: There are reports of worsening renal functions with sofosbuvir, but there are no comparative data of different direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on serum creatinine. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we examined the treatment effect of two commonly used regimens, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), on serum creatinine.

METHODS

We included all patients treated with SOF/LDV (n = 825) and GLE/PIB (n = 116) between December 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. An increase of serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL was considered clinically significant. The change of creatinine values from pretreatment to posttreatment between two treatment groups was tested in unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear model, and risk factors associated with creatinine change were assessed. In addition, GLE/PIB-treated patients were matched 1:2 to SOF/LDV-treated patients using propensity scores, and then serum creatinine changes were compared.

RESULTS

The mean baseline creatinine was higher in the GLE/PIB group vs. SOF/LDV group (1.39 ± 1.86 vs. 0.91 ± 0.24,  = 0.007). When compared to baseline, serum creatinine at posttreatment week 4 was significantly higher in SOF/LDV group (0.97 ± 0.4 vs.0.91 ± 0.24,  < 0.001), but there was no significant change in the GLE/PIB group (1.41 ± 1.73 vs. 1.39 ± 1.86,  = 0.52). Overall, there was no significant change in serum creatinine between posttreatment week 4 and week 24 ( = 0.6). Clinically significant increase in serum creatinine was seen in 6% (46/825) of SOF/LDV and 7% (8/116) of GLE/PIB ( = 0.6). The unadjusted and adjusted models indicated that the changes in creatinine from baseline to posttreatment week 4 and week 24 were not associated with the type of DAA combination.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection with both SOF/LDV and GLE/PIB regimens may result in an increase of creatinine, and 6-7% will have an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL. The increase in creatinine, however, is unrelated to the type of DAA combination.

摘要

背景与目的

有报告称索磷布韦可导致肾功能恶化,但尚无不同直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)对血清肌酐影响的比较数据。在这项回顾性队列分析中,我们研究了两种常用方案,即索磷布韦/来迪帕司韦(SOF/LDV)和格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦(GLE/PIB)对血清肌酐的治疗效果。

方法

我们纳入了2014年12月1日至2018年12月31日期间接受SOF/LDV(n = 825)和GLE/PIB(n = 116)治疗的所有患者。血清肌酐升高≥0.3mg/dL被认为具有临床意义。在未调整和调整后的广义线性模型中测试两个治疗组从治疗前到治疗后肌酐值的变化,并评估与肌酐变化相关的危险因素。此外,使用倾向评分将接受GLE/PIB治疗的患者与接受SOF/LDV治疗的患者按1:2进行匹配,然后比较血清肌酐变化。

结果

GLE/PIB组的平均基线肌酐高于SOF/LDV组(1.39±1.86 vs. 0.91±0.24,P = 0.007)。与基线相比,SOF/LDV组治疗后第4周的血清肌酐显著升高(0.97±0.4 vs. 0.91±0.24,P < 0.001),但GLE/PIB组无显著变化(1.41±1.73 vs. 1.39±1.86,P = 0.52)。总体而言,治疗后第4周和第24周血清肌酐无显著变化(P = 0.6)。SOF/LDV组6%(46/825)和GLE/PIB组7%(8/116)出现血清肌酐临床显著升高(P = 0.6)。未调整和调整后的模型表明,从基线到治疗后第4周和第24周肌酐的变化与DAA组合类型无关。

结论

使用SOF/LDV和GLE/PIB方案治疗慢性丙型肝炎感染可能导致肌酐升高,6%-7%的患者血清肌酐升高≥0.3mg/dL。然而,肌酐升高与DAA组合类型无关。

相似文献

1
Effect of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir and Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir on Serum Creatinine.
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2022 Mar-Apr;12(2):329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
7
Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C: Predictors of Early Discontinuation in the Real World.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jun;25(6):697-704. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.6.697.
8
Real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for genotype 6 chronic hepatitis C.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Nov;121(11):2265-2272. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 May 14.
9
Pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents for mixed genotype hepatitis C infection: A real-world effectiveness analysis.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;36(10):2911-2916. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15546. Epub 2021 May 19.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of eGFR in chronic HCV patients receiving sofosbuvir-based or sofosbuvir-free direct-acting antivirals.
J Hepatol. 2020 May;72(5):839-846. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.014. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
2
Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV in mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020 Jan-Feb;40(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
3
Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir for 12 weeks in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis.
J Hepatol. 2019 Oct;71(4):660-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.05.028. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Treatment With Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir.
Hepatol Commun. 2018 Sep 24;2(10):1172-1178. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1243. eCollection 2018 Oct.
5
Efficacy and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C patients with moderate renal impairment.
Hepatol Int. 2018 Mar;12(2):133-142. doi: 10.1007/s12072-018-9859-9. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
6
Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Patients with HCV and Severe Renal Impairment.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1448-1455. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704053.
7
Acute Interstitial Nephritis Associated with Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir.
ACG Case Rep J. 2017 Jul 5;4:e84. doi: 10.14309/crj.2017.84. eCollection 2017.
8
The frequency of acute kidney injury in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;46(1):46-55. doi: 10.1111/apt.14117. Epub 2017 May 3.
9
Treating Hepatitis C in Patients with Renal Failure.
Dig Dis. 2017;35(4):339-346. doi: 10.1159/000456585. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Hepatitis C viral load, genotype, and increased risk of developing end-stage renal disease: REVEAL-HCV study.
Hepatology. 2017 Sep;66(3):784-793. doi: 10.1002/hep.29192. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验