• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对低收入成年人开展强化教育的果蔬处方计划的效果

Effects of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program With Expanded Education for Low-Income Adults.

作者信息

Slagel Nicholas, Newman Taylor, Sanville Laurel, Dallas Jackie, Cotto-Rivera Edda, Moore Jessie, Roberts Mph Alexis, Sun Lee Jung

机构信息

The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2022 May 10:10901981221091926. doi: 10.1177/10901981221091926.

DOI:10.1177/10901981221091926
PMID:35535592
Abstract

Fruit and Vegetable Prescription (FVRx) Programs combine produce prescriptions and nutrition education to reduce fruit and vegetable consumption barriers and promote health among low-income patient populations. This study examined whether a multi-level FVRx intervention model with intensive education improves dietary behaviors, food security, and health outcomes over single-level interventions alone. A 6-month nonrandomized, parallel, controlled trial was conducted with one intervention, FVRx ( = 31) and two comparison groups, Nutrition Education ( = 13) and Control ( = 16). The FVRx group received produce prescriptions (US$1/day/household member) redeemable at a farmer's market, two SNAP-Ed programs, one financial literacy program, and monthly health screenings. The Nutrition Education (NE) group participated in one SNAP-Ed program, and the Control group received safety-net clinic care only. Surveys assessed dietary intake, food security, food purchasing practices, and financial and food resource management. Pre-post clinical biomarkers (blood lipid and hemoglobin A1c) and monthly biometrics (anthropometrics and blood pressure) were measured. Descriptive analysis and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were conducted. Compared with comparison groups, FVRx participants significantly increased the frequency of consuming dark green vegetables, FVRx (0.36 ± 0.72); NE (0.14 ± 0.33); Control (-0.09 ± 0.19) cups/day ( < .05). FVRx participants significantly improved multiple healthful food purchasing practices, and the ability to afford more utilities (FVRx (33%); NE (0%); Control (10%); < .05). Limited changes were observed in food security and clinical biomarker outcomes between groups. Combining expanded nutrition and financial literacy education with produce prescriptions improves low-income adults' financial and food resources, preference, knowledge, purchase, and consumption of locally grown vegetables over single-level interventions.

摘要

果蔬处方(FVRx)项目将农产品处方与营养教育相结合,以减少果蔬消费障碍,并促进低收入患者群体的健康。本研究探讨了强化教育的多层次FVRx干预模式与单一层次干预相比,是否能改善饮食行为、食品安全和健康状况。开展了一项为期6个月的非随机、平行对照试验,其中一组为干预组FVRx(n = 31),两组为对照组,即营养教育组(n = 13)和常规护理组(n = 16)。FVRx组接受农产品处方(每户家庭成员每天1美元),可在农贸市场兑换,参加两项补充营养援助计划教育项目、一项金融知识普及项目,并接受每月一次的健康筛查。营养教育(NE)组参加一项补充营养援助计划教育项目,常规护理组仅接受安全网诊所护理。通过调查评估饮食摄入量、食品安全、食品购买行为以及财务和食品资源管理情况。测量临床生物标志物(血脂和糖化血红蛋白A1c)的前后变化以及每月生物特征指标(人体测量指标和血压)。进行描述性分析和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。与对照组相比,FVRx参与者显著增加了深绿色蔬菜的食用频率,FVRx组为(0.36±0.72)杯/天;NE组为(0.14±0.33)杯/天;常规护理组为(-0.09±0.19)杯/天(P <.05)。FVRx参与者显著改善了多种健康食品购买行为,以及购买更多生活必需品的能力(FVRx组为33%;NE组为0%;常规护理组为10%;P <.05)。各小组之间在食品安全和临床生物标志物结果方面观察到的变化有限。与单一层次干预相比,将扩展的营养和金融知识教育与农产品处方相结合,可改善低收入成年人的财务和食品资源、偏好、知识、购买和当地种植蔬菜的消费情况。

相似文献

1
Effects of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program With Expanded Education for Low-Income Adults.一项针对低收入成年人开展强化教育的果蔬处方计划的效果
Health Educ Behav. 2022 May 10:10901981221091926. doi: 10.1177/10901981221091926.
2
A Pilot Fruit and Vegetable Prescription (FVRx) Program Improves Local Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, Nutrition Knowledge, and Food Purchasing Practices.一项试点果蔬处方(FVRx)计划改善了当地果蔬消费、营养知识和食品购买习惯。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jan;24(1):62-69. doi: 10.1177/15248399211018169. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Produce Prescriptions and Nutrition Education Improve Experiences and Perceptions of Farm Direct Settings in Adults With Low Income.开具处方和营养教育可改善低收入成年人对农场直销模式的体验和认知。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Nov;54(11):1011-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.08.010.
4
Strategies and Challenges: Qualitative Lessons Learned From Georgia Produce Prescription Programs.策略与挑战:佐治亚州农产品处方项目的定性经验教训
Health Promot Pract. 2022 Jul;23(4):699-707. doi: 10.1177/15248399211028558. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
Impact of a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program on Health Outcomes and Behaviors in Young Navajo Children.果蔬处方计划对纳瓦霍族幼儿健康结果和行为的影响。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Jul 21;4(8):nzaa109. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa109. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
"Prevention Produce": Integrating Medical Student Mentorship into a Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program for At-Risk Patients.“预防成果”:将医学生指导融入针对高危患者的果蔬处方计划
Perm J. 2019;23. doi: 10.7812/TPP/18-238.
7
Patients' experiences with a community fruit and vegetable box program prescribed by their health provider.患者对其健康提供者开方的社区水果和蔬菜箱计划的体验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 11;23(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15685-w.
8
Feasibility and Response to the San Diego County, California, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Agency Sending Food and Nutrition Text Messages to All Participants: Quasi-Experimental Web-Based Survey Pilot Study.加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县补充营养援助计划(SNAP)机构向所有参与者发送食品和营养短信的可行性和反应:准实验性基于网络的调查试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 19;25:e41021. doi: 10.2196/41021.
9
Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: a randomized controlled trial.社区支持农业加营养教育可提高低收入照顾者的技能、自我效能和饮食行为,但对其子女没有影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01168-x.
10
SNAP-Ed (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-Education) Increases Long-Term Food Security among Indiana Households with Children in a Randomized Controlled Study.在一项随机对照研究中,SNAP-Ed(补充营养援助计划-教育)提高了印第安纳州有孩子家庭的长期粮食安全。
J Nutr. 2016 Nov;146(11):2375-2382. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.231373. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining Food Security, Fruit and Vegetable Intake, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Outcomes of Produce Prescription (PPR) Programs: A Systematic Review.考察粮食安全、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及农产品处方 (PPR) 计划对心血管疾病风险结果的影响:系统评价。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Nov;56(11):794-821. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.06.012. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Food is Medicine Initiative for Mitigating Food Insecurity in the United States.食物是药物倡议,以减轻美国的粮食不安全。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2024 Mar;57(2):96-107. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.23.505. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
3
Implementing a Food Prescription Program during COVID-19: Benefits and Barriers.
在新冠疫情期间实施食品处方计划:益处与障碍
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;12(2):182. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020182.
4
Community Activities in Primary Care: A Literature Review.社区活动在初级保健中的作用:文献综述。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319231223362. doi: 10.1177/21501319231223362.