Grupo Peruano de Investigación Epidemiológica, Unidad para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú.
Escuela Profesional de Medicina Humana, Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco, Cusco, Perú.
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0267625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267625. eCollection 2022.
To determine the factors associated with prevention practices against COVID-19 in the Peruvian population according to rural vs. urban locations.
Analytical cross-sectional study, secondary analysis based on a previously collected database. A sample of individuals over 18 years of age, residing in Peru and with no history of COVID-19was evaluated. Factors associated with prevention practices were evaluated using Poisson regressions with variance adjustment by region cluster and stratified by rurality.
Of 3231 participants included, 2741 (84.8%) were from urban areas and 490 (15.2%) from rural areas. The frequency of good prevention practices against COVID-19 was 27.8% in our total sample. In urban areas the frequency of good prevention practices was 28.8% and in rural areas it was 22.5%. Factors associated with prevention practices against COVID-19 in both urban and rural areas were male sex (urban: aPR 0.64, 95%CI 0.55-0.75; rural: aPR 0.66, 95%CI 0.54-0.80) and self-considering adequately carrying out prevention practices (urban: aPR 2.48, 95%CI 2.13-2.89; rural: aPR 2.70, 95%CI 2.27-3.19).
The frequency of good prevention practices against COVID-19 was less than 30% in both urban and rural areas. There are differences in the factors associated with good preventive practice against COVID-19. Only sex and considering that preventive measures were adequately carried out were associated with good prevention practices in both areas. In view of this, prevention measures should be promoted taking into account cultural principles and considering geographical location in the face of present and future outbreaks or pandemics.
根据农村与城市地区的位置,确定与秘鲁人群 COVID-19 预防措施相关的因素。
这是一项基于先前收集的数据库进行的分析性横断面研究。评估了年龄在 18 岁以上、居住在秘鲁且无 COVID-19 病史的个人样本。使用泊松回归调整地区聚类方差,并按农村/城市分层,评估与预防措施相关的因素。
在 3231 名参与者中,2741 名(84.8%)来自城市地区,490 名(15.2%)来自农村地区。我们的总样本中,COVID-19 良好预防措施的实施频率为 27.8%。城市地区良好预防措施的实施频率为 28.8%,农村地区为 22.5%。与城市和农村地区 COVID-19 预防措施相关的因素是男性(城市:aPR 0.64,95%CI 0.55-0.75;农村:aPR 0.66,95%CI 0.54-0.80)和自认为充分实施预防措施(城市:aPR 2.48,95%CI 2.13-2.89;农村:aPR 2.70,95%CI 2.27-3.19)。
城市和农村地区 COVID-19 良好预防措施的实施频率均低于 30%。与 COVID-19 良好预防措施相关的因素存在差异。只有性别和认为预防措施得到充分实施与两个地区的良好预防措施相关。鉴于此,在面对当前和未来的疫情或大流行时,应考虑文化原则并考虑地理位置,来推广预防措施。