• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy vs Resection for Patients With Multifocal Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝动脉灌注泵化疗与切除术治疗多灶性肝内胆管细胞癌的比较。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):590-596. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1298.
2
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不可切除的肝内胆管癌的肝动脉灌注化疗泵化疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;29(9):5528-5538. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11439-x. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3
Gemcitabine with Cisplatin Versus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy for Liver-Confined Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.吉西他滨联合顺铂与经肝动脉化疗泵灌注化疗治疗不可切除的局限性肝内胆管细胞癌的比较
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan;31(1):115-124. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14409-z. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
4
Assessment of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Floxuridine in Combination With Systemic Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin in Patients With Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.评估氟尿苷肝动脉灌注联合全身吉西他滨和奥沙利铂治疗不可切除的肝内胆管细胞癌患者的疗效:一项 2 期临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):60-67. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3718.
5
Robotic Biliary Stricturoplasty and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy After Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Injury.机器人胆道狭窄成形术和 Roux-en-Y 肝肠吻合术治疗肝动脉灌注泵损伤。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul;31(7):4449-4451. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15258-0. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
6
Robotic Versus Open Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Placement for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.机器人与开放式肝动脉灌注泵置入治疗不可切除的肝内胆管细胞癌。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Jun;31(6):4022-4029. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15127-w. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
7
Hepatic disease control in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma correlates with overall survival.肝内胆管癌患者的肝脏疾病控制与总生存期相关。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12272-12284. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5925. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
8
Unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systemic plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is associated with longer survival in comparison with systemic chemotherapy alone.不可切除的肝内胆管癌:与单纯全身化疗相比,全身化疗联合肝动脉灌注化疗可延长生存期。
Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;122(5):758-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29824. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy and resection versus resection alone in patients with low-risk resectable colorectal liver metastases - the multicenter randomized controlled PUMP trial.低危可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者中辅助性肝动脉灌注泵化疗联合切除术与单纯切除术的比较——多中心随机对照 PUMP 试验。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5515-6.
10
Morbidity of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver.辅助性肝动脉灌注泵化疗在治疗结直肠癌肝转移中的发病率。
Am J Surg. 2004 Dec;188(6):714-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.042.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological Resectability Criteria for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Preoperative Framework for Multidisciplinary Management.肝内胆管癌的肿瘤可切除性标准:多学科管理的术前框架
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17776-x.
2
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Insights on molecular testing, targeted therapies, and future directions from a multidisciplinary panel.肝内胆管癌:多学科专家小组对分子检测、靶向治疗及未来方向的见解
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Jun 9;9(7). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000743. eCollection 2025 Jul 1.
3
Prognostic significance of the number of hepatic lesions in multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after radical resection: an IPTW propensity-score analysis.根治性切除术后多灶性肝内胆管癌肝内病灶数量的预后意义:一项逆概率加权倾向评分分析
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 23;25(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13737-5.
4
Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis of efficacy and safety.肝动脉灌注化疗与全身化疗用于不可切除肝内胆管癌的疗效及安全性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 May 1;15(5):4387-4399. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2067. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
5
Conversion treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Opportunities and challenges.晚期肝内胆管癌的转化治疗:机遇与挑战。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 21;31(15):104901. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i15.104901.
6
Efficacy and safety of arterial FOLFOX chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.动脉内FOLFOX化疗联合抗PD-(L)1免疫疗法作为不可切除肝内胆管癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Feb 28;16(1):209-225. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-552. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
7
Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer.泛亚地区适应性欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床实践指南:胆道癌的诊断、治疗和随访。
ESMO Open. 2024 Aug;9(8):103647. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103647. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
8
Has Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Evolved with the Evidence? Trends and Practice Patterns from the National Cancer Database.肝内胆管癌的治疗是否随着循证医学证据的发展而变化?来自国家癌症数据库的趋势和实践模式。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;31(10):6551-6563. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15724-9. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Primary and Secondary Malignancies of the Liver: State of the Art and Current High-Level Evidence.肝脏动脉灌注化疗治疗肝脏原发性和继发性恶性肿瘤:现状和当前高级别证据。
Pharmacology. 2024;109(2):86-97. doi: 10.1159/000537887. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
10
Clinical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: surgical approaches and systemic therapies.肝内胆管癌的临床管理:手术方法与全身治疗
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 24;14:1321683. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1321683. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌结局的遗传决定因素。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1429-1444. doi: 10.1002/hep.31829.
2
Oncological relevance of major hepatectomy with inferior vena cava resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌行下腔静脉切除的根治性肝切除术的肿瘤学相关性。
HPB (Oxford). 2021 Sep;23(9):1439-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
3
Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Post Hoc Analysis of the ABC-01, -02, and -03 Clinical Trials.高级肝内胆管癌:ABC-01、-02 和-03 临床试验的事后分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Feb 1;112(2):200-210. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz071.
4
Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study.卡培他滨对比观察用于可切除胆管癌(BILCAP):一项随机、对照、多中心、3 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):663-673. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30915-X. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
Survival after Resection of Multiple Tumor Foci of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管细胞癌多个肿瘤病灶切除术后的生存情况。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Nov;23(11):2239-2246. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04184-2. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
Dose escalation of radiotherapy in unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.不可切除的肝外胆管癌的放疗剂量递增。
Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):4880-4892. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1734. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
7
Prognostic comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统对肝内胆管癌预后的比较。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Apr;25(4):240-248. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.543.
8
Hepatic intra-arterial injection of irinotecan drug eluting beads (DEBIRI) for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review.肝动脉内注射伊立替康药物洗脱微球(DEBIRI)治疗不可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者:一项系统评价
Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;26(3):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 22.
9
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Molecular markers for diagnosis and prognosis.肝内胆管癌:诊断和预后的分子标志物
Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;26(2):125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.美国癌症联合委员会第7版和第8版肝内胆管癌分期系统的比较性能
J Surg Oncol. 2017 May;115(6):696-703. doi: 10.1002/jso.24569. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

肝动脉灌注泵化疗与切除术治疗多灶性肝内胆管细胞癌的比较。

Comparison of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pump Chemotherapy vs Resection for Patients With Multifocal Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):590-596. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1298.

DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1298
PMID:35544131
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9096688/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is often multifocal (ie, satellites or intrahepatic metastases) at presentation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with multifocal iCCA after hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) floxuridine chemotherapy vs resection.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, patients with histologically confirmed, multifocal iCCA were eligible. The HAIP group consisted of consecutive patients from a single center who underwent HAIP floxuridine chemotherapy for unresectable multifocal iCCA between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2018. The resection group consisted of consecutive patients from 12 centers who underwent a curative-intent resection for multifocal iCCA between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2017. Resectable metastatic disease to regional lymph nodes and previous systemic therapy were permitted. Patients with distant metastatic disease (ie, stage IV), those who underwent resection before starting HAIP floxuridine chemotherapy, and those who received a liver transplant were excluded. Data were analyzed on September 1, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall survival in the 2 treatment groups was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients with multifocal iCCA were included: 141 in the HAIP group (median [IQR] age, 62 [53-70] years; 79 [56.0%] women) and 178 in the resection group (median [IQR] age, 60 [50-69] years; 91 [51.1%] men). The HAIP group was characterized by a higher percentage of bilobar disease (88.0% [n = 124] vs 34.3% [n = 61]), larger tumors (median, 8.4 cm vs 7.0 cm), and a higher proportion of patients with 4 or more lesions (66.7% [94] vs 24.2% [43]). Postoperative mortality after 30 days was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.0%-2.1%) in the HAIP group vs 6.2% (95% CI, 2.3%-9.7%) in the resection group (P = .01). The median OS for HAIP was 20.3 months vs 18.9 months for resection (P = .32). Five-year OS in patients with 2 or 3 lesions was 23.7% (95% CI, 12.3%-45.7%) in the HAIP group vs 25.7% (95% CI, 17.9%-37.0%) in the resection group. Five-year OS in patients with 4 or more lesions was 5.0% (95% CI, 1.7%-14.3%) in the HAIP group vs 6.8% (95% CI, 1.8%-25.3%) in the resection group. After adjustment for tumor diameter, number of tumors, and lymph node metastases, the hazard ratio of HAIP vs resection was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.55-1.03; P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that patients with multifocal iCCA had similar OS after HAIP floxuridine chemotherapy vs resection. Resection of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma needs to be considered carefully given the complication rate of major liver resection; HAIP floxuridine chemotherapy may be an effective alternative option.

摘要

重要性

肝内胆管细胞癌(iCCA)在初诊时常为多灶性(即卫星灶或肝内转移)。

目的

比较多灶性 iCCA 患者接受肝动脉灌注泵(HAIP)氟尿嘧啶化疗与切除术的总生存期(OS)。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项队列研究中,符合组织学证实的多灶性 iCCA 患者有资格入组。HAIP 组由来自单一中心的连续患者组成,他们于 2001 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间因不可切除的多灶性 iCCA 接受 HAIP 氟尿嘧啶化疗。切除术组由来自 12 个中心的连续患者组成,他们于 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间因多灶性 iCCA 接受根治性切除术。允许存在区域淋巴结转移性疾病和先前的系统治疗。排除远处转移性疾病(即 IV 期)患者、在开始 HAIP 氟尿嘧啶化疗之前接受切除术的患者和接受肝移植的患者。数据分析于 2021 年 9 月 1 日进行。

主要结果和测量

使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和对数秩检验比较 2 个治疗组的总生存期。

结果

共纳入 319 例多灶性 iCCA 患者:HAIP 组 141 例(中位[IQR]年龄,62[53-70]岁;79[56.0%]女性)和切除术组 178 例(中位[IQR]年龄,60[50-69]岁;91[51.1%]男性)。HAIP 组的特征为更高的双侧疾病发生率(88.0%[n=124] vs 34.3%[n=61])、更大的肿瘤(中位数,8.4 cm vs 7.0 cm)和更多的患者存在 4 个或更多病灶(66.7%[94] vs 24.2%[43])。HAIP 组术后 30 天死亡率为 0.8%(95%CI,0.0%-2.1%),切除术组为 6.2%(95%CI,2.3%-9.7%)(P=0.01)。HAIP 的中位 OS 为 20.3 个月,切除术为 18.9 个月(P=0.32)。2 个或 3 个病灶患者的 5 年 OS 分别为 HAIP 组 23.7%(95%CI,12.3%-45.7%)和切除术组 25.7%(95%CI,17.9%-37.0%)。4 个或更多病灶患者的 5 年 OS 分别为 HAIP 组 5.0%(95%CI,1.7%-14.3%)和切除术组 6.8%(95%CI,1.8%-25.3%)。在调整肿瘤直径、肿瘤数量和淋巴结转移后,HAIP 与切除术的风险比为 0.75(95%CI,0.55-1.03;P=0.07)。

结论和相关性

这项队列研究发现,多灶性 iCCA 患者接受 HAIP 氟尿嘧啶化疗与切除术的 OS 相似。鉴于肝切除术的主要肝切除并发症发生率,需要仔细考虑多灶性肝内胆管细胞癌的切除术;HAIP 氟尿嘧啶化疗可能是一种有效的替代方案。