The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Ultrasound department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 May 6;101(18):e29139. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029139.
Shear wave elastography and strain elastography are two new ultrasonic techniques developed rapidly in recent years. Changes in tissue elasticity occur after normal tissue changes. Elastography technique transforms the elastic information of tissue into optical information for display. Thus more intuitive display of tissue elasticity. Due to the differences in principles and related imaging parameters between the two elastic imaging methods, and the acquisition and interpretation of image data in strain elastic imaging method largely depends on the experience of inspectors, and due to the significant differences between the techniques of inspectors, As a result, conflicting results have been obtained in different scholars' studies on the accuracy comparison of the two elastography techniques in the diagnosis of breast tumors. This meta-analysis aims to compare the accuracy of the two elastography methods in the diagnosis of breast tumors, so as to provide more accurate diagnostic means for patients with breast tumors. The final results will show which elastography method is more accurate in the diagnosis of breast tumors, reduce unnecessary biopsies and provide a reference for clinical decision making.
We will examine published and unpublished randomized controlled trials, observational studies and abstracts without publication type or language restrictions, and search relevant literatures in PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang Database, CNQI and other databases until December 30, 2020. The authors will independently search relevant literature records, scan titles and abstracts, full text, collect data and assess the risk of bias. Data will be analyzed by using Meta Disc1.4 software and Stata14.0 software. Heterogeneity tests and combined sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve will be performed by using Meta Disc1.4 software. Stata14.0 software will be used for sensitivity analysis and publication bias test.
The results of this systematic review will demonstrate the accuracy of the two elastography methods in the diagnosis of breast tumors.
The results will provide useful evidence for the comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography and strain elastography in breast tumors.
This study was not funded. Register name: PROSPERO. Registration number: CRD42021251110.
剪切波弹性成像和应变成像弹性技术是近年来迅速发展起来的两种新的超声技术。组织弹性的变化发生在正常组织变化之后。弹性成像技术将组织的弹性信息转化为光学信息进行显示。因此,组织弹性的显示更加直观。由于两种弹性成像方法的原理和相关成像参数不同,并且应变成像弹性方法中图像数据的采集和解释在很大程度上依赖于检查者的经验,并且由于检查者技术之间存在显著差异,因此,不同学者在两种弹性成像技术对乳腺肿瘤诊断准确性的比较研究中得出了相互矛盾的结果。这项荟萃分析旨在比较两种弹性成像方法在诊断乳腺肿瘤中的准确性,以便为乳腺肿瘤患者提供更准确的诊断手段。最终结果将显示哪种弹性成像方法在诊断乳腺肿瘤方面更准确,减少不必要的活检,并为临床决策提供参考。
我们将检查已发表和未发表的随机对照试验、观察性研究和摘要,不限制出版类型或语言,并在 PubMed、Web of Science、万方数据库、CNKI 等数据库中搜索相关文献,直到 2020 年 12 月 30 日。作者将独立搜索相关文献记录、扫描标题和摘要、全文、收集数据和评估偏倚风险。使用 Meta Disc1.4 软件和 Stata14.0 软件分析数据。使用 Meta Disc1.4 软件进行异质性检验和合并敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比、诊断优势比和汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积。Stata14.0 软件将用于敏感性分析和发表偏倚检验。
本系统评价的结果将表明两种弹性成像方法在诊断乳腺肿瘤中的准确性。
结果将为剪切波弹性成像和应变成像弹性技术在乳腺肿瘤诊断中的准确性比较提供有用的证据。
本研究没有资金支持。注册名称:PROSPERO。注册号:CRD42021251110。