London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Applied Statistical Methods in Medical Research Group, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain.
PLoS One. 2022 May 12;17(5):e0267011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267011. eCollection 2022.
Interpretation of clinical trial results testing vaginal microbicide gels for HIV prevention depends on participant adherence. Prior to the era of antiretrovirals, microbicide trials collected adherence data via self-report, and trials typically reported trial population adherence as overall averages in primary results manuscripts. This study first sought to determine if different patterns of adherence from three trials of vaginal microbicide gels could be identified, using self-reported data and if so, how those patterns compare across trials. The second objective was to explore which individual-level factors were associated with different adherence patterns.
Data from the following three clinical trials of vaginal microbicides were used for this study: HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 035 testing PRO 2000 and Buffergel, the Microbicides Development Programme (MDP) 301 testing PRO 2000, and the Population Council's Carraguard study, testing Carraguard gel. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to identify longitudinal patterns of adherence using self-reported data about gel use. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate relative risk-ratios for factors which were independently associated with different latent adherence trajectories within each trial, and compared across trials.
Included in this analysis are 2,282 women from HPTN 035 (age 17-56 years), 6238 women from MDP 301 (age 16-75 years), and 6039 women from Carraguard (age 16-73 years). Using LCA, 3-4 different patterns of gel adherence were identified in each trial; these patterns were similar across the trials. Factors associated with adherence patterns were identified in all trials. Older age was associated with the adherence trajectory that consistently reported gel use in three trials. Participant-reported negative reaction of partners to the gel was associated with trajectories that reported less consistent adherence in two trials. A greater number of baseline-reported sex partners or sex acts was associated with trajectories which reported less consistent adherence in some trials. Trial site location was associated with membership of trajectories in all trials.
LCA was able to identify patterns of microbicide gel adherence in clinical trials that used self-reported data. Key factors associated with patterns of adherence in this study were participant age, clinical trial site location, and partner reaction to the study gel. These findings, in particular, age and perceived partner reaction to the method, are consistent with results from other clinical trials and programmatic rollout of biomedical HIV prevention methods for women in Africa. This study contributes to the body of evidence that women need more support to navigate power dynamics within their relationships with men so that they can successfully use HIV prevention methods.
检测阴道杀微生物剂预防艾滋病毒的临床试验结果的解释取决于参与者的依从性。在抗逆转录病毒药物时代之前,杀微生物剂试验通过自我报告收集依从性数据,并且试验通常在主要结果手稿中报告试验人群的总体平均依从性。本研究首先试图确定是否可以使用自我报告的数据识别出三种阴道杀微生物剂凝胶试验中的不同依从模式,如果可以,那么这些模式在试验之间如何比较。第二个目标是探索哪些个体因素与不同的依从模式相关。
本研究使用了以下三项阴道杀微生物剂临床试验的数据:艾滋病毒预防试验网络(HPTN)035 测试 PRO 2000 和缓冲凝胶、微观方案发展计划(MDP)301 测试 PRO 2000 以及人口理事会的 Carraguard 研究,测试 Carraguard 凝胶。潜在类别分析(LCA)用于使用关于凝胶使用的自我报告数据来识别依从性的纵向模式。多变量逻辑回归用于估计与每个试验内不同潜在依从轨迹独立相关的因素的相对风险比,并在试验之间进行比较。
本分析包括 HPTN 035 中的 2282 名年龄为 17-56 岁的女性、MDP 301 中的 6238 名年龄为 16-75 岁的女性和 Carraguard 中的 6039 名年龄为 16-73 岁的女性。使用 LCA,在每个试验中确定了 3-4 种不同的凝胶依从模式;这些模式在试验之间相似。在所有试验中都确定了与依从模式相关的因素。年龄较大与在三个试验中始终报告使用凝胶的依从轨迹有关。参与者报告的伴侣对凝胶的负面反应与在两个试验中报告不那么一致的依从轨迹有关。在一些试验中,基线报告的性伴侣或性行为次数越多,与报告不那么一致的依从轨迹有关。试验地点与所有试验中的轨迹成员有关。
LCA 能够在使用自我报告数据的临床试验中识别杀微生物剂凝胶依从模式。本研究中与依从模式相关的关键因素是参与者年龄、临床试验地点和伴侣对研究凝胶的反应。这些发现,特别是年龄和感知到的伴侣对该方法的反应,与其他临床试验和在非洲为妇女提供基于生物医学的艾滋病毒预防方法的方案推出的结果一致。本研究为以下观点提供了证据,即妇女需要更多支持来驾驭她们与男子关系中的权力动态,以便她们能够成功使用艾滋病毒预防方法。