Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Central Michigan University and Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Sep;109(3):226-237. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13790. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). Historically, VOC episodes have been assessed through medical utilization, thereby excluding events managed at home. In order to validate a daily patient-reported outcome for patients with SCD to accurately report their VOC status and experience of a pain crisis, a SCD Diary was included in Evaluation of Longitudinal Pain Study in Sickle Cell Disease (ELIPSIS), a longitudinal, six-month, non-interventional study. The daily patient-completed diary included a description of SCD pain crisis, followed by questions on: pain crisis in the past 24 h (VOC Day question; respective response yes or no), worst pain, tiredness, and functioning. Thirty-five patients with SCD participated in ELIPSIS. Analyses were performed to validate the patient-reported VOC Day. Mean symptoms and functioning scores on the first or last VOC Day of a VOC Event were compared using t-tests with the mean of the three non-VOC Days before and after the event. Mean severity of symptoms and functioning scores on all VOC Days compared to all non-VOC Days were higher, with statistically significant mean differences between first/last VOC Days and respective three non-VOC Days (p's < .01). A subset of patients (n = 15) and caregivers (n = 9) were interviewed to evaluate their understanding of the SCD Diary questions. Nearly all confirmed that the pain crisis description accurately described the VOC experience, and participants expressed confidence differentiating SCD crisis pain from everyday pain. These results demonstrate patients can reliably report their experiences with VOC-related pain crises using the SCD Diary.
患有镰状细胞病 (SCD) 的个体经历血管阻塞性危象 (VOC)。从历史上看,VOC 发作是通过医疗利用来评估的,从而排除了在家中管理的事件。为了验证 SCD 患者的日常患者报告结果,以便准确报告他们的 VOC 状况和疼痛危机经历,在一项为期六个月的非干预性纵向研究——镰状细胞病纵向疼痛评估研究 (ELIPSIS) 中,纳入了 SCD 日记。该日记由患者每日填写,内容包括 SCD 疼痛危象描述,然后是关于过去 24 小时疼痛危象 (VOC 日问题;分别回答是或否)、最严重疼痛、疲劳和功能的问题。35 名 SCD 患者参加了 ELIPSIS。进行了分析以验证患者报告的 VOC 日。使用 t 检验比较 VOC 事件的第一或最后一个 VOC 日的平均症状和功能评分与事件前后三个非 VOC 日的平均值。所有 VOC 日的平均症状和功能评分均高于所有非 VOC 日,且第一/最后一个 VOC 日与各自三个非 VOC 日之间的差异具有统计学意义(p 值均 < 0.01)。对一小部分患者 (n = 15) 和护理人员 (n = 9) 进行了访谈,以评估他们对 SCD 日记问题的理解。几乎所有人都确认疼痛危象描述准确描述了 VOC 体验,参与者表示有信心区分 SCD 危机疼痛与日常疼痛。这些结果表明,患者可以使用 SCD 日记可靠地报告与 VOC 相关的疼痛危象经历。