Sokoloff Dmitry D, El Elena S, Pechenyuk Elena V, Carrive Laetitia, Nadot Sophie, Rudall Paula J, Remizowa Margarita V
Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Khoper State Nature Reserve, Varvarino, Russia.
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022 Apr 28;10:868352. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.868352. eCollection 2022.
Molecular phylogenetic analyses have revealed a superclade of mesangiosperms with five extant lineages: monocots, eudicots, magnoliids, and Chloranthaceae. Both and Chloranthaceae are ancient lineages with a long fossil record; their precise placement within mesangiosperms is uncertain. Morphological studies have suggested that they form a clade together with some Cretaceous fossils, including , and . Apart from , members of this clade share unilocular gynoecia commonly interpreted as monomerous with ascidiate carpels. Alternatively, the gynoecium of has also been interpreted as syncarpous with a single fertile carpel (pseudomonomerous). We investigate patterns of morphological, anatomical and developmental variation in gynoecia of three species to explore the controversial interpretation of its gynoecium as either monomerous or pseudomonomerous. We use an angiosperm-wide morphological data set and contrasting tree topologies to estimate the ancestral gynoecium type in both and mesangiosperms. Gynoecia of all three species possess a small (sometimes vestigial) glandular appendage on the abaxial side and an occasionally bifurcating apex. The ovary is usually unilocular with two procambium strands, but sometimes bilocular and/or with three strands in . None of the possible phylogenetic placements strongly suggest apocarpy in the stem lineage of . Rescoring as having two united carpels affects broader-scale reconstructions of the ancestral gynoecium in mesangiosperms. Our interpretation of the glandular appendage as a tepal or staminode homologue makes the ovary inferior, thus resembling (semi)inferior ovaries of most Chloranthaceae and potentially related fossils and . The entire structure of the flower of suggests strong reduction following a long and complex evolutionary history. The widely accepted notion that apocarpy is ancestral in mesangiosperms (and angiosperms) lacks robust support, regardless of which modes of carpel fusion are considered. Our study highlights the crucial importance of incorporating fossils into large-scale analyses to understand character evolution.
单子叶植物、真双子叶植物、木兰类植物和金粟兰科。金粟兰科和菖蒲科都是具有悠久化石记录的古老谱系;它们在中生被子植物中的精确位置尚不确定。形态学研究表明,它们与一些白垩纪化石(包括菖蒲目、睡莲目和木兰藤目)一起形成一个分支。除了菖蒲目,这个分支的成员都具有单室雌蕊,通常被解释为具槽心皮的单体雌蕊。另外,菖蒲目的雌蕊也被解释为具有单个可育心皮的合心皮(假单体)。我们研究了三种菖蒲目植物雌蕊的形态、解剖和发育变异模式,以探讨其雌蕊是单体还是假单体这一有争议的解释。我们使用一个全被子植物的形态数据集和对比的树形拓扑结构来估计菖蒲目和中生被子植物的祖先雌蕊类型。所有三种菖蒲目植物的雌蕊在背面都有一个小的(有时退化的)腺体附属物,顶端偶尔分叉。子房通常是单室的,有两条原形成层束,但在菖蒲科中有时是双室的和/或有三条束。没有任何一种可能的系统发育位置强烈表明菖蒲目茎系中有离生心皮。将菖蒲科重新评分视为具有两个联合心皮会影响中生被子植物祖先雌蕊的更广泛尺度的重建。我们将腺体附属物解释为花被片或退化雄蕊同源物,这使得菖蒲科子房下位,因此类似于大多数金粟兰科及其潜在相关化石菖蒲目和睡莲目的(半)下位子房。菖蒲科花的整体结构表明,在经历了漫长而复杂的进化历史后,其结构大幅简化。无论考虑哪种心皮融合模式,中生被子植物(和被子植物)中离生心皮是祖先特征这一广泛接受的观点都缺乏有力支持。我们的研究强调了将化石纳入大规模分析以理解性状进化的至关重要性。