Hilkens J, Bonfrer J M, Kroezen V, van Eykeren M, Nooyen W, de Jong-Bakker M, Bruning P F
Int J Cancer. 1987 Apr 15;39(4):431-5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910390403.
MAM-6 and CEA serum levels of 136 staged breast cancer patients were determined concomitantly. The sensitivities of the MAM-6 assay using monoclonal antibody (MAb) 115D8 and a polyclonal CEA assay were equally low and only a limited number of patients with early stages of breast cancer showed elevated antigen levels. However, the sensitivity rose to 75% for MAM-6 and to 60% for CEA in stage-IV patients. The levels of both antigens correlated well in the sera of these patients, although MAM-6 serum levels were elevated more frequently, while only in a few cases were MAM-6-negative sera CEA-positive. A group of stage-II breast cancer patients who eventually developed distant metastases was followed in a longitudinal study. Tumor progression or regression was clinically determined and compared with the MAM-6 and CEA serum levels in order to establish the value of each assay for the monitoring of breast cancer. The course of the disease correlated significantly better with changes in MAM-6 antigen levels than with changes in CEA levels (p less than 0.05), being 79% and 42% respectively. The lower correlation of CEA levels with the course of the disease was mainly due to a lower sensitivity of the CEA assay for advanced breast cancer. The specificity of changing MAM-6 and CEA levels was not significantly different. The main advantage of the MAM-6 assay over the CEA assay is the higher sensitivity of the former. In a preliminary study among stage-IV patients a correlation was found between elevated MAM-6 levels and the presence of the estrogen receptor in the primary tumor.
对136例分期乳腺癌患者同时测定MAM - 6和癌胚抗原(CEA)的血清水平。使用单克隆抗体(MAb)115D8的MAM - 6检测法和多克隆CEA检测法的敏感性同样较低,只有少数早期乳腺癌患者的抗原水平升高。然而,在IV期患者中,MAM - 6的敏感性升至75%,CEA的敏感性升至60%。在这些患者的血清中,两种抗原的水平相关性良好,尽管MAM - 6血清水平升高更为频繁,而只有少数病例中MAM - 6阴性血清CEA呈阳性。在一项纵向研究中,对一组最终发生远处转移的II期乳腺癌患者进行了随访。临床确定肿瘤的进展或消退情况,并与MAM - 6和CEA血清水平进行比较,以确定每种检测方法在监测乳腺癌方面的价值。疾病进程与MAM - 6抗原水平变化的相关性明显优于与CEA水平变化的相关性(p小于0.05),分别为79%和42%。CEA水平与疾病进程较低的相关性主要是由于CEA检测法对晚期乳腺癌的敏感性较低。MAM - 6和CEA水平变化的特异性没有显著差异。MAM - 6检测法相对于CEA检测法的主要优势在于前者具有更高的敏感性。在一项针对IV期患者的初步研究中,发现MAM - 6水平升高与原发肿瘤中雌激素受体的存在之间存在相关性。