• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗 ICU 谵妄干预试验的代理-二次贝叶斯分析方案。

Agents intervening against delirium in the intensive care unit trial-Protocol for a secondary Bayesian analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.

Collaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Aug;66(7):898-903. doi: 10.1111/aas.14091. Epub 2022 May 31.

DOI:10.1111/aas.14091
PMID:35580239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9540259/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Delirium is highly prevalent in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The antipsychotic haloperidol is the most frequently used agent to treat delirium although this is not supported by solid evidence. The agents intervening against delirium in the intensive care unit (AID-ICU) trial investigates the effects of haloperidol versus placebo for the treatment of delirium in adult ICU patients.

METHODS

This protocol describes the secondary, pre-planned Bayesian analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes up to day 90 of the AID-ICU trial. We will use Bayesian linear regression models for all count outcomes and Bayesian logistic regression models for all dichotomous outcomes. We will adjust for stratification variables (site and delirium subtype) and use weakly informative priors supplemented with sensitivity analyses using sceptical priors. We will present results as absolute differences (mean differences and risk differences) and relative differences (ratios of means and relative risks). Posteriors will be summarised using median values as point estimates and percentile-based 95% credibility intervals. Probabilities of any benefit/harm, clinically important benefit/harm and clinically unimportant differences will be presented for all outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The results of this secondary, pre-planned Bayesian analysis will complement the primary frequentist analysis of the AID-ICU trial and facilitate a nuanced and probabilistic interpretation of the trial results.

摘要

背景

谵妄在重症监护病房(ICU)中非常普遍,与高发病率和死亡率相关。抗精神病药氟哌啶醇是最常被用于治疗谵妄的药物,尽管这并没有确凿的证据支持。干预 ICU 中谵妄的药物(AID-ICU)试验研究了氟哌啶醇与安慰剂治疗成人 ICU 患者谵妄的效果。

方法

本方案描述了 AID-ICU 试验的主要和次要结局的次要、预先计划的贝叶斯分析,直至第 90 天。我们将对所有计数结果使用贝叶斯线性回归模型,对所有二项结果使用贝叶斯逻辑回归模型。我们将调整分层变量(地点和谵妄亚型),并使用敏感分析使用怀疑先验补充弱信息先验。我们将以绝对差异(平均差异和风险差异)和相对差异(均值比和相对风险)呈现结果。后验将使用中位数作为点估计,并使用基于百分位的 95%可信度区间进行总结。将为所有结局呈现任何获益/危害、临床重要获益/危害和临床不重要差异的概率。

讨论

本二次、预先计划的贝叶斯分析的结果将补充 AID-ICU 试验的主要频率分析,并促进对试验结果进行细致和概率解释。

相似文献

1
Agents intervening against delirium in the intensive care unit trial-Protocol for a secondary Bayesian analysis.抗 ICU 谵妄干预试验的代理-二次贝叶斯分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Aug;66(7):898-903. doi: 10.1111/aas.14091. Epub 2022 May 31.
2
Haloperidol vs. placebo for the treatment of delirium in ICU patients: a pre-planned, secondary Bayesian analysis of the AID-ICU trial.氟哌啶醇与安慰剂治疗 ICU 患者谵妄的比较:AID-ICU 试验的预先计划的、次要贝叶斯分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Apr;49(4):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07024-9. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Agents intervening against delirium in the intensive care unit (AID-ICU) - Protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial of haloperidol in patients with delirium in the ICU.抗 ICU 谵妄干预剂(AID-ICU)试验方案 - 氟哌啶醇治疗 ICU 谵妄患者的随机安慰剂对照试验方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Nov;63(10):1426-1433. doi: 10.1111/aas.13453. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
4
The Agents Intervening against Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit Trial (AID-ICU trial): A detailed statistical analysis plan.重症监护病房谵妄干预试验(AID-ICU试验):详细统计分析计划。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Oct;64(9):1357-1364. doi: 10.1111/aas.13661. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
5
Long-term outcomes with haloperidol versus placebo in acutely admitted adult ICU patients with delirium.氟哌啶醇与安慰剂治疗急性入住成人重症监护病房谵妄患者的长期结局
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jan;50(1):103-113. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07282-7. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
Mortality and HRQoL in ICU patients with delirium: Protocol for 1-year follow-up of AID-ICU trial.ICU 谵妄患者的死亡率和 HRQoL:AID-ICU 试验的 1 年随访方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Nov;64(10):1519-1525. doi: 10.1111/aas.13679. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
7
Conservative vs. liberal fluid therapy in septic shock - Protocol for secondary Bayesian analyses of the CLASSIC trial.在感染性休克中进行保守与自由的液体治疗 - CLASSIC 试验的二次贝叶斯分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):767-771. doi: 10.1111/aas.14058. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
8
Haloperidol for the Treatment of Delirium in ICU Patients.氟哌啶醇用于治疗重症监护病房患者的谵妄
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 29;387(26):2425-2435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211868. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
9
Interventions for preventing intensive care unit delirium in adults.成人重症监护病房谵妄的预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 23;11(11):CD009783. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009783.pub2.
10
Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of antipsychotics for intensive care unit delirium: the MIND randomized, placebo-controlled trial.抗精神病药治疗 ICU 谵妄的可行性、疗效和安全性:MIND 随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):428-37. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181c58715.

引用本文的文献

1
Haloperidol vs. placebo for the treatment of delirium in ICU patients: a pre-planned, secondary Bayesian analysis of the AID-ICU trial.氟哌啶醇与安慰剂治疗 ICU 患者谵妄的比较:AID-ICU 试验的预先计划的、次要贝叶斯分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Apr;49(4):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07024-9. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Conservative vs. liberal fluid therapy in septic shock - Protocol for secondary Bayesian analyses of the CLASSIC trial.在感染性休克中进行保守与自由的液体治疗 - CLASSIC 试验的二次贝叶斯分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Jul;66(6):767-771. doi: 10.1111/aas.14058. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
3
Dexamethasone 12 mg versus 6 mg for patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxaemia: a pre-planned, secondary Bayesian analysis of the COVID STEROID 2 trial.地塞米松 12 毫克对比 6 毫克治疗 COVID-19 伴严重低氧血症患者:COVID-STEROID 2 试验的预先计划的二次贝叶斯分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;48(1):45-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06573-1. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Higher vs Lower Doses of Dexamethasone in Patients with COVID-19 and Severe Hypoxia (COVID STEROID 2) trial: Protocol for a secondary Bayesian analysis.COVID-19 伴严重低氧血症患者应用高剂量与低剂量地塞米松的疗效比较(COVID 类固醇 2 试验):二次贝叶斯分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021 May;65(5):702-710. doi: 10.1111/aas.13793. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
5
Bayesian and heterogeneity of treatment effect analyses of the HOT-ICU trial-A secondary analysis protocol.贝叶斯和治疗效果异质性分析 HOT-ICU 试验——二次分析方案。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Oct;64(9):1376-1381. doi: 10.1111/aas.13669. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
The Agents Intervening against Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit Trial (AID-ICU trial): A detailed statistical analysis plan.重症监护病房谵妄干预试验(AID-ICU试验):详细统计分析计划。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Oct;64(9):1357-1364. doi: 10.1111/aas.13661. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Assessment of assumptions of statistical analysis methods in randomised clinical trials: the what and how.评估随机临床试验中统计分析方法的假设:内容和方法。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Jun;26(3):121-126. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111268. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
8
Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial.成年 ICU 患者预防性使用泮托拉唑的治疗效果的异质性:SUP-ICU 试验的事后分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):717-726. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05903-8. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
9
Haloperidol for the treatment of delirium in critically ill patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.氟哌啶醇治疗危重症患者谵妄的系统评价:Meta 分析和试验序贯分析。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Feb;64(2):254-266. doi: 10.1111/aas.13501. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
10
Which Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine Have Shown Reduced Mortality? A Systematic Review.哪些重症监护医学多中心随机对照试验显示降低了死亡率?系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1680-1691. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004000.