Laparascopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Obes Surg. 2022 Aug;32(8):2582-2590. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06107-8. Epub 2022 May 18.
The present study aimed to compare two newly introduced procedures, single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) with ileal (SASI) bypass in terms of weight loss, remission of obesity-associated medical problems, complications, and nutritional status.
This retrospective study was carried out with 162 patients who underwent single anastomosis sleeve gastrointestinal bypass from October 2017 to September 2021, either single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass (SASJ) or single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). The main outcome measures were weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems, nutritional status, and complications at 12 months post-surgery.
At 12 months, both groups showed significant weight loss and remission in obesity-associated medical problems. There were significant differences in body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL), and excess weight loss (EWL) between SASI and SASJ bypass (P < 0.05). Improvements in associated medical problems after the two procedures were similar except for hypertension. The reversal surgery rate of the SASI group was significantly higher than that of the SASJ group (5.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.03).
SASJ and SASI bypass achieved satisfactory weight loss and improvement in obesity-associated medical problems that were comparable between the two groups. SASI bypass was followed by a significant difference in the rate of reversal surgery at 1 year due to a short common channel, which was not observed after SASJ bypass.
本研究旨在比较两种新引入的手术方式,即单吻合口袖状空肠旁路术(SASJ)与空肠旁路术(SASI),在体重减轻、肥胖相关医疗问题缓解、并发症和营养状况方面的差异。
本回顾性研究纳入了 2017 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月期间接受单吻合口袖状胃旁路手术的 162 例患者,包括单吻合口袖状空肠旁路术(SASJ)和单吻合口袖状空肠旁路术(SASI)。主要观察指标为术后 12 个月的体重减轻和肥胖相关医疗问题的缓解、营养状况和并发症。
两组在术后 12 个月时均显示出显著的体重减轻和肥胖相关医疗问题的缓解。SASI 和 SASJ 旁路之间在体重指数(BMI)、总体重减轻(TWL)和多余体重减轻(EWL)方面存在显著差异(P<0.05)。两种手术方式在相关医疗问题的改善方面相似,但高血压除外。SASI 组的逆转手术率明显高于 SASJ 组(5.5%比 0.0%,p=0.03)。
SASJ 和 SASI 旁路术均能达到满意的体重减轻和肥胖相关医疗问题的改善,两组之间效果相当。由于 SASI 旁路的短共同通道,1 年后逆转手术率显著升高,而 SASJ 旁路术后未见这种情况。