Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
BMC Cancer. 2022 May 18;22(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09660-8.
Whether pioglitazone may affect breast cancer risk in female diabetes patients is not conclusive and has not been investigated in the Asian populations.
The reimbursement database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance was used to enroll an unmatched cohort and a propensity score-matched cohort of ever users and never users of pioglitazone in female patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes during 1999-2008. The patients were alive on January 1, 2009 and were followed up for breast cancer incidence until December 31, 2011. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios for ever users and tertiles of cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy versus never users, and for cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy treated as a continuous variable. Three models were created for the unmatched cohort and the matched cohort, respectively: 1) without adjustment for covariates; 2) after adjustment for covariates that differed with statistical significance (P-value < 0.05) between ever users and never users; and 3) after adjustment for all covariates.
There were 174,233 never users and 6926 ever users in the unmatched cohort; and 6926 never users and 6926 ever users in the matched cohort. After a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the numbers of incident breast cancer were 1044 in never users and 35 in ever users in the unmatched cohort and were 41 and 35, respectively, in the matched cohort. Hazard ratios suggested a null association between pioglitazone and breast cancer in all three models in either the unmatched cohort or the matched cohort. The overall hazard ratio after adjustment for all covariates was 0.758 (95% confidence interval: 0.539-1.065) in the unmatched cohort and was 0.824 (95% confidence interval: 0.524-1.296) in the matched cohort. None of the hazard ratios for the tertiles of cumulative duration of pioglitazone therapy and for the cumulative duration being treated as a continuous variable were statistically significant.
This study suggests a null association between pioglitazone and breast cancer risk in female patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, because of the small breast cancer cases and the limited follow-up time, further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
吡格列酮是否会影响女性糖尿病患者的乳腺癌风险尚无定论,且尚未在亚洲人群中进行研究。
本研究使用台湾全民健康保险理赔数据库,纳入了 1999 年至 2008 年间新诊断为 2 型糖尿病的女性患者中吡格列酮的既往使用者和未使用者的未匹配队列和倾向评分匹配队列。患者于 2009 年 1 月 1 日存活,并随访至 2011 年 12 月 31 日,以记录乳腺癌发病情况。使用 Cox 回归估计了既往使用者与未使用者相比,吡格列酮累积治疗时间的各三分位与从未使用者相比的风险比,以及将累积吡格列酮治疗时间作为连续变量时的风险比。为未匹配队列和匹配队列分别建立了 3 个模型:1)未调整协变量;2)调整了既往使用者和未使用者之间差异有统计学意义(P 值<0.05)的协变量;3)调整了所有协变量。
在未匹配队列中,有 174233 名未使用者和 6926 名既往使用者;在匹配队列中,有 6926 名未使用者和 6926 名既往使用者。中位随访 2.8 年后,未使用者中发生乳腺癌的例数为 1044 例,既往使用者为 35 例;在匹配队列中,分别为 41 例和 35 例。在所有 3 个模型中,吡格列酮与乳腺癌的风险均呈无关联。在未匹配队列中,经所有协变量调整后的总风险比为 0.758(95%置信区间:0.539-1.065),在匹配队列中为 0.824(95%置信区间:0.524-1.296)。累积吡格列酮治疗时间三分位数和累积时间作为连续变量的风险比均无统计学意义。
本研究表明,在 2 型糖尿病女性患者中,吡格列酮与乳腺癌风险之间无关联。然而,由于乳腺癌病例较少且随访时间有限,需要进一步研究来证实我们的发现。