Suppr超能文献

核扫描:一种减少心脏导管插入术需求的临床决策工具。

Nuclear scans: a clinical decision making tool that reduces the need for cardiac catheterization.

作者信息

Wassertheil-Smoller S, Steingart R M, Wexler J P, Tobin J, Budner N, Wachspress J, Lense L, Slagle S

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):385-97. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90172-x.

Abstract

We have assessed the impact of cardiovascular nuclear medicine studies (CVNMS) on physicians' decisions to send patients with suspected ischemic heart disease (N = 439) on to cardiac catheterization at three Bronx hospitals. A change in management plans with respect to catheterization was observed in 31% of cases. Catheterization rates were reduced by 25% among patients referred for resting studies and by 49% for exercise studies (thallium perfusion or exercise wall motion studies). Results of CVNMS had little impact on catheterization decisions for resting study patients (N = 192). Among exercise study patients (N = 247), those with normal results had a relative reduction in catheterization post-CVNMS of 82% vs 27% for patients with abnormal results (p less than 0.001). However, impact of exercise CVNMS test results on post-CVNMS catheterization rates obtained for men only; women with abnormal exercise study results were much less likely to undergo subsequent catheterization (7.7%) than men with abnormal results (41.9%), p less than 0.005, independent of age. The apparent discrepancy in referral for catheterization based on sex needs to be investigated further.

摘要

我们评估了心血管核医学研究(CVNMS)对三家布朗克斯医院中因疑似缺血性心脏病而被转诊的患者(N = 439)进行心脏导管插入术的医生决策的影响。在31%的病例中观察到了关于导管插入术的管理计划变化。对于接受静息研究的患者,导管插入率降低了25%,对于运动研究(铊灌注或运动壁运动研究)的患者,导管插入率降低了49%。CVNMS的结果对静息研究患者(N = 192)的导管插入决策影响不大。在运动研究患者(N = 247)中,结果正常的患者在CVNMS后导管插入率相对降低了82%,而结果异常的患者为27%(p < 0.001)。然而,运动CVNMS测试结果的影响仅针对男性患者的CVNMS后导管插入率;运动研究结果异常的女性患者比结果异常的男性患者(41.9%)接受后续导管插入术的可能性要小得多(7.7%),p < 0.005,与年龄无关。基于性别的导管插入术转诊中明显的差异需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验