Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病的胰岛移植:来自加拿大单中心队列的 20 年经验。

Pancreatic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes: 20-year experience from a single-centre cohort in Canada.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico; CHRISTUS-LatAm Hub-Excellence and Innovation Center, Monterrey, Mexico.

Clinical Islet Transplant Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Jul;10(7):519-532. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00114-0. Epub 2022 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation offers an effective treatment for selected people with type 1 diabetes and intractable hypoglycaemia. Long-term experience, however, remains limited. We report outcomes from a single-centre cohort up to 20 years after islet transplantation.

METHODS

This cohort study included patients older than 18 years with type 1 diabetes undergoing allogeneic islet transplantation between March 11, 1999, and Oct 1, 2019, at the University of Alberta Hospital (Edmonton, AB, Canada). Patients who underwent islet-after-kidney transplantation and islet transplantation alone or islet transplantation before whole-pancreas transplantation (follow-up was censored at the time of whole-pancreas transplantation) were included. Patient survival, graft survival (fasting plasma C-peptide >0·1 nmol/L), insulin independence, glycaemic control, and adverse events are reported. To identify factors associated with prolonged graft survival, recipients with sustained graft survival (≥90% of patient follow-up duration) were compared with those who had non-sustained graft survival (<90% of follow-up duration). Multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were done to determine predictors of sustained graft survival.

FINDINGS

Between March 11, 1999, and Oct 1, 2019, 255 patients underwent islet transplantation and were included in the analyses (149 [58%] were female and 218 [85%] were White). Over a median follow-up of 7·4 years (IQR 4·4-12·2), 230 (90%) patients survived. Median graft survival was 5·9 years (IQR 3·0-9·5), and graft failure occurred in 91 (36%) patients. 178 (70%) recipients had sustained graft survival, and 77 (30%) had non-sustained graft survival. At baseline, compared with patients with non-sustained graft survival, those with sustained graft survival had longer median type 1 diabetes duration (33·5 years [IQR 24·3-41·7] vs 26·2 years [17·0-35·5]; p=0·0003), median older age (49·4 years [43·5-56·1] vs 44·2 years [35·4-54·2]; p=0·0011), and lower median insulin requirements (0·53 units/kg per day [0·45-0·67] vs 0·59 units/kg per day [0·48-0·70]; p=0·032), but median HbA concentrations were similar (8·2% [7·5-9·0] vs 8·5% [7·8-9·2]; p=0·23). 201 (79%) recipients had insulin independence, with a Kaplan-Meier estimate of 61% (95% CI 54-67) at 1 year, 32% (25-39) at 5 years, 20% (14-27) at 10 years, 11% (6-18) at 15 years, and 8% (2-17) at 20 years. Patients with sustained graft survival had significantly higher rates of insulin independence (160 [90%] of 178 vs 41 [53%] of 77; p<0·0001) and sustained improvements in glycaemic control mixed-main-effects model group effect, p<0·0001) compared with those with non-sustained graft survival. Multivariate analyses identified the combined use of anakinra plus etanercept (adjusted odds ratio 7·5 [95% CI 2·7-21·0], p<0·0001) and the BETA-2 score of 15 or higher (4·1 [1·5-11·4], p=0·0066) as factors associated with sustained graft survival. In recipients with sustained graft survival, the incidence of procedural complications was lower (23 [5%] of 443 infusions vs 17 [10%] of 167 infusions; p=0·027), whereas the incidence of cancer was higher (29 of [16%] of 178 vs four [5%] of 77; p=0·015) than in those with non-sustained graft survival; most were skin cancers (22 [67%] of 33). End-stage renal disease and severe infections were similar between groups.

INTERPRETATION

We present the largest single-centre cohort study of long-term outcomes following islet transplantation. Although some limitations with our study remain, such as the retrospective component, a relatively small sample size, and the absence of non-transplant controls, we found that the combined use of anakinra plus etanercept and the BETA-2 score were associated with improved outcomes, and therefore these factors could inform clinical practice.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

胰岛移植为选定的 1 型糖尿病和难治性低血糖患者提供了一种有效的治疗方法。然而,长期经验仍然有限。我们报告了在胰岛移植后 20 年内从单一中心队列获得的结果。

方法

这项队列研究纳入了 1999 年 3 月 11 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日期间在加拿大阿尔伯塔大学医院(埃德蒙顿)接受同种异体胰岛移植的年龄大于 18 岁的患者。纳入了接受胰岛-肾移植和单独胰岛移植或胰岛移植前全胰移植的患者(随访在全胰移植时截止)。报告了患者生存、移植物生存(空腹血浆 C 肽>0·1 nmol/L)、胰岛素独立性、血糖控制和不良事件。为了确定与延长移植物生存相关的因素,将持续移植物生存(≥90%的患者随访时间)的受者与非持续移植物生存(<90%的随访时间)的受者进行比较。进行了多变量二项逻辑回归分析,以确定持续移植物生存的预测因素。

结果

1999 年 3 月 11 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日期间,共 255 名患者接受了胰岛移植并纳入了分析(149 名[58%]为女性,218 名[85%]为白人)。在中位数为 7·4 年(IQR 4·4-12·2)的随访中,230 名(90%)患者存活。中位数移植物生存时间为 5·9 年(IQR 3·0-9·5),91 名(36%)患者发生移植物失败。178 名(70%)受者有持续的移植物生存,77 名(30%)受者有非持续的移植物生存。与非持续移植物生存的患者相比,持续移植物生存的患者有更长的 1 型糖尿病病程中位数(33·5 年[IQR 24·3-41·7]vs 26·2 年[17·0-35·5];p=0·0003)、更长的中位年龄(49·4 岁[43·5-56·1]vs 44·2 岁[35·4-54·2];p=0·0011)和更低的中位胰岛素需求(0·53 单位/kg·天[0·45-0·67]vs 0·59 单位/kg·天[0·48-0·70];p=0·032),但中位 HbA1c 浓度相似(8·2%[7·5-9·0]vs 8·5%[7·8-9·2];p=0·23)。201 名(79%)受者达到了胰岛素独立性,Kaplan-Meier 估计在 1 年时的胰岛素独立性率为 61%(95%CI 54-67),5 年时为 32%(25-39),10 年时为 20%(14-27),15 年时为 11%(6-18),20 年时为 8%(2-17)。与非持续移植物生存的患者相比,持续移植物生存的患者胰岛素独立性的比例显著更高(178 名中有 160 名[90%],77 名中有 41 名[53%];p<0·0001),血糖控制混合主效应模型组的改善也更为显著(p<0·0001)。多变量分析确定了联合使用阿那白滞素加依那西普(调整优势比 7·5[95%CI 2·7-21·0],p<0·0001)和 BETA-2 评分≥15(4·1[1·5-11·4],p=0·0066)是与持续移植物生存相关的因素。在持续移植物生存的受者中,程序性并发症的发生率较低(443 次输注中有 23 次[5%],167 次输注中有 17 次[10%];p=0·027),而癌症的发生率较高(178 名中有 29 名[16%],77 名中有 4 名[5%];p=0·015);大多数是皮肤癌(33 例中有 22 例[67%])。两组的终末期肾病和严重感染相似。

解释

我们报告了最大的胰岛移植后长期结果的单中心队列研究。尽管我们的研究仍存在一些局限性,如回顾性成分、样本量相对较小以及缺乏非移植对照,但我们发现联合使用阿那白滞素加依那西普和 BETA-2 评分与改善结果相关,因此这些因素可以为临床实践提供信息。

资助

无。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验