Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 3;13:851887. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.851887. eCollection 2022.
Along with the rising prevalence of high body-mass index (BMI), there is also increased emphasis on leanness and fitness. Both these trends suggest that many individuals are concerned about weight management and may try to lose weight. Using data from the research project "Fitness clubs - a venue for public health?", we aimed to describe weight cycling and energy-restricted dieting in men and women at start-up of fitness club membership, and to investigate influencing factors [age, BMI, educational level, self-classified overweight/obesity, compliance with nutritional guidelines, unhealthy weight control strategies and self-perceived health (SPH)].
In a cross-sectional online survey, 250 men and women from 25 fitness clubs in Oslo, reported anthropometrics, self-classified weight group, weight cycling, weight loss/gain, eating habits/dieting, and background/health information. Enrollment was limited to adult (≥18 years) novice exercisers (exercising <60 min/week at a moderate or vigorous intensity or brisk walking <150 min/week, the past six months) with less than four weeks of membership. Factors associated with weight cycling were examined using simple and multiple logistic regression, separated for men and women.
In both sexes (mean age: 36.4 ± 11.3, range 18-71 years), a high number reported substantial weight fluctuation (+/-5 kg) the past 12 months (men: 50% and women: 62%, mean difference 12%, 95% CI -0.3 to 23.8, p=0.056) and unhealthy weight control strategies (men: 24.8% and women: 47.2%, mean difference 22.4%, 95% CI 10.5 to 33.4, p<0.001). Weight cyclers had a higher mean BMI compared with non-cyclers (mean difference -1.5, 95% CI -2.6 to - 0.4, p= 0.003). Further, the difference in body weight was 6.7 kg (95% CI 2.2 to 10.8, p=0.004) and 10.8 kg (95% CI 5.8 to 15.8, <0.001) in men and women, respectively. Besides BMI status, self-classified overweight/obesity was the strongest predictor of reporting weight cycling (men: OR 5.54, 95% CI 2.03 to 15.12, p<0.01 and women: OR 7.17, 95% CI 2.48 to 20.68, p<0.001).
In novice exercisers, a large proportion reported weight cycling and unhealthy weight control strategies, and both were more prevalent in women than in men. Self-classified overweight was found to be the most important factor influencing weight cycling.
随着高身体质量指数(BMI)的流行,人们对苗条和健康的关注度也越来越高。这两种趋势表明,许多人关注体重管理,并可能试图减肥。利用“健身俱乐部——公共卫生的场所”研究项目的数据,我们旨在描述男性和女性在开始健身俱乐部会员身份时的体重循环和能量限制饮食,并调查影响因素[年龄、BMI、教育水平、自我分类的超重/肥胖、遵守营养指南、不健康的体重控制策略和自我感知健康(SPH)]。
在一项横断面在线调查中,来自奥斯陆 25 个健身俱乐部的 250 名男性和女性报告了人体测量学、自我分类的体重组、体重循环、体重减轻/增加、饮食习惯/节食以及背景/健康信息。参与者仅限于成年(≥18 岁)的新手锻炼者(过去 6 个月中每周进行<60 分钟的适度或剧烈强度运动或快步走<150 分钟),且俱乐部会员身份不到四周。使用简单和多变量逻辑回归分别检查了与体重循环相关的因素,分别针对男性和女性。
在男性和女性中(平均年龄:36.4±11.3,范围 18-71 岁),很多人报告过去 12 个月体重出现较大波动(+/-5 公斤)(男性:50%,女性:62%,平均差异 12%,95%CI-0.3 至 23.8,p=0.056),并采用了不健康的体重控制策略(男性:24.8%,女性:47.2%,平均差异 22.4%,95%CI10.5 至 33.4,p<0.001)。与非循环者相比,体重循环者的平均 BMI 更高(平均差异-1.5,95%CI-2.6 至-0.4,p=0.003)。此外,男性和女性的体重差异分别为 6.7 公斤(95%CI2.2 至 10.8,p=0.004)和 10.8 公斤(95%CI5.8 至 15.8,p<0.001)。除 BMI 状态外,自我分类的超重/肥胖是报告体重循环的最强预测因素(男性:OR5.54,95%CI2.03 至 15.12,p<0.01;女性:OR7.17,95%CI2.48 至 20.68,p<0.001)。
在新手锻炼者中,很大一部分人报告了体重循环和不健康的体重控制策略,且女性比男性更为常见。自我分类的超重是影响体重循环的最重要因素。