Suppr超能文献

比较医生和非医生对于违背患者意愿向其一级亲属告知BRCA1基因突变情况的态度。

Comparing the attitudes of physicians and non-physicians toward communicating a patient's BRCA1 mutation to a first-degree relative against a patient's wishes.

作者信息

Zebrack Jane E, Yang Wei, Milone Matthew, Coppes Max J

机构信息

Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2022 Aug;13(4):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00591-2. Epub 2022 May 21.

Abstract

Although genetic testing can be vastly informative, it creates a dilemma if a patient does not want to disclose an abnormal genetic test to at-risk relatives. A sample of 200 participants from Nevada (100 physicians, 100 non-physicians) completed an 11-item questionnaire asking demographic information, familiarity with genetics and genetic testing, and opinions about a physician's role in a hypothetical case in which a patient does not wish to communicate her BRCA1 mutation to her sister. Although most respondents did not think the physician should notify the sister against the patient's wishes, more non-physicians (40%) than physicians (23%) contended that the physician should do so (p = 0.0119). Most respondents from both groups agreed that the physician should not have the legal duty to notify the sister, would not be morally justified in sharing genetic test results with the sister, but should have the right to notify a patient's relatives if the disease is "serious, preventable, and treatable." More non-physicians than physicians agreed that physicians should have an educational requirement on how to communicate genetic test results to patients and their family (88% vs 65%, p = 0.0002). Most physicians (70%) reported a familiarity/strong familiarity with genetic testing compared to non-physicians (33%; p < 0.0001). Future qualitative research should assess physicians' understanding of issues surrounding familial communication of genetic test results. Educational interventions to facilitate effective communication to patients and families are needed and welcomed by most physicians. Discrepancies between the attitudes of physicians and patients or the public need to be better understood and addressed.

摘要

尽管基因检测能提供大量信息,但如果患者不想将异常的基因检测结果告知有风险的亲属,就会产生两难困境。从内华达州抽取的200名参与者(100名医生、100名非医生)完成了一份包含11个项目的问卷,问卷询问了人口统计学信息、对遗传学和基因检测的熟悉程度,以及在一个假设案例中对医生角色的看法,该案例中一名患者不想将其BRCA1突变告知她的姐姐。尽管大多数受访者认为医生不应违背患者意愿通知其姐姐,但主张医生应该这样做的非医生(40%)比医生(23%)更多(p = 0.0119)。两组中的大多数受访者都认为医生没有法律义务通知其姐姐,与姐姐分享基因检测结果在道德上不合理,但如果疾病“严重、可预防且可治疗”,医生有权通知患者的亲属。主张医生应该接受关于如何向患者及其家人传达基因检测结果的教育要求的非医生比医生更多(88%对65%,p = 0.0

相似文献

2
Disclosure of familial genetic information: perceptions of the duty to inform.
Am J Med. 2000 Dec 15;109(9):705-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00594-5.
4
[Providing or withholding treatment: the role of the patient's wish and priorities in palliative care].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2002 Aug 16;127(33):1690-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33378.
5
The "duty to warn" a patient's family members about hereditary disease risks.
JAMA. 2004 Sep 22;292(12):1469-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.12.1469.
6
The evolving duty to disclose the presence of genetic disease to relatives.
Acad Med. 1998 Sep;73(9):962-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809000-00014.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
More than half the families of mobile intensive care unit patients experience inadequate communication with physicians.
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jul;41(7):1291-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3890-2. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Limited Genomics Training Among Physicians Remains a Barrier to Genomics-Based Implementation of Precision Medicine.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 18;9:757212. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.757212. eCollection 2022.
2
Disclosure of genetic information to family members: a systematic review of normative documents.
Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2038-2046. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01248-0. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
3
What guidance does HIPAA offer to providers considering familial risk notification and cascade genetic testing?
J Law Biosci. 2020 Dec 11;7(1):lsaa071. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa071. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Barriers and facilitators for cascade testing in genetic conditions: a systematic review.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Dec;28(12):1631-1644. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00725-5. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
5
From Genetics to Genomics: Facing the Liability Implications in Clinical Care.
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;48(1):11-43. doi: 10.1177/1073110520916994.
6
Communicating genetic information to family members: analysis of consent forms for diagnostic genomic sequencing.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Sep;28(9):1160-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0627-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
7
The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations.
J Law Biosci. 2019 May 14;6(1):1-36. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsz007. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Recent developments in genetic/genomic medicine.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2019 Mar 5;133(5):697-708. doi: 10.1042/CS20180436. Print 2019 Mar 15.
9
Reconsidering the duty to warn genetically at-risk relatives.
Genet Med. 2018 Mar;20(3):285-290. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.257. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验