Department of General Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Clin Transplant. 2022 Oct;36(10):e14719. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14719.
This systematic review and expert panel recommendation aims to answer the question regarding the routine use of T-tubes or abdominal drains to better manage complications and thereby improve outcomes after liver transplantation.
Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel to assess the potential risks and benefits of T-tubes and intra-abdominal drainage in liver transplantation (CRD42021243036).
Of the 2996 screened records, 33 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 29 (six RCTs) assessed the use of T-tubes and four regarding surgical drains. Although some studies reported less strictures when using a T-tube, there was a trend toward more biliary complications with T-tubes, mainly related to biliary leakage. Due to the small number of studies, there was a paucity of evidence on the effect of abdominal drains with no clear benefit for or against the use of drainage. However, one study investigating the open vs. closed circuit drains found a significantly higher incidence of intra-abdominal infections when open-circuit drains were used.
Due to the potential risk of biliary leakage and infections, the routine intraoperative insertion of T-tubes is not recommended (Level of Evidence moderate - very low; grade of recommendation strong). However, a T-tube can be considered in cases at risk for biliary stenosis. Due to the scant evidence on abdominal drainage, no change in clinical practice in individual centers is recommended. (Level of Evidence very low; weak recommendation).
本系统评价和专家小组建议旨在回答关于常规使用 T 管或腹腔引流管以更好地管理并发症,从而改善肝移植后结局的问题。
遵循 PRISMA 指南并使用源自国际专家小组的 GRADE 方法进行系统评价,以评估 T 管和腹腔引流在肝移植中的潜在风险和获益(CRD42021243036)。
在 2996 篇筛选记录中,有 33 项研究被纳入系统评价,其中 29 项(6 项 RCT)评估了 T 管的使用,4 项评估了手术引流管的使用。尽管一些研究报告使用 T 管时狭窄发生率较低,但 T 管存在更多胆道并发症的趋势,主要与胆漏有关。由于研究数量较少,关于腹腔引流效果的证据不足,没有明确支持或反对引流的证据。然而,一项关于开放与闭路引流的研究发现,使用开放回路引流时,腹腔感染的发生率显著更高。
由于存在胆漏和感染的潜在风险,不推荐常规术中插入 T 管(证据水平为中等-极低;推荐强度为强)。然而,对于有胆道狭窄风险的患者,可以考虑使用 T 管。由于关于腹腔引流的证据有限,不建议个别中心改变临床实践(证据水平极低;弱推荐)。