Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Life Science, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
J Cardiol. 2022 Sep;80(3):204-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 20.
Current guidelines provide recommendation for transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) in severe aortic stenosis without emphasis on valve systems. The comparative performances of balloon-expandable valves (BEV) and self-expanding valves (SEV) remain unclear. We aim to compare the early (30-day) and midterm (1-year) mortality and cardiovascular outcomes of BEV with SEV.
PubMed, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were searched from inception to February 13, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-score matched (PSM) studies. Odds ratios (ORs) for binary outcomes and mean differences for continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effect models (DerSimonian-Laird method) with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance correction. Primary outcomes were early and midterm all-cause mortality.
We included 3 RCTs (1418 patients) and 12 PSM studies (36,540 patients). Compared with SEV, BEV was associated with significantly lower mortality at 30 days (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.85, p < 0.001, I2 = 0) and 1 year (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99, p = 0.04, I2 = 20.4%) in PSM studies, but not RCTs with insufficient power. Similar findings were found in subgroups analysis based on valve generations and SEV types. The 30-day and 1-year cardiovascular mortality, 30-day incidences of moderate to severe paravalvular leak, procedural contrast agent volume, and procedure time were lower, but transvalvular pressure gradient was higher in BEV than SEV in PSM studies. The 30-day incidences of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), acute kidney injury, stroke, major bleeding, major vascular complications, and rehospitalization were not statistically different between BEV and SEV. Early-generation SEV was associated with a higher 30-day PPI risk than corresponding BEV comparators. PPI risk was lower in ACURATE neo (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) but higher in Evolut R SEV (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN), both compared with SAPIEN 3 BEV (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).
PSM studies suggest lower early and midterm mortality in BEV than SEV, but the contribution of unmeasured confounders cannot be excluded. Results from adequately powered RCTs with long-term follow-up are critically needed to confirm these findings.
目前的指南提供了严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的建议,但未强调瓣膜系统。球囊扩张瓣膜(BEV)和自膨式瓣膜(SEV)的比较性能仍不清楚。我们旨在比较 BEV 与 SEV 的早期(30 天)和中期(1 年)死亡率和心血管结局。
从文献创建到 2020 年 2 月 13 日,我们在 PubMed、CENTRAL 和 EMBASE 上搜索了随机对照试验(RCT)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究。使用随机效应模型(DerSimonian-Laird 方法)和 Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman 方差校正,对二项结局的比值比(ORs)和连续结局的均值差异进行了汇总。主要结局是早期和中期全因死亡率。
我们纳入了 3 项 RCT(1418 例患者)和 12 项 PSM 研究(36540 例患者)。与 SEV 相比,PSM 研究中 BEV 30 天(OR 0.76,95%CI 0.67-0.85,p<0.001,I2=0)和 1 年(OR 0.87,95%CI 0.77-0.99,p=0.04,I2=20.4%)死亡率显著降低,但 RCT 因效力不足而未发现统计学意义。基于瓣膜代际和 SEV 类型的亚组分析也得出了类似的结果。PSM 研究中,BEV 的 30 天和 1 年心血管死亡率、30 天中度至重度瓣周漏发生率、手术对比剂用量和手术时间较低,但跨瓣压差较高。PSM 研究中,BEV 与 SEV 的 30 天永久起搏器植入(PPI)、急性肾损伤、卒中和主要出血、主要血管并发症和再住院率无统计学差异。早期代 SEV 与相应的 BEV 比较剂相比,30 天 PPI 风险更高。与 SAPIEN 3 BEV(爱德华兹生命科学公司,尔湾,CA)相比,ACURATE neo(波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州纳提克)的 30 天 PPI 风险较低,但 Evolut R SEV(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)的 PPI 风险较高。
PSM 研究表明,BEV 的早期和中期死亡率低于 SEV,但不能排除未测量混杂因素的影响。需要进行具有长期随访的充分效力的 RCT 来证实这些发现。