Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Dig Endosc. 2022 Nov;34(7):1459-1470. doi: 10.1111/den.14354. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
To generate a prognostic model based on a nomogram for adverse event (AE) prediction after lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) placement in patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFC).
Data from a large multicenter series of PFCs treated with LAMS placement were retrieved. AE (overall and excluding mild events) prediction was calculated through a logistic regression model and a nomogram was created and internally validated after bootstrapping. Results were expressed in terms of odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Discrimination was assessed by c-statistics and calibrated by comparing deciles of predicted and observed ORs.
Overall, 516 patients were included (males 68%, mean age 61.6 ± 15.2 years). PFCs were predominantly walled-off necrosis (52.1%). Independent predictors of AE occurrence were injury of main pancreatic duct (OR in the case of leak 2.51, 95% CI 1.06-5.97, P = 0.03; OR in the case of complete disruption 2.61, 1.53-4.45, P = 0.01), abnormal vessels (OR in the case of perigastric varices 2.90, 1.31-6.42, P = 0.008; OR in the case of pseudoaneurysm 2.99, 1.75-11.93, P = 0.002), using a multigate technique (OR 3.00, 1.28-5.24; P = 0.05), and need of percutaneous drainage (OR 2.81, 1.03-7.65, P = 0.04). By nomogram, a score beyond 200 points corresponded to a 50% probability of AE occurrence. The model was confirmed even when excluding mild AEs and it showed optimal discrimination (c-index 76.8%, 95% CI 74-79), confirmed after internal validation.
Patients with preprocedural evidence of pancreatic duct leak/disruption, vessel alteration, requiring percutaneous drainage or a multigate technique are at higher risk for AE.
基于列线图生成预测胰腺液体积聚(PFC)患者使用 lumen-apposing 金属支架(LAMS)后不良事件(AE)的预测模型。
回顾性分析了一项使用 LAMS 治疗 PFC 的大型多中心系列研究的数据。通过逻辑回归模型计算 AE(总体和不包括轻度事件)的预测值,并创建列线图,通过自举法进行内部验证。结果用比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)表示。通过 C 统计量评估判别能力,并通过比较预测 OR 的十分位数与实际 OR 来评估校准度。
共纳入 516 例患者(男性 68%,平均年龄 61.6±15.2 岁)。PFC 主要为包裹性坏死(52.1%)。AE 发生的独立预测因素包括主胰管损伤(漏的 OR 为 2.51,95%CI 1.06-5.97,P=0.03;完全破裂的 OR 为 2.61,1.53-4.45,P=0.01)、异常血管(胃周静脉曲张的 OR 为 2.90,1.31-6.42,P=0.008;假性动脉瘤的 OR 为 2.99,1.75-11.93,P=0.002)、使用多门技术(OR 3.00,1.28-5.24,P=0.05)和需要经皮引流(OR 2.81,1.03-7.65,P=0.04)。根据列线图,得分超过 200 分,AE 发生的概率为 50%。即使排除轻度 AE,该模型仍得到证实,且内部验证后显示最佳判别能力(C 指数 76.8%,95%CI 74-79)。
术前存在胰管漏/破裂、血管改变、需要经皮引流或多门技术的患者发生 AE 的风险较高。