Radojlovic Jasmina, Kilibarda Tatjana, Radevic Svetlana, Maricic Milena, Parezanovic Ilic Katarina, Djordjic Milan, Colovic Sofija, Radmanovic Branimir, Sekulic Marija, Djordjevic Ognjen, Niciforovic Jovan, Simic Vukomanovic Ivana, Janicijevic Katarina, Radovanovic Snezana
College of Health Studies Milutin Milankovic, Belgrade, Serbia.
Department in Cuprija, The Academy of Applied Preschool Teaching and Health Studies Krusevac, Cuprija, Serbia.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:891930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891930. eCollection 2022.
The aims of our study are related to examining the relevance of teachers' attitudes toward the implementation of inclusive education. In addition, its subject is related to the implications on inclusive education policies, limitations of the existing study along with the recommendations for our future research endeavors.
The research is a cross-sectional study type. The sample included 64 primary school teachers in the lower grades of primary school (grades 1-4), selected by using simple random sampling, in three primary schools on the territory of Belgrade, Serbia in 2021 (26, 17, and 21 primary school teachers). The Questionnaire for Teachers, which was used as a research instrument, was taken from the Master's Thesis Studen Rajke, which was part of the project "Education for the Knowledge Society" at the Institute for Educational Research in Belgrade. Dependent variables measured in the study referred to the attitudes of primary school teachers toward inclusive education. Categorical variables are represented as frequencies and the Chi-square test was used to determine if a distribution of observed frequencies differed from the expected frequencies.
One in three teachers (32.8%) thought that inclusion was useful for children with disabilities (29.7%), of them thought that schools did not have the conditions for inclusive education, whereas one in four teachers (25.0%) believed that inclusion was not good. No statistically significant differences were found in the attitudes of professors, when observed in terms of their gender, age and length of service.
Investing more resources and time in developing and implementing special education policies can promote successful inclusive education.
我们研究的目的是考察教师对全纳教育实施的态度的相关性。此外,其主题涉及全纳教育政策的影响、现有研究的局限性以及对我们未来研究工作的建议。
该研究为横断面研究类型。样本包括2021年在塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德地区三所小学中通过简单随机抽样选取的64名小学低年级(1 - 4年级)教师(分别为26名、17名和21名小学教师)。作为研究工具使用的教师问卷取自硕士论文《Studen Rajke》,该论文是贝尔格莱德教育研究所在“知识社会教育”项目的一部分。研究中测量的因变量涉及小学教师对全纳教育的态度。分类变量以频率表示,采用卡方检验来确定观察频率的分布是否与预期频率不同。
三分之一的教师(32.8%)认为融合对残疾儿童有用(29.7%),其中认为学校没有全纳教育条件的占比为,而四分之一的教师(25.0%)认为融合不好。从性别、年龄和服务年限方面观察时,教授们的态度没有发现统计学上的显著差异。
在制定和实施特殊教育政策方面投入更多资源和时间可以促进成功的全纳教育。