Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2022 Nov;69(7):806-815. doi: 10.1111/zph.12970. Epub 2022 May 23.
California has the highest proportion of unhoused individuals in the country, and up to 25% of unhoused individuals own pets, providing substantial benefits but unique challenges including access to housing, transportation and unfounded grounds for social stigmatization. Unhoused individuals and pets may also be at risk for diseases due to impaired access to sanitation facilities. The purpose of this cross-sectional survey was to evaluate differences in perceived benefits, challenges and public perceptions among pet owners of varying housing security and the prevalence of diseases among their pets. Questionnaires were administered to housed and unhoused pet owners and pet blood screened for rickettsiosis, bartonellosis, ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis, borreliosis, West Nile fever and heartworm. Among 147 canine and 16 feline blood samples, seropositivity of ectoparasitic diseases did not vary by housing status. Among 45 housed and 56 unhoused owners, unhoused owners were significantly more likely to report protective benefits, challenges obtaining housing, finding a flea on their pet, using bottled water for their pet and their pet sleeping in their bed. Housed owners were significantly more likely to report companionship and entertainment benefits, challenges with pet sitting and consistently administering parasite preventatives. Similar (96-98%) percentages stated they would not give up their pet for better housing and 31% of housed pet owners believed that people should not own pets if they do not have secure housing. Social stigma against unhoused pet owners is present within the community, requiring education to change public perception and guide policy regarding housing for pet owners experiencing homelessness.
加利福尼亚州拥有全美最高比例的无家可归者,其中多达 25%的无家可归者拥有宠物,这给他们带来了巨大的好处,但也带来了独特的挑战,包括获得住房、交通以及无端的社会污名化的机会。无家可归者及其宠物也可能因卫生设施使用受限而面临疾病风险。本横断面调查的目的是评估不同住房保障水平的宠物主人对宠物的感知益处、挑战和公众看法的差异,以及他们的宠物中疾病的流行情况。向有房和无房的宠物主人发放了问卷,并对宠物的血液进行了莱姆病、巴尔通体病、埃立克体病、无形体病、莱姆病、西尼罗河热和心丝虫病的筛查。在 147 份犬血样和 16 份猫血样中,根据住房状况,寄生虫病的血清阳性率没有差异。在 45 名有房主人和 56 名无房主人中,无房主人更有可能报告保护益处、获得住房的挑战、在宠物身上发现跳蚤、给宠物使用瓶装水以及让宠物睡在床上。有房主人更有可能报告陪伴和娱乐益处、宠物寄养的挑战以及定期使用寄生虫预防药物。相似(96-98%)的比例表示他们不会为了更好的住房而放弃宠物,31%的有房宠物主人认为,如果人们没有安全的住房,就不应该养宠物。无家可归的宠物主人在社区中面临社会污名化,需要通过教育来改变公众的看法,并指导有关无家可归的宠物主人住房的政策。