Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Birley Fields Campus, Bonsall Street, M156GX, Manchester, UK.
Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Birley Fields Campus, Bonsall Street, M156GX, Manchester, UK.
Physiotherapy. 2022 Sep;116:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
Osteoarthritis is a primary cause of pain and disability, and it places a considerable economic burden on individuals and the society. In the management of total knee or hip replacement (TKHR), the long-term effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions may slowly accumulate over a period.
To evaluate all the model-based cost-effectiveness (CE) of physiotherapy interventions for patients with (TKHR).
A literature search was carried out on AMED, MEDLINE, CINAHL, DARE, HTA, NHSEED and cost-effectiveness registry databases from inception to May 2021.
Studies that assessed model-based CE of physiotherapy interventions following TKHR and were published in English language. The methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using the Philips Checklist criteria.
DATA EXTRACTION/DATA SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers, using a predefined data extraction form, independently extracted data. A descriptive synthesis was used to present the results.
Eight hundred eighty-six studies were identified, and the only 3 that met the inclusion criteria were included. Different model structures and assumptions were used in the included studies. The included studies were conducted in the United States of America (n=1), Singapore (n=1) and Italy (n=1). The societal (n=2) and healthcare (n=1) perspective were adopted in the studies. The included studies reported an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $57,200 and 27,471 Singapore dollar (SGD) per quality-adjusted life years in a time horizon of lifetime and three months, respectively. Physiotherapy (hydrotherapy) interventions were potentially cost-effective.
Based on the best available evidence, the findings of this review suggest that physiotherapy interventions were CE and cost saving. However, it is important to note that among others the CE of the interventions was a function of the healthcare system, duration of interventions, patient compliance and price.
CRD42019151214.
骨关节炎是疼痛和残疾的主要原因,它给个人和社会带来了相当大的经济负担。在全膝关节或髋关节置换术(TKHR)的管理中,物理治疗干预的长期效果可能会在一段时间内缓慢积累。
评估所有针对接受 TKHR 的患者的物理治疗干预的基于模型的成本效益(CE)。
从开始到 2021 年 5 月,对 AMED、MEDLINE、CINAHL、DARE、HTA、NHSEED 和成本效益登记数据库进行了文献检索。
评估 TKHR 后物理治疗干预基于模型的 CE 并以英文发表的研究。使用 Philips 清单标准评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
数据提取/数据综合:两名审查员使用预定义的数据提取表独立提取数据。使用描述性综合呈现结果。
共确定了 886 项研究,仅纳入了符合纳入标准的 3 项研究。纳入研究使用了不同的模型结构和假设。纳入研究在美国(n=1)、新加坡(n=1)和意大利(n=1)进行。研究采用了社会(n=2)和医疗保健(n=1)视角。纳入研究报告了终生和三个月时间范围内的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为 57200 美元和 27471 新加坡元(SGD)/每质量调整生命年。物理治疗(水疗)干预具有潜在的成本效益。
根据现有最佳证据,本综述的结果表明,物理治疗干预具有成本效益并且可以节省成本。然而,需要注意的是,除其他外,干预的 CE 是医疗保健系统、干预持续时间、患者依从性和价格的函数。
CRD42019151214。