Suppr超能文献

模拟现场条件下过热干蒸汽应用与杀虫剂喷雾防治普通床虱的比较效果。

Comparative Efficacy of Superheated Dry Steam Application and Insecticide Spray Against Common Bed Bugs Under Simulated Field Conditions.

机构信息

Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 96 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.

Department of Statistics, Rutgers University, 110 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2023 Feb 10;116(1):12-18. doi: 10.1093/jee/toac070.

Abstract

The common bed bug, Cimex lectularius L., is a difficult urban pest to control. A simulated field study was conducted to compare the efficacy of steam application and an insecticide mixture spray (0.05% acetamiprid and 0.06% bifenthrin mixture) against C. lectularius. Three types of furniture (desk chair, upholstered armchair, and wooden table) were treated in the laboratory. The efficacy of the treatments was evaluated by visual inspection and placement of interceptor traps under the legs of the furniture. One hundred mixed stages of an insecticide-resistant population of C. lectularius were released onto each furniture item. After a 10-day acclimation period, each furniture item received steam treatment, insecticide spray, or no treatment. The second application of treatment was conducted 14 d later. Bed bug counts from interceptors and visual inspections were recorded at 13 d and 28 d after the initial treatment. At 28 d, the mean (± SE) live bed bug count in the steam, spray, and control group was 1 ± 0, 2 ± 1, and 83 ± 10, respectively. Both treatment methods were highly effective in controlling bed bugs on furniture. The mean bed bug count from interceptors in the steam, spray, and control groups were 0.3 ± 0.2, 11 ± 7, and 47 ± 9, respectively. There was no significant difference in the efficacy between steam and spray treatments based on either visual inspection or bed bug counts from interceptors. However, based on interceptor counts, the steam treatment caused faster bed bug population reduction than insecticide sprays.

摘要

常见的臭虫,Cimex lectularius L.,是一种难以控制的城市害虫。进行了一项模拟现场研究,以比较蒸汽应用和杀虫剂混合物喷雾(0.05%乙酰甲胺磷和 0.06%联苯菊酯混合物)对 C. lectularius 的效果。在实验室中处理了三种家具(办公椅、有软垫的扶手椅和木制桌子)。通过视觉检查和在家具腿下放截获器陷阱来评估处理的效果。将 100 只混合阶段的抗杀虫剂臭虫种群释放到每件家具上。经过 10 天的适应期,每件家具都接受了蒸汽处理、杀虫剂喷雾或不处理。14 天后进行第二次处理。在初始处理后 13 天和 28 天,从截获器和目视检查记录臭虫计数。在 28 天时,蒸汽、喷雾和对照组的活臭虫平均(± SE)计数分别为 1 ± 0、2 ± 1 和 83 ± 10。两种处理方法都非常有效地控制了家具上的臭虫。蒸汽、喷雾和对照组的截获器平均臭虫计数分别为 0.3 ± 0.2、11 ± 7 和 47 ± 9。无论是通过目视检查还是截获器中的臭虫计数,蒸汽和喷雾处理的效果都没有显著差异。然而,根据截获器计数,蒸汽处理比杀虫剂喷雾更快地降低臭虫种群数量。

相似文献

2
Evaluation of an insecticide dust band treatment method for controlling bed bugs.
J Econ Entomol. 2013 Feb;106(1):347-52. doi: 10.1603/ec12259.
6
Comparison of multiple steam treatment durations for control of bed bugs (Cimex lectularius L.).
Pest Manag Sci. 2013 Sep;69(9):1061-5. doi: 10.1002/ps.3467. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
7
Posttreatment Feeding Affects Mortality of Bed Bugs (Hemiptera: Cimicidae) Exposed to Insecticides.
J Econ Entomol. 2016 Feb;109(1):273-83. doi: 10.1093/jee/tov293. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验