Revoile S, Pickett J M, Holden-Pitt L D, Talkin D, Brandt F D
J Speech Hear Res. 1987 Mar;30(1):3-12. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3001.03.
The use of cues to voicing perception of initial stop consonants in multiple spoken syllables was studied for moderately/severely hearing-impaired (n = 43) and normal-hearing listeners (n = 12). The test stimuli were ten utterances each of the syllables/baed, gaed, daed, paed, kaed, taed/. The utterances were analyzed acoustically to confirm the presence of certain cues to initial-stop voicing, namely, differences in voice onset time (VOT), aspiration, and vowel-onset values of the first formant and of fundamental frequency (fo). Test conditions were prepared in which different portions of the syllable onsets were either deleted or interchanged for voicing-cognate syllables. Also the fo contour was flattened for syllable pairs via analysis/synthesis using linear predictor code (LPC) processing. The results confirmed that VOT was a strong voicing cue for both the hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. When the aspirations of the voiceless stops were inserted between the release and the vowel of the voiced-stop syllables, the normal-hearing listeners perceived voiceless stops predominantly. The transition portions of the vowel onsets in burstless /baed, gaed, daed/ contained strong cues for voicing perception of /b,g,d/. The hearing-impaired listeners seemed less sensitive than the normal-hearing listeners to the aspiration-presence and the vowel-onset cues. The fo difference at vowel onset appeared to have no cue value for either group of listeners.
针对中度/重度听力受损者(n = 43)和听力正常的听众(n = 12),研究了在多个口语音节中使用线索来感知初始塞音的发声情况。测试刺激是十个发音,每个发音包含音节/baed、gaed、daed、paed、kaed、taed/。对这些发音进行声学分析,以确认存在某些初始塞音发声的线索,即语音起始时间(VOT)、送气以及第一共振峰和基频(fo)的元音起始值的差异。准备了测试条件,在这些条件下,音节起始的不同部分要么被删除,要么在发声同源音节之间互换。此外,通过使用线性预测编码(LPC)处理的分析/合成,使音节对的fo轮廓变平。结果证实,VOT对听力受损者和听力正常的听众都是一个很强的发声线索。当清塞音的送气音插入到浊塞音音节的除阻和元音之间时,听力正常的听众主要感知到清塞音。无声爆发的/baed、gaed、daed/中元音起始的过渡部分包含了/b、g、d/发声感知的强烈线索。听力受损的听众似乎比听力正常的听众对送气音的存在和元音起始线索不太敏感。元音起始时的fo差异对两组听众似乎都没有线索价值。